Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Mickiewicza 33, 31-120, Kraków, Poland.
School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 23;10(1):20320. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76917-2.
Habitat fragmentation is considered as major threat to biodiversity worldwide. Biodiversity can be described as taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity. However, the effect of forest fragmentation on taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity is barely understood. We compare the response of taxonomic (species richness), phylogenetic and functional diversity of birds to forest fragmentation. We hypothesised that with increasing forest patch isolation and/or decreasing patch size the diversity of birds decreases but only if certain thresholds of fragmentation metrics are reached. Specifically, we hypothesized that out of the three diversity components the taxonomic diversity is the most sensitive to forest fragmentation, which means that it starts declining at larger patch size and higher connectivity values than phylogenetic and functional diversity do. We compared the three biodiversity metrics of central European bird species in a large set of forest patches located in an agricultural landscape. General additive modeling and segmented regression were used in analyses. Habitat fragmentation differentially affected studied biodiversity metrics. Bird taxonomic diversity was the most responsive towards changes in fragmentation. We observed an increase in taxonomic diversity with increasing patch area, which then stabilized after reaching certain patch size. Functional diversity turned out to be the least responsive to the fragmentation metrics and forest stand characteristics. It decreased linearly with the decreasing isolation of forest patches. Apart from the habitat fragmentation, bird taxonomic diversity but not phylogenetic diversity was positively associated with forest stand age. The lower share of dominant tree species, the highest taxonomic diversity was. While preserving a whole spectrum of forests (in terms of age, fragmentation and size) is important from the biodiversity perspective, forest bird species might need large, intact, old-growth forests. Since the large and intact forest becomes scarcer, our study underscore their importance for the preservation of forest specialist species.
生境破碎化被认为是全球生物多样性的主要威胁。生物多样性可以描述为分类学、功能和系统发育多样性。然而,森林破碎化对分类学、系统发育和功能多样性的影响几乎没有被理解。我们比较了鸟类分类学(物种丰富度)、系统发育和功能多样性对森林破碎化的响应。我们假设,随着森林斑块隔离度的增加和/或斑块面积的减小,鸟类多样性会减少,但只有在达到一定的破碎化指标阈值时才会发生这种情况。具体来说,我们假设在这三个多样性组成部分中,分类学多样性对森林破碎化最敏感,这意味着它开始在比系统发育和功能多样性更大的斑块面积和更高的连通性值时下降。我们在一个农业景观中比较了中欧鸟类物种的三个生物多样性指标在大量森林斑块中的表现。在分析中使用了广义加性模型和分段回归。生境破碎化对研究中的生物多样性指标产生了不同的影响。鸟类分类多样性对破碎化变化的反应最为敏感。我们观察到,随着斑块面积的增加,分类多样性增加,然后在达到一定的斑块面积后稳定下来。功能多样性对破碎化指标和森林林分特征的反应最小。它随着森林斑块隔离度的降低而线性下降。除了生境破碎化外,鸟类分类多样性而不是系统发育多样性与森林林分年龄呈正相关。优势树种的份额越低,分类多样性越高。从生物多样性的角度来看,保护整个森林(从年龄、破碎化和大小方面)非常重要,但森林鸟类可能需要大型、完整、古老的森林。由于大型和完整的森林变得越来越稀缺,我们的研究强调了它们对保护森林特有物种的重要性。