Jain Anu, van Hoek Albert J, Walker Jemma L, Mathur Rohini, Smeeth Liam, Thomas Sara L
Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Statistics, Modelling and Economics Department, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 30;12(11):e0189038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189038. eCollection 2017.
Identification and quantification of health inequities amongst specific social groups is a pre-requisite for designing targeted healthcare interventions. This study investigated the recording of social factors in linked electronic health records (EHR) of individuals aged ≥65 years, to assess the potential of these data to identify the social determinants of disease burden and uptake of healthcare interventions. Methodology was developed for ascertaining social factors recorded on or before a pre-specified index date (01/01/2013) using primary care data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) linked to hospitalisation and deprivation data in a cross-sectional study. Social factors included: religion, ethnicity, immigration status, small area-level deprivation, place of residence (including communal establishments such as care homes), marital status and living arrangements (e.g. living alone, cohabitation). Each social factor was examined for: completeness of recording including improvements in completeness by using other linked EHR, timeliness of recording for factors that might change over time and their representativeness (compared with English 2011 Census data when available). Data for 591,037 individuals from 389 practices from England were analysed. The completeness of recording varied from 1.6% for immigration status to ~80% for ethnicity. Linkages provided the deprivation data (available for 82% individuals) and improved completeness of ethnicity recording from 55% to 79% (when hospitalisation data were added). Data for ethnicity, deprivation, living arrangements and care home residence were comparable to the Census data. For time-varying variables such as residence and living alone, ~60% and ~35% respectively of those with available data, had this information recorded within the last 5 years of the index date. This work provides methods to identify social factors in EHR relevant to older individuals and shows that factors such as ethnicity, deprivation, not living alone, cohabitation and care home residence can be ascertained using these data. Applying these methodologies to routinely collected data could improve surveillance programmes and allow assessment of health equity in specific healthcare studies.
识别和量化特定社会群体之间的健康不平等是设计有针对性的医疗保健干预措施的先决条件。本研究调查了≥65岁个体的关联电子健康记录(EHR)中社会因素的记录情况,以评估这些数据识别疾病负担的社会决定因素和医疗保健干预措施使用情况的潜力。在一项横断面研究中,利用来自临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)的初级保健数据与住院和贫困数据相链接,开发了用于确定在预先指定的索引日期(2013年1月1日)或之前记录的社会因素的方法。社会因素包括:宗教、种族、移民身份、小区域贫困水平、居住地点(包括养老院等公共机构)、婚姻状况和生活安排(例如独居、同居)。对每个社会因素进行了检查:记录的完整性,包括通过使用其他关联的EHR提高完整性;对于可能随时间变化的因素,记录的及时性及其代表性(与2011年英国人口普查数据相比,如有可用数据)。分析了来自英格兰389家医疗机构的591,037名个体的数据。记录的完整性从移民身份的1.6%到种族的约80%不等。链接提供了贫困数据(82%的个体可用),并将种族记录的完整性从55%提高到79%(添加住院数据时)。种族、贫困、生活安排和养老院居住的数据与人口普查数据具有可比性。对于居住和独居等随时间变化的变量,分别约60%和35%有可用数据的人在索引日期的最后5年内记录了这些信息。这项工作提供了识别EHR中与老年人相关的社会因素的方法,并表明可以使用这些数据确定种族、贫困、非独居、同居和养老院居住等因素。将这些方法应用于常规收集的数据可以改善监测计划,并允许在特定的医疗保健研究中评估健康公平性。