Basudan Amani M, Shaheen Marwa Y, Niazy Abdurahman A, van den Beucken Jeroen J J P, Jansen John A, Alghamdi Hamdan S
Department of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Materials (Basel). 2020 Nov 20;13(22):5248. doi: 10.3390/ma13225248.
We evaluated the response to peri-implant bone placed in the femoral condyle of osteoporotic rats, following intravenous zoledronate (ZOL) treatment in three settings: pre-implantation (ZOL-Pre), post-implantation (ZOL-Post), and pre- + post-implantation (ZOL-Pre+Post). Twenty-four female Wistar rats were ovariectomized (OVX). After 12 weeks, the rats received titanium implants in the right femoral condyle. ZOL (0.04 mg/kg, weekly) was administered to six rats 4 weeks pre-implantation and was stopped at implant placement. To another six rats, ZOL was given post-implantation and continued for 6 weeks. Additional six rats received ZOL treatment pre- and post-implantation. Control animals received weekly saline intravenous injections. At 6 weeks post-implantation, samples were retrieved for histological evaluation of the percentage of bone area (%BA) and of the percentage of bone-to-implant contact (%BIC). BA% for ZOL-Pre (29.6% ± 9.0%) and ZOL-Post (27.9% ± 5.6%) rats were significantly increased compared to that of the controls (17.3% ± 3.9%, < 0.05). In contrast, ZOL-Pre+Post rats (20.4% ± 5.0%) showed similar BA% compared to Saline controls ( = 0.731). BIC% revealed a significant increase for ZOL-Post (65.8% ± 16.9%) and ZOL-Pre+Post (68.3% ± 10.0%) rats compared with that of Saline controls (43.3% ± 9.6%, < 0.05), while ZOL-Pre rats (55.6% ± 19%) showed a BIC% comparable to that of Saline controls ( = 0.408). Our results suggest that receiving intravenous ZOL treatment before or after implant placement enhances peri-implant bone responses in terms of bone area. However, the effect of different ZOL treatment regimens on BIC% was found to be inconclusive.
我们评估了在三种情况下,经静脉注射唑来膦酸(ZOL)治疗后,植入骨质疏松大鼠股骨髁的种植体周围骨的反应:植入前(ZOL-Pre)、植入后(ZOL-Post)以及植入前 + 植入后(ZOL-Pre+Post)。将24只雌性Wistar大鼠进行卵巢切除(OVX)。12周后,在大鼠右股骨髁植入钛种植体。6只大鼠在植入前4周给予ZOL(0.04 mg/kg,每周一次),并在植入时停止给药。另外6只大鼠在植入后给予ZOL,并持续6周。还有6只大鼠在植入前和植入后均接受ZOL治疗。对照动物每周静脉注射生理盐水。植入后6周,取出样本进行组织学评估,以确定骨面积百分比(%BA)和骨与种植体接触百分比(%BIC)。与对照组(17.3% ± 3.9%,P < 0.05)相比,ZOL-Pre组(29.6% ± 9.0%)和ZOL-Post组(27.9% ± 5.6%)大鼠的BA%显著增加。相比之下,ZOL-Pre+Post组大鼠(20.4% ± 5.0%)的BA%与生理盐水对照组相似(P = 0.731)。与生理盐水对照组(43.3% ± 9.6%,P < 0.05)相比,ZOL-Post组(65.8% ± 16.9%)和ZOL-Pre+Post组(68.3% ± 10.0%)大鼠的BIC%显著增加,而ZOL-Pre组大鼠(55.6% ± 19%)的BIC%与生理盐水对照组相当(P = 0.408)。我们的结果表明,在植入前或植入后接受静脉注射ZOL治疗可增强种植体周围骨在骨面积方面的反应。然而,发现不同的ZOL治疗方案对BIC%的影响尚无定论。