• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Just Say No to the TPP: A Democratic Setback for American and Asian Public Health Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".对 TPP 说不:美国和亚洲公共卫生的民主挫折 评“跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们担心的那样对健康不利?”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jul 1;6(7):419-421. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.145.
2
A new generation of trade policy: potential risks to diet-related health from the trans pacific partnership agreement.新一代贸易政策:跨太平洋伙伴关系协定对饮食相关健康的潜在风险。
Global Health. 2013 Oct 16;9:46. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-46.
3
The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Should We "Fear the Fear"? Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:我们应该“恐惧恐惧”吗?》评《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们担心的那样对健康不利?》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jun 1;6(6):353-355. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.140.
4
New Pacific trade deal--good for pharma, bad for public health?
BMJ. 2015 Jul 8;351:h3649. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3649.
5
Advancing Public Health on the Changing Global Trade and Investment Agenda Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".推进变化中的全球贸易和投资议程中的公共卫生事业——评《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们所担心的那样影响健康?》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 1;6(5):295-298. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.129.
6
The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Trading away our health?《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》:拿我们的健康做交易?
Can J Public Health. 2015 Apr 29;106(4):e249-51. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4896.
7
Trade Policy and Health: Adding Retrospective Studies to the Research Agenda Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".贸易政策与健康:将回顾性研究纳入研究议程——评《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们所担心的那样影响健康?》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Apr 1;6(4):243-244. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.123.
8
Assessing the Health Impact of Trade: A Call for an Expanded Research Agenda Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".评估贸易对健康的影响:扩大研究议程的呼吁——评“跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们所担心的那样对健康造成影响?”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 1;6(5):293-294. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.126.
9
Is health impact assessment useful in the context of trade negotiations? A case study of the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement.健康影响评估在贸易谈判背景下是否有用?跨太平洋伙伴关系协定的案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 4;6(4):e010339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010339.
10
Trans-Pacific Partnership Provisions in Intellectual Property, Transparency, and Investment Chapters Threaten Access to Medicines in the US and Elsewhere.《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》中知识产权、透明度和投资章节的条款威胁到美国及其他地区的药品可及性。
PLoS Med. 2016 Mar 8;13(3):e1001970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001970. eCollection 2016 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
The TPP Is Dead, Long Live the TPP? A Response to Recent Commentaries.《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》已死,《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》万岁?对近期评论的回应
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Apr 1;6(4):245-247. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.12.

本文引用的文献

1
The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:它对健康的影响是否如我们所担心的那样?》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Aug 1;5(8):487-496. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.41.
2
Using Win-Win Strategies to Implement Health in All Policies: A Cross-Case Analysis.运用双赢策略实施“健康融入所有政策”:一项跨案例分析
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 4;11(2):e0147003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147003. eCollection 2016.
3
The role of public law-based litigation in tobacco companies' strategies in high-income, FCTC ratifying countries, 2004-14.2004年至2014年期间,基于公法的诉讼在高收入、批准《烟草控制框架公约》国家烟草公司战略中的作用。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Sep;38(3):516-521. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv068. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
4
Protocol: realist synthesis of the impact of unemployment insurance policies on poverty and health.方案:对失业保险政策对贫困和健康影响的现实主义综合分析
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Feb;48:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
5
Strengthening the implementation of Health in All Policies: a methodology for realist explanatory case studies.加强“健康融入所有政策”的实施:一种现实主义解释性案例研究方法
Health Policy Plan. 2015 May;30(4):462-73. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu021. Epub 2014 May 10.
6
Invited commentary: On the future of social epidemiology--a case for scientific realism.特邀评论:关于社会流行病学的未来——一种科学实在论的观点。
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Sep 15;178(6):852-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt143. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
7
Manufacturing epidemics: the role of global producers in increased consumption of unhealthy commodities including processed foods, alcohol, and tobacco.制造流行:全球生产商在增加包括加工食品、酒精和烟草在内的不健康商品消费方面的作用。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):e1001235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001235. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
8
Implementing successful intimate partner violence screening programs in health care settings: evidence generated from a realist-informed systematic review.在医疗保健环境中实施成功的亲密伴侣暴力筛查计划:基于现实主义方法的系统评价产生的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Mar;72(6):855-66. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.12.019. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
9
Against unjust global distribution of power and money: the report of the WHO commission on the social determinants of health: global inequality and the future of public health policy.反对全球权力和财富的不公平分配:世界卫生组织健康问题社会决定因素委员会的报告:全球不平等与公共卫生政策的未来
J Public Health Policy. 2009 Jul;30(2):163-75. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2009.15.
10
Politics or policies vs politics and policies: a comment on Lundberg.政治或政策与政治及政策:对伦德伯格的评论
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;39(5):1396-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp220. Epub 2009 Jun 2.

对 TPP 说不:美国和亚洲公共卫生的民主挫折 评“跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们担心的那样对健康不利?”

Just Say No to the TPP: A Democratic Setback for American and Asian Public Health Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".

机构信息

Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jul 1;6(7):419-421. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.145.

DOI:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.145
PMID:28812839
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5505113/
Abstract

(TPP) policy and the severe threats to public health that it implies for 12 Pacific Rim populations from the Americas and Asia (Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, United States, and Vietnam). With careful and analytic precision the authors convincingly unearth many aspects of this piece of legislation that undermine the public health achievements of most countries involved in the TTP. Our comments complement their policy analysis with the aim of providing a positive heuristic tool to assist in the understanding of the TPP, and other upcoming treaties like the even more encompassing Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), and in so doing motivate the public health community to oppose the implementation of the relevant provisions of the agreements. The aims of this commentary on the study of Labonté et al are to show that an understanding of the health effects of the TPP is incomplete without a political analysis of policy formation, and that realist methods can be useful to uncover the mechanisms underlying TPP's political and policy processes.

摘要

(TPP)政策以及它对来自美洲和亚洲的 12 个环太平洋地区人群(澳大利亚、文莱、加拿大、智利、日本、马来西亚、墨西哥、新西兰、秘鲁、新加坡、美国和越南)的公共卫生构成的严重威胁。作者以谨慎和分析的精准度,令人信服地揭示了这项立法的许多方面,这些方面破坏了大多数参与 TPP 的国家在公共卫生方面取得的成就。我们的评论以他们的政策分析为补充,旨在提供一个积极的启发式工具,以帮助理解 TPP 以及其他即将出台的条约,如更全面的跨大西洋贸易和投资伙伴关系协定(TTIP),并借此激励公共卫生界反对执行协议的相关条款。本文对拉邦特等人的研究进行评论的目的是表明,如果不对政策形成进行政治分析,就无法全面了解 TPP 的健康影响,而现实主义方法可以有助于揭示 TPP 政治和政策过程背后的机制。