网站调查法评估高等教育员工健康与安全计划。
Website Survey Method for Assessing Higher Education Employee Health and Safety Programs.
机构信息
Muhlenberg College, Allentown, Pennsylvania (Ms Malomet); Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (Dr Harber).
出版信息
J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Feb 1;63(2):119-125. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002091.
OBJECTIVE
The higher education industry in the United States is large (almost four million employees and 19 million students) with diverse hazards.
METHODS
We apply a novel health services research approach to systematically assess a sample of 55 institutional websites. The accessibility, content, and coverage of occupational health/safety program information were systematically coded for several domains (eg, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)-related, specific hazards, clinical, person-oriented, COVID-19, and coverage).
RESULTS
Information was more available for programs related to OSHA mandates (eg, chemical hygiene) and specific hazards than for person-oriented programs (eg, counseling). Larger institutions provide better information and more comprehensive programs than smaller institutions.
CONCLUSIONS
Higher education institutions warrant increasing attention to occupational health and safety, particularly as COVID-19 increased attention to workplace health issues.
目的
美国高等教育行业规模庞大（近 400 万名员工和 1900 万名学生），存在多种危害。
方法
我们采用一种新颖的健康服务研究方法，系统评估了 55 个机构网站的样本。我们对职业健康/安全计划信息的可及性、内容和涵盖范围进行了系统编码，涵盖了多个领域（例如，与职业安全与健康管理局（OSHA）相关的、特定危害、临床、以人为本、COVID-19 和涵盖范围）。
结果
与以人为中心的计划（例如咨询）相比，与 OSHA 授权相关的计划（例如化学卫生）和特定危害的计划的信息更为可用。较大的机构比较小的机构提供更好的信息和更全面的计划。
结论
高等教育机构需要加强对职业健康和安全的关注，特别是在 COVID-19 增加了对工作场所健康问题的关注之后。
Zotero 插件