Suppr超能文献

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗难治性腹水和静脉曲张出血的决策:MELD,还是不 MELD,这是个问题。

Decision making for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt in refractory ascites and variceal bleeding: MELD, or not MELD, that is the question.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz.

Department of Internal Medicine II, Urban Hospitals of Worms, Klinikum Worms gGmbH, Worms.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Dec 1;33(1S Suppl 1):e214-e222. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002009.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score has been shown to predict 3-month prognosis following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPS) in liver cirrhosis; however, that score was derived from a mixed cohort, including patients with refractory ascites and variceal bleeding. This study re-evaluates the role of the MELD score and focuses on differences between both groups of patients.

METHODS

A total of 301 patients (192 male and 109 female) received TIPS, 213 because of refractory ascites and 88 because of variceal bleeding. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to identify predictors of mortality and area under the receiver operator characteristics (AUROC) were used to assess the prognostic capacity of the MELD score and of the results of predictors of the multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

In refractory ascites, age, bilirubin and albumin were independent predictors of mortality. In variceal bleeding, emergency TIPS during ongoing bleeding, concomitant grade III ascites, history of hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, bilirubin and platelet count proved significant. AUROCs of the MELD score for 3-month survival yielded 0.543 and 0.836 for refractory ascites and variceal bleeding, respectively (P < 0.001). For 1-year survival, the respective AUROCs yielded 0.533 and 0.767 (P < 0.001). In contrast to MELD, the AUROCs based on the calculated risk scores of this study resulted in 0.660 and 0.876 for 3-month survival, and 0.665 and 0.835 for 1-year survival in patients with ascites and variceal bleeding, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In refractory ascites, the prognostic capability of MELD is significantly inferior compared to variceal bleeding. The results of our multivariate analyses and AUROC calculations corroborate the impact of different prognostic variables in patients undergoing TIPS for ascites and variceal bleeding.

摘要

目的

终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分已被证明可预测肝硬化患者经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)后 3 个月的预后;然而,该评分是从包括难治性腹水和静脉曲张出血患者的混合队列中得出的。本研究重新评估了 MELD 评分的作用,并重点关注两组患者之间的差异。

方法

共 301 例患者(男 192 例,女 109 例)接受 TIPS 治疗,其中 213 例因难治性腹水,88 例因静脉曲张出血。进行单变量和多变量 Cox 分析以确定死亡率的预测因素,并使用接受者操作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUROC)评估 MELD 评分和多变量分析结果的预测能力。

结果

在难治性腹水患者中,年龄、胆红素和白蛋白是死亡率的独立预测因素。在静脉曲张出血患者中,持续出血时进行紧急 TIPS、同时存在 III 级腹水、肝性脑病史、自发性细菌性腹膜炎、胆红素和血小板计数是显著的预测因素。MELD 评分预测 3 个月生存率的 AUROC 分别为难治性腹水和静脉曲张出血患者的 0.543 和 0.836(P<0.001)。对于 1 年生存率,相应的 AUROC 分别为 0.533 和 0.767(P<0.001)。与 MELD 相比,基于本研究计算的风险评分的 AUROC 在腹水和静脉曲张出血患者中分别为 3 个月生存率的 0.660 和 0.876,以及 1 年生存率的 0.665 和 0.835。

结论

在难治性腹水患者中,MELD 的预后能力明显低于静脉曲张出血患者。我们的多变量分析和 AUROC 计算结果证实了不同预后变量在接受 TIPS 治疗腹水和静脉曲张出血患者中的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c49/8734626/891a36cee0d9/ejgh-33-e214-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验