Chen Xu, Yuan Fei, Wu Lianqun
From the Department of Ophthalmology (Chen, Yuan), Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, and the Department of Ophthalmology (Wu), Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
From the Department of Ophthalmology (Chen, Yuan), Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, and the Department of Ophthalmology (Wu), Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Jan;42(1):163-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.12.005.
To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation methods after laser refractive surgery in myopic eyes, a comprehensive literature search was carried out for retrospective case series studies with data on post-myopic laser surgery IOL power calculations published from January 2000 to May 2014. A metaanalysis of the 9 identified studies was performed using odds ratios in percentage of prediction error within ±0.5 or 1.0 diopter (D) of the target refraction. Compared with the Haigis-L method, the clinical history method, corneal bypass method, and Feiz-Mannis method were associated with lower odds of predication; the Masket method showed higher odds. The subgroup data showed significantly better performance of the Shammas no-history method with the Shammas post-LASIK formula than the Haigis-L method in predication error. The Masket method and the Shammas no-history method with the Shammas post-LASIK formula without historical data had more prediction accuracy than the Haigis-L method. The clinical history method, Feiz-Mannis method, and corneal bypass method, which required historical data, were less accurate in their predictions.
No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
为评估近视眼激光屈光手术后人工晶状体（IOL）屈光力计算方法的准确性，我们进行了全面的文献检索，以查找2000年1月至2014年5月发表的有关近视眼激光手术后IOL屈光力计算数据的回顾性病例系列研究。使用目标屈光度±0.5或1.0屈光度（D）内预测误差百分比的比值比，对9项纳入研究进行了荟萃分析。与Haigis-L方法相比，临床病史法、角膜旁路法和Feiz-Mannis法预测的比值较低；Masket法显示出较高的比值。亚组数据显示，Shammas无病史法与Shammas LASIK术后公式在预测误差方面的表现明显优于Haigis-L法。Masket法以及无历史数据的Shammas无病史法与Shammas LASIK术后公式相比，预测准确性高于Haigis-L法。需要历史数据的临床病史法、Feiz-Mannis法和角膜旁路法预测准确性较低。
没有作者对文中提及的任何材料或方法拥有财务或专有权益。
