• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神分裂症安慰剂对照复发预防试验的历史回顾:临床均衡的丧失。

A historical review of placebo-controlled, relapse prevention trials in schizophrenia: The loss of clinical equipoise.

机构信息

Columbia University Medical Center, New York - Presbyterian Hospital, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, United States of America.

Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, United States of America.

出版信息

Schizophr Res. 2021 Mar;229:122-131. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.11.022. Epub 2020 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2020.11.022
PMID:33234427
Abstract

Recent ethical critiques have proposed that placebo-controlled, relapse prevention trials in schizophrenia are no longer justifiable and are therefore unethical. This review provides an historical perspective on the justifications for these trials and how arguments evolved over several decades. We identified 87 placebo-controlled, relapse prevention trials published over the last seventy years and examined the purpose for each trial. We found that first-generation trials had compelling justifications, yet these arguments changed considerably over time. Second-generation trials offered comparatively weaker-and sometimes no-justifications for their conduct. Without clear and compelling justifications for a given trial, it is not ethical to continue using this study design.

摘要

最近的伦理批评提出,精神分裂症的安慰剂对照、防止复发试验不再合理,因此不道德。本综述提供了这些试验的合理性的历史视角,以及这些论点如何在几十年中演变。我们确定了过去七十年中发表的 87 项安慰剂对照、防止复发试验,并检查了每个试验的目的。我们发现第一代试验有令人信服的理由,但这些论点随着时间的推移发生了很大变化。第二代试验提供了相对较弱的理由,有时甚至没有理由进行试验。如果没有明确和有说服力的理由,继续使用这种研究设计是不道德的。

相似文献

1
A historical review of placebo-controlled, relapse prevention trials in schizophrenia: The loss of clinical equipoise.精神分裂症安慰剂对照复发预防试验的历史回顾:临床均衡的丧失。
Schizophr Res. 2021 Mar;229:122-131. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.11.022. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
2
Is the ongoing use of placebo in relapse-prevention clinical trials in schizophrenia justified?抗精神分裂症复发的临床试验中持续使用安慰剂是否合理?
Schizophr Res. 2013 Nov;150(2-3):427-33. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
3
Relapse prevention in schizophrenia with new-generation antipsychotics: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.新一代抗精神病药物用于精神分裂症的复发预防:一项随机对照试验的系统评价与探索性Meta分析
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Jul;160(7):1209-22. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.7.1209.
4
The Use of Continuous Treatment Versus Placebo or Intermittent Treatment Strategies in Stabilized Patients with Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with First- and Second-Generation Antipsychotics.在病情稳定的精神分裂症患者中使用持续治疗与安慰剂或间歇治疗策略:对使用第一代和第二代抗精神病药物的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
CNS Drugs. 2015 Aug;29(8):637-58. doi: 10.1007/s40263-015-0269-4.
5
Are Placebo-Controlled, Relapse Prevention Trials in Schizophrenia Research Still Necessary or Ethical?在精神分裂症研究中,安慰剂对照的预防复发试验仍然必要或符合伦理道德吗?
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 1;76(7):673-674. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0275.
6
Placebo-controlled trials in schizophrenia: are they ethical? Are they necessary?精神分裂症的安慰剂对照试验:它们符合伦理道德吗?有必要进行吗?
Schizophr Res. 1999 Feb 15;35(3):211-8; discussion 227-36. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(98)00127-3.
7
Maintenance treatment with antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia.使用抗精神病药物对精神分裂症进行维持治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16(5):CD008016. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008016.pub2.
8
Relapse prevention in schizophrenia: evidence from longterm, randomized, double-blind clinical trials.精神分裂症的复发预防:来自长期、随机、双盲临床试验的证据。
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2007 Feb;28 Suppl 1:49-70.
9
Long-term cariprazine treatment for the prevention of relapse in patients with schizophrenia: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.长效卡立普嗪预防精神分裂症患者复发的治疗:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Schizophr Res. 2016 Oct;176(2-3):264-271. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.06.030. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
10
Patient-oriented randomisation: A new trial design applied in the Neuroleptic Strategy Study.以患者为导向的随机分组:一种应用于抗精神病药物策略研究的新试验设计。
Clin Trials. 2016 Jun;13(3):251-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774516639910. Epub 2016 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Antipsychotic Maintenance Treatment for Patients With Schizophrenia: The Need for Placebo-Controlled Trials and The Risk of Paradigm Shifts.精神分裂症患者的抗精神病药物维持治疗:安慰剂对照试验的必要性及范式转变的风险
Schizophr Bull Open. 2022 Oct 18;3(1):sgac058. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac058. eCollection 2022 Jan.
2
Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1 as a Target for the Development of New Antipsychotics: Current Status of Research and Future Directions.追踪胺相关受体 1 作为开发新型抗精神病药物的靶点:研究现状和未来方向。
CNS Drugs. 2021 Nov;35(11):1153-1161. doi: 10.1007/s40263-021-00864-3. Epub 2021 Oct 15.