Suppr超能文献

早期 TIPS(经颈静脉肝内门体分流术)联合覆膜支架与标准治疗对肝硬化急性静脉曲张出血患者的随机对照试验。

Early TIPS with covered stents versus standard treatment for acute variceal bleeding in patients with advanced cirrhosis: a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Liver Diseases and Digestive Interventional Radiology, National Clinical Research Centre for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

Department of Digestive Endoscopy, National Clinical Research Centre for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;4(8):587-598. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30090-1. Epub 2019 May 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The survival benefit of early placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in patients with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding is controversial. We aimed to assess whether early TIPS improves survival in patients with advanced cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding.

METHODS

We did an investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised controlled trial at an academic hospital in China. Consecutive patients with advanced cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class B or C) and acute variceal bleeding who had been treated with vasoactive drugs plus endoscopic therapy were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either early TIPS (done within 72 h after initial endoscopy [early TIPS group]) or standard treatment (vasoactive drugs continued to day 5, followed by propranolol plus endoscopic band ligation for the prevention of rebleeding, with TIPS as rescue therapy when needed [control group]). Randomisation was done by web-based randomisation system using a Pocock and Simon's minimisation method with Child-Pugh class (B vs C) and presence or absence of active bleeding as adjustment factors. The primary outcome was transplantation-free survival, analysed in the intention-to-treat population, excluding individuals subsequently found to be ineligible for enrolment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01370161, and is completed.

FINDINGS

From June 26, 2011, to Sept 30, 2017, 373 patients were screened and 132 patients were randomly assigned to the early TIPS group (n=86) or to the control group (n=46). After exclusion of three individuals subsequently found to be ineligible for enrolment (two patients in the early TIPS group with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension or hepatocellular carcinoma, and one patient in the control group due to non-cirrhotic portal hypertension), 84 patients in the early TIPS group and 45 patients in the control group were included in the intention-to-treat population. 15 (18%) patients in the early TIPS group and 15 (33%) in the control group died; two (2%) patients in the early TIPS group and one (2%) in the control group underwent liver transplantation. Transplantation-free survival was higher in the early TIPS group than in the control group (hazard ratio 0·50, 95% CI 0·25-0·98; p=0·04). Transplantation-free survival at 6 weeks was 99% (95% CI 97-100) in the early TIPS group compared with 84% (75-96; absolute risk difference 15% [95% CI 5-48]; p=0·02) and at 1 year was 86% (79-94) in the early TIPS group versus 73% (62-88) in the control group (absolute risk difference 13% [95% CI 2-28]; p=0·046). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of hepatic hydrothorax (two [2%] of 84 patients in the early TIPS group vs one [2%] of 45 in the control group; p=0·96), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (one [1%] vs three [7%]; p=0·12), hepatic encephalopathy (29 [35%] vs 16 [36%]; p=1·00), hepatorenal syndrome (four [5%] vs six [13%]; p=0·10), and hepatocellular carcinoma (four [5%] vs one [2%]; p=0·68). There was no significant difference in the number of patients who experienced other serious adverse events (ten [12%] vs 11 [24%]; p=0·07) or non-serious adverse events (21 [25%] vs 19 [42%]; p=0·05) between groups.

INTERPRETATION

Early TIPS with covered stents improved transplantation-free survival in selected patients with advanced cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding and should therefore be preferred to the current standard of care.

FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Technology R&D Program, Optimized Overall Project of Shaanxi Province, Boost Program of Xijing Hospital.

摘要

背景

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)在肝硬化合并急性静脉曲张出血患者中的生存获益仍存在争议。我们旨在评估早期 TIPS 是否能改善晚期肝硬化合并急性静脉曲张出血患者的生存。

方法

我们在中国的一家学术医院进行了一项由研究者发起的、开放性标签、随机对照试验。连续纳入经血管活性药物加内镜治疗的晚期肝硬化(Child-Pugh 分级 B 或 C)合并急性静脉曲张出血患者,随机(2:1)分配至早期 TIPS 组(内镜治疗后 72 小时内进行 TIPS)或标准治疗组(血管活性药物持续使用至第 5 天,然后使用普萘洛尔加内镜套扎预防再出血,需要时 TIPS 作为挽救性治疗)。通过基于网络的随机化系统,采用 Pocock 和 Simon 的最小化方法,以 Child-Pugh 分级(B 与 C)和是否存在活动性出血为调整因素进行随机分组。主要结局为无移植生存,在意向治疗人群中进行分析,排除随后发现不符合入组条件的患者。这项研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT01370161,已经完成。

发现

自 2011 年 6 月 26 日至 2017 年 9 月 30 日,共有 373 名患者接受筛查,132 名患者被随机分配至早期 TIPS 组(n=86)或标准治疗组(n=46)。排除 3 名随后发现不符合入组条件的患者(2 名早期 TIPS 组患者为非肝硬化性门静脉高压或肝细胞癌,1 名标准治疗组患者为非肝硬化性门静脉高压)后,84 名早期 TIPS 组患者和 45 名标准治疗组患者纳入意向治疗人群。早期 TIPS 组 15 例(18%)患者和标准治疗组 15 例(33%)患者死亡;早期 TIPS 组 2 例(2%)患者和标准治疗组 1 例(2%)患者接受肝移植。早期 TIPS 组的无移植生存率高于标准治疗组(风险比 0.50,95%CI 0.25-0.98;p=0.04)。早期 TIPS 组 6 周时的无移植生存率为 99%(95%CI 97-100),而标准治疗组为 84%(75-96;绝对风险差异 15%[95%CI 5-48];p=0.02);1 年时,早期 TIPS 组的无移植生存率为 86%(79-94),而标准治疗组为 73%(62-88)(绝对风险差异 13%[95%CI 2-28];p=0.046)。两组患者的肝性胸水发生率(早期 TIPS 组 84 例中有 2 例[2%],标准治疗组 45 例中有 1 例[2%];p=0.96)、自发性细菌性腹膜炎(早期 TIPS 组 1 例[1%],标准治疗组 3 例[7%];p=0.12)、肝性脑病(早期 TIPS 组 29 例[35%],标准治疗组 16 例[36%];p=1.00)、肝肾综合征(早期 TIPS 组 4 例[5%],标准治疗组 6 例[13%];p=0.10)和肝细胞癌(早期 TIPS 组 4 例[5%],标准治疗组 1 例[2%];p=0.68)发生率均无显著差异。两组患者经历其他严重不良事件(早期 TIPS 组 10 例[12%],标准治疗组 11 例[24%];p=0.07)或非严重不良事件(早期 TIPS 组 21 例[25%],标准治疗组 19 例[42%];p=0.05)的人数无显著差异。

结论

使用覆膜支架的早期 TIPS 改善了晚期肝硬化合并急性静脉曲张出血患者的无移植生存率,因此应优先考虑该治疗方法,而非目前的标准治疗。

资助

国家自然科学基金、国家重点研发计划、陕西省优化整体项目、西京医院促进计划。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验