Suppr超能文献

牙周疾病评估的最佳检查部位:应用项目反应理论等级反应模型

Optimal Examination Sites for Periodontal Disease Evaluation: Applying the Item Response Theory Graded Response Model.

作者信息

Nomura Yoshiaki, Morozumi Toshiya, Fukuda Mitsuo, Hanada Nobuhiro, Kakuta Erika, Kobayashi Hiroaki, Minabe Masato, Nakamura Toshiaki, Nakayama Yohei, Nishimura Fusanori, Noguchi Kazuyuki, Numabe Yukihiro, Ogata Yorimasa, Saito Atsushi, Sato Soh, Sekino Satoshi, Sugano Naoyuki, Sugaya Tsutomu, Suzuki Fumihiko, Takahashi Keiso, Takai Hideki, Takashiba Shogo, Umeda Makoto, Yoshie Hiromasa, Yoshimura Atsutoshi, Yoshinari Nobuo, Nakagawa Taneaki

机构信息

Department of Translational Research, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine, Yokohama 230-8501, Japan.

Division of Periodontology, Department of Oral Interdisciplinary Medicine, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, Yokosuka 238-8580, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 21;9(11):3754. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113754.

Abstract

Periodontal examination data have a complex structure. For epidemiological studies, mass screenings, and public health use, a simple index that represents the periodontal condition is necessary. Periodontal indices for partial examination of selected teeth have been developed. However, the selected teeth vary between indices, and a justification for the selection of examination teeth has not been presented. We applied a graded response model based on the item response theory to select optimal examination teeth and sites that represent periodontal conditions. Data were obtained from 254 patients who participated in a multicenter follow-up study. Baseline data were obtained from initial follow-up. Optimal examination sites were selected using item information calculated by graded response modeling. Twelve sites-maxillary 2nd premolar (palatal-medial), 1st premolar (palatal-distal), canine (palatal-medial), lateral incisor (palatal-central), central incisor (palatal-distal) and mandibular 1st premolar (lingual, medial)-were selected. Mean values for clinical attachment level, probing pocket depth, and bleeding on probing by full mouth examinations were used for objective variables. Measuring the clinical parameters of these sites can predict the results of full mouth examination. For calculating the periodontal index by partial oral examination, a justification for the selection of examination sites is essential. This study presents an evidence-based partial examination methodology and its modeling.

摘要

牙周检查数据具有复杂的结构。对于流行病学研究、大规模筛查和公共卫生用途而言,需要一个能代表牙周状况的简单指标。已开发出用于部分选定牙齿检查的牙周指数。然而,不同指数所选定的牙齿各不相同,且尚未给出选择检查牙齿的理由。我们应用基于项目反应理论的等级反应模型来选择能代表牙周状况的最佳检查牙齿和部位。数据来自参与一项多中心随访研究的254名患者。基线数据取自初始随访。使用通过等级反应模型计算的项目信息来选择最佳检查部位。选定了12个部位——上颌第二前磨牙(腭侧-内侧)、第一前磨牙(腭侧-远中)、尖牙(腭侧-内侧)、侧切牙(腭侧-中央)、中切牙(腭侧-远中)以及下颌第一前磨牙(舌侧、内侧)。全口检查的临床附着水平、探诊深度和探诊出血的平均值用作客观变量。测量这些部位的临床参数能够预测全口检查的结果。对于通过部分口腔检查计算牙周指数而言,选择检查部位的理由至关重要。本研究提出了一种基于证据的部分检查方法及其模型构建。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/686b/7700480/0a8dd66c34c5/jcm-09-03754-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验