Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Apr 1;11(4):525-528. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.220.
Townsend and colleagues highlighted the myriad political forces which fostered attention to health issues during negotiations to establish a new trans-pacific trade deal in Australia (the CP-TPP [Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership], formerly known as TPP). Among the factors they identify, exporter interests and exogenous events helped to generate attention to trade-related concerns about tobacco and access medicines, and limited attention to nutrition and alcohol. These are important considerations as the United Kingdom negotiates a trade deal with the United States in haste, whilst at the same time attempting to manage the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In this commentary, I reflect on changing attention to trade and nutrition during the COVID-19 pandemic in light of Townsend and colleagues' analysis. I explore scope for greater attention to nutrition in US-UK trade negotiations, and the challenges created by the vested interests of major UK and US processed food exporters. I further discuss the utility of the theoretical tools employed by Townsend and colleagues for wider debates in the political economy of health.
汤森德(Townsend)及其同事强调了在澳大利亚(即跨太平洋伙伴全面进展协定,简称 CP-TPP[原 TPP])进行新的跨太平洋贸易协定谈判过程中,促进人们关注健康问题的无数政治力量。他们确定的因素包括出口商利益和外部事件有助于引起人们对与贸易有关的烟草和药品获取问题的关注,并对营养和酒精问题的关注有限。随着英国急于与美国进行贸易谈判,同时试图应对持续的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行,这些都是重要的考虑因素。在本评论中,我根据汤森德及其同事的分析,思考了在 COVID-19 大流行期间贸易和营养关注度的变化。我探讨了在英美贸易谈判中更多关注营养的范围,以及英国和美国主要加工食品出口商的既得利益所带来的挑战。我还进一步讨论了汤森德及其同事使用的理论工具在更广泛的卫生政治经济学辩论中的作用。