• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2010-2017 年泰国和美国的咔哇潮饮暴露案例的比较分析。

A comparative analysis of kratom exposure cases in Thailand and the United States from 2010-2017.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Medical Toxicology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

North Texas Poison Center, Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, TX, USA.

出版信息

Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2021 Jan 2;47(1):74-83. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2020.1836185. Epub 2020 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1080/00952990.2020.1836185
PMID:33232183
Abstract

Interest in the Southeast Asian natural remedy kratom has increased in Western countries recently, along with increasing concern over its potential toxic effects. To describe and compare demographics, common co-exposure substances, clinical effects, treatments, and medical outcomes of kratom "abuse" exposures in the United States (US) and Thailand. This is a retrospective analysis of kratom "abuse" exposures, defined as use when attempting to gain a psychotropic effect, reported to the National Poison Data System (NPDS) in the US and the Ramathibodi Poison Center (RPC) in Thailand from 2010 to 2017. Multivariate analysis identified risk factors for severe medical outcomes, defined as both ICU admissions and death. Nine-hundred-twenty-eight cases were included (760 from NPDS and 168 from RPC). A greater proportion of cases involved co-exposures in Thailand (64.8% versus 37.4%; odds ratio [OR] = 3.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.15-4.47, < .01). Both countries had a similar prevalence of opioid and benzodiazepine co-ingestions, but the US had more co-ingestions with other sedatives (4.6% versus 0%, OR = 0, 95% CI = 0-0.47, < .01). Common clinical effects included tachycardia (30.4%), agitation/irritability (26.2%), and drowsiness/lethargy (21.1%). Six deaths occurred, including one single-substance exposure in the US, three multiple-substance exposures in the US, and two multiple-substance exposures in Thailand. Severe medical outcomes were reported more frequently in the US (OR = 18.82, 95% CI = 5.85-60.56, p < .01). Despite lower frequencies of co-ingestants overall, US kratom abuse exposures yielded greater clinical severity. This disparity may be attributable to differences in the products labeled "kratom," greater sedative co-exposures in the US, and/or differences in population genetics or use patterns.

摘要

最近,西方国家对东南亚天然药物 kratom 的兴趣日益增加,同时对其潜在的毒性作用也越来越关注。本研究旨在描述和比较美国和泰国的 kratom“滥用”暴露病例的人口统计学特征、共同暴露物质、临床效应、治疗方法和医疗结局。这是一项对 kratom“滥用”暴露病例的回顾性分析,这些病例被定义为为了获得精神活性作用而使用 kratom 的情况,病例报告来自美国国家毒物数据系统(NPDS)和泰国 Ramathibodi 中毒中心(RPC),时间跨度为 2010 年至 2017 年。多变量分析确定了严重医疗结局的危险因素,严重医疗结局定义为 ICU 入院和死亡。共纳入 928 例病例(NPDS 760 例,RPC 168 例)。泰国的病例中共同暴露的比例更高(64.8%对 37.4%;比值比 [OR] = 3.10,95%置信区间 [CI] = 2.15-4.47,<0.01)。两国的阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物共同摄入的比例相似,但美国的其他镇静剂共同摄入的比例更高(4.6%对 0%,OR = 0,95%CI = 0-0.47,<0.01)。常见的临床效应包括心动过速(30.4%)、激惹/烦躁(26.2%)和嗜睡/昏睡(21.1%)。共发生 6 例死亡,包括美国 1 例单一物质暴露,美国 3 例多种物质暴露,泰国 2 例多种物质暴露。美国报告的严重医疗结局更为常见(OR = 18.82,95%CI = 5.85-60.56,p < 0.01)。尽管总体来看共同摄入的物质频率较低,但美国的 kratom 滥用暴露导致了更大的临床严重程度。这种差异可能归因于标签为“kratom”的产品的差异、美国镇静剂共同摄入的差异,以及/或者人口遗传学或使用模式的差异。

