Stafford Mai, Deeny Sarah R, Dreyer Kathryn, Shand Jenny
The Health Foundation, London, UK
The Health Foundation, London, UK.
BJGP Open. 2021 Apr 26;5(2). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0134. Print 2021 Apr.
The daily management of long-term conditions falls primarily on individuals and informal carers, but the impact of household context on health and social care activity among people with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) is understudied.
To test whether co-residence with a person with MLTCs (compared with a co-resident without MLTCs) is associated with utilisation and cost of primary, community, secondary health care, and formal social care.
DESIGN & SETTING: Linked data from health providers and local government in Barking and Dagenham for a retrospective cohort of people aged ≥50 years in two-person households in 2016-2018.
Two-part regression models were applied to estimate annualised use and cost of hospital, primary, community, mental health, and social care by MLTC status of individuals and co-residents, adjusted for age, sex, and deprivation. Applicability at the national level was tested using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).
Forty-eight per cent of people with MLTCs in two-person households were co-resident with another person with MLTCs. They were 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00 to 1.30) times as likely to have community care activity and 1.24 (95% CI = 0.99 to 1.54) times as likely to have mental health care activity compared with those co-resident with a healthy person. They had more primary care visits (8.5 [95% CI = 8.2 to 8.8] versus 7.9 [95% CI = 7.7 to 8.2]) and higher primary care costs. Outpatient care and elective admissions did not differ. Findings in national data were similar.
Care utilisation for people with MLTCs varies by household context. There may be potential for connecting health and community service input across household members.
长期疾病的日常管理主要由个人和非正式护理人员负责,但家庭环境对患有多种长期疾病(MLTCs)的人群的健康和社会护理活动的影响尚未得到充分研究。
测试与患有MLTCs的人同住(与未患有MLTCs的同住者相比)是否与初级、社区、二级医疗保健以及正式社会护理的使用和成本相关。
来自巴金和达格纳姆的医疗服务提供者和地方政府的关联数据,用于回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2016 - 2018年两人家庭中年龄≥50岁的人群。
应用两部分回归模型,根据个人和同住者的MLTCs状况,估计医院、初级、社区、心理健康和社会护理的年化使用量和成本,并对年龄、性别和贫困程度进行调整。使用临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)测试在国家层面的适用性。
两人家庭中48%患有MLTCs的人与另一位患有MLTCs的人同住。与与健康人同住的人相比,他们进行社区护理活动的可能性是其1.14倍(95%置信区间[CI]=1.00至1.30),进行心理健康护理活动的可能性是其1.24倍(95%CI = 0.99至1.54)。他们的初级保健就诊次数更多(8.5次[95%CI = 8.2至8.8]对7.9次[95%CI = 7.7至8.2]),初级保健成本更高。门诊护理和择期住院情况无差异。国家数据中的结果相似。
患有MLTCs的人的护理利用情况因家庭环境而异。跨家庭成员连接健康和社区服务投入可能具有潜力。