• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Anchored Minimal Clinically Important Difference Metrics: Considerations for Bias and Regression to the Mean.锚定最小临床重要差异指标:考虑偏倚和向均数回归的问题。
J Athl Train. 2021 Sep 1;56(9):1042-1049. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0368.20.
2
Preoperative Short Form Health Survey Score Is Predictive of Return to Play and Minimal Clinically Important Difference at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.术前简短健康调查评分可预测前交叉韧带重建术后至少2年随访时的重返运动情况及最小临床重要差异。
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Oct;45(12):2784-2790. doi: 10.1177/0363546517714472. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
3
Clinically Meaningful Improvement After Treatment of Cartilage Defects of the Knee With Osteochondral Grafts.治疗膝关节软骨缺损的骨软骨移植物后具有临床意义的改善。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jan;47(1):71-81. doi: 10.1177/0363546518808030. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
4
The Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit in the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Patients Undergoing Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee.膝关节骨软骨同种异体移植术后患者报告结局测量的最小临床重要差异和实质性临床获益。
Cartilage. 2021 Jan;12(1):42-50. doi: 10.1177/1947603518812552. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
5
The Minimal Clinically Important Difference Changes Greatly Based on the Different Calculation Methods.基于不同的计算方法,最小临床重要差异变化很大。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Mar;51(4):1067-1073. doi: 10.1177/03635465231152484. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
6
Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for Microfracture of the Knee: A Psychometric Analysis at Short-term Follow-up.定义膝关节微骨折的最小临床重要差异和患者可接受的症状状态:短期随访的心理测量分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;48(4):876-883. doi: 10.1177/0363546520903279. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
7
Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis Treated With PRP Injection.接受富血小板血浆注射治疗的膝骨关节炎患者的最小临床重要差异和患者可接受症状状态
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Oct 5;9(10):23259671211026242. doi: 10.1177/23259671211026242. eCollection 2021 Oct.
8
Comparative Effectiveness of Cartilage Repair With Respect to the Minimal Clinically Important Difference.软骨修复的最小临床重要差异的比较效果。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Nov;47(13):3284-3293. doi: 10.1177/0363546518824552. Epub 2019 May 13.
9
What Are the Minimum Clinically Important Differences in SF-36 Scores in Patients with Orthopaedic Oncologic Conditions?骨科肿瘤患者 SF-36 评分的最小临床重要差异是多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2148-2158. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001341.
10
Association Between Preoperative Mental Health and Clinically Meaningful Outcomes After Osteochondral Allograft for Cartilage Defects of the Knee: A Machine Learning Analysis.术前心理健康与膝关节软骨缺损骨软骨同种异体移植术后临床有意义结果的关系:机器学习分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Mar;49(4):948-957. doi: 10.1177/0363546520988021. Epub 2021 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Regression to the Mean: Statistical Bias Can Mislead Interpretation in Cartilage and Osteoarthritis Clinics and Research.均值回归:统计偏差可能会误导软骨与骨关节炎临床及研究中的解读。
Cartilage. 2024 Nov 11:19476035241293048. doi: 10.1177/19476035241293048.
2
Calculation of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) using different methodologies: case study and practical guide.使用不同方法计算最小临床重要差异(MCID):案例研究与实用指南。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Sep;33(9):3388-3400. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08369-5. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
3
Minimal Clinically Important Difference Estimates Are Biased by Adjusting for Baseline Severity, Not by Regression to the Mean.最小临床重要差异估计值受基线严重程度调整的影响而产生偏差,而非受均值回归的影响。
J Athl Train. 2022 Nov 1;57(11-12):1122-1123. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-1006.22.
4
Patient-reported outcome measures as an outcome variable in sports medicine research.患者报告的结局指标作为运动医学研究中的一个结局变量。
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Nov 2;4:1006905. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1006905. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
How can we define clinically important improvement in pain scores after biceps tenodesis?肱二头肌肌腱固定术后疼痛评分的临床显著改善应如何定义?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Feb;30(2):430-438. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.05.038. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
2
PROMIS and FAAM Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Foot and Ankle Orthopedics.PROMIS 和 FAAM 在足踝矫形骨科中的最小临床重要差异。
Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Jan;40(1):65-73. doi: 10.1177/1071100718800304. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
3
Specificity of the minimal clinically important difference of the quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (QDASH) for distal upper extremity conditions.上肢远端疾病中手臂、肩膀和手部快速残疾量表(QDASH)最小临床重要差异的特异性。
J Hand Ther. 2016 Jan-Mar;29(1):81-8; quiz 88. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
4
The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State for the Modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score Among Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement.股骨髋臼撞击症手术治疗患者改良Harris髋关节评分和髋关节结局评分的患者可接受症状状态
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1844-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546515587739. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
5
Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions.确定针对疼痛性骨科疾病的干预措施治疗益处的临床重要性。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Feb 3;10:24. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0144-x.
6
Adjusting for covariates in studies of diagnostic, screening, or prognostic markers: an old concept in a new setting.在诊断、筛查或预后标志物研究中对协变量进行调整:新背景下的一个旧概念。
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Jul 1;168(1):89-97. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn099. Epub 2008 May 13.
7
The inconsistency of "optimal" cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve.使用基于受试者工作特征曲线的两个标准所获得的“最佳”切点的不一致性。
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Apr 1;163(7):670-5. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj063. Epub 2006 Jan 12.
8
Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it.向均值回归:是什么以及如何应对。
Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Feb;34(1):215-20. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh299. Epub 2004 Aug 27.
9
Effect of regression to the mean on decision making in health care.均值回归对医疗保健决策的影响。
BMJ. 2003 May 17;326(7398):1083-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1083.
10
The effect of regression to the mean in epidemiologic and clinical studies.回归均值在流行病学和临床研究中的作用。
Am J Epidemiol. 1976 Nov;104(5):493-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112321.

锚定最小临床重要差异指标:考虑偏倚和向均数回归的问题。

Anchored Minimal Clinically Important Difference Metrics: Considerations for Bias and Regression to the Mean.

机构信息

Defense Health Management Systems, Rosslyn, VA.

Optimum Performance Analytics Associates, Apex, NC.

出版信息

J Athl Train. 2021 Sep 1;56(9):1042-1049. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0368.20.

DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-0368.20
PMID:33237997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8448471/
Abstract

Minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) are used to understand clinical relevance. However, repeated observations produce biased analyses unless one accounts for baseline observation, known as regression to the mean (RTM). Using an International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) survey dataset, we can demonstrate the effect of RTM on MCID values by (1) MCID-estimate dependence on baseline observation and (2) MCID-estimate bias being higher when the posttest-pretest data correlation is lower. We created 10 IKDC datasets with 5000 patients and a specific correlation under both equal and unequal variances. For each 10-point increase in baseline IKDC, MCID decreased by 3.5, 2.7, 1.9, 1.2, and 0.7 points when posttest-pretest correlations were 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 0.90, respectively, under equal variances. Not accounting for RTM resulted in a static 20-point MCID. Minimal clinically important difference estimates may be unreliable. Minimal clinically important difference calculations should include the correlation and variances between posttest and pretest data, and researchers should consider using a baseline