相似文献

1
A comparative analysis of kratom exposure cases in Thailand and the United States from 2010-2017.2010-2017 年泰国和美国的咔哇潮饮暴露案例的比较分析。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2021 Jan 2;47(1):74-83. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2020.1836185. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
2
Kratom exposures reported to United States poison control centers: 2011-2017.美国毒物控制中心报告的卡痛类物质暴露情况:2011-2017 年。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2019 Oct;57(10):847-854. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2019.1569236. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
3
Notes from the Field: Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) Exposures Reported to Poison Centers - United States, 2010-2015.现场记录:2010-2015 年美国毒物控制中心报告的与咔哇(Mitragyna speciosa)有关的暴露情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Jul 29;65(29):748-9. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6529a4.
4
Kratom exposures among older adults reported to U.S. poison centers, 2014-2019.美国毒物控制中心报告的 2014-2019 年老年人曲马多暴露情况。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Aug;69(8):2176-2184. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17326. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
5
Kratom abuse in Ramathibodi Poison Center, Thailand: a five-year experience.泰国玛希敦大学中毒中心的东革阿里滥用:五年经验。
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2013 Nov-Dec;45(5):404-8. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2013.844532.
6
Kratom exposures reported to Texas poison centers.向德克萨斯毒物控制中心报告的卡痛暴露事件。
J Addict Dis. 2013;32(4):396-400. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2013.854153.
7
Prevalence and description of kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) use in the United States: a cross-sectional study.美国 kratom(Mitragyna speciosa)的使用情况及描述:一项横断面研究。
Addiction. 2021 Jan;116(1):176-181. doi: 10.1111/add.15082. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
8
Characterization of intentional-abuse venlafaxine exposures reported to poison control centers in the United States. characterize 故意滥用文拉法辛暴露在美国中毒控制中心的报告
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019;45(4):421-426. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2019.1599382. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
9
The pharmacology and toxicology of kratom: from traditional herb to drug of abuse.kratom的药理学与毒理学:从传统草药到滥用药物
Int J Legal Med. 2016 Jan;130(1):127-38. doi: 10.1007/s00414-015-1279-y. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
10
2011 Annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers' National Poison Data System (NPDS): 29th Annual Report.2011 年美国毒物控制中心协会国家毒物数据系统(NPDS)年度报告:第 29 次年度报告。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2012 Dec;50(10):911-1164. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2012.746424.

引用本文的文献

1
Kratom safety and toxicology in the public health context: research needs to better inform regulation.公共卫生背景下的 kratom 安全性与毒理学:需要开展研究以更好地为监管提供依据。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jun 3;15:1403140. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1403140. eCollection 2024.
2
Kratom's Emergence and Persistence Within the US Polydrug Epidemic.在美国多药滥用流行中 kratom 的出现与持续存在。
Curr Addict Rep. 2023;10(2):262-271. doi: 10.1007/s40429-023-00476-5. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
3
Demographic and behavioral factors associated with kratom use among U.S. college students.
与美国大学生使用咔哇潮饮相关的人口统计学和行为因素。
J Am Coll Health. 2024 Oct;72(7):1983-1987. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2112584. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
4
Public Health Implications and Possible Sources of Lead (Pb) as a Contaminant of Poorly Regulated Kratom Products in the United States.美国监管不力的 kratom 产品中作为污染物的铅(Pb)对公共健康的影响及可能来源
Toxics. 2022 Jul 19;10(7):398. doi: 10.3390/toxics10070398.
5
Reports of Adverse Events Associated with Use of Novel Psychoactive Substances, 2017-2020: A Review.报告称,2017 年至 2020 年与新型精神活性物质使用相关的不良事件:一项综述。
J Anal Toxicol. 2022 Jul 14;46(6):e116-e185. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkac023.
6
Assessment of Kratom Use Disorder and Withdrawal Among an Online Convenience Sample of US Adults.评估美国成年人在线便利样本中使用卡痛和戒断情况。
J Addict Med. 2022;16(6):666-670. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000986.
7
Associations of Lifetime Nonmedical Opioid, Methamphetamine, and Kratom Use within a Nationally Representative US Sample.在一个具有全国代表性的美国样本中,终身非医疗用阿片类药物、甲基苯丙胺和卡痛使用的关联。
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2022 Nov-Dec;54(5):429-439. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2021.2006374. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
8
The Adverse Cardiovascular Effects and Cardiotoxicity of Kratom ( Korth.): A Comprehensive Review.kratom(Korth.)的心血管不良影响和心脏毒性:综述
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Sep 27;12:726003. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.726003. eCollection 2021.
9
Kratom Use Within the Context of the Evolving Opioid Crisis and the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States.在美国不断演变的阿片类药物危机和新冠疫情背景下的 kratom 使用情况
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Aug 26;12:729220. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.729220. eCollection 2021.
10
Case Report: Treatment of Kratom Use Disorder With a Classical Tricyclic Antidepressant.病例报告:使用经典三环类抗抑郁药治疗 kratom 使用障碍。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 31;12:640218. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.640218. eCollection 2021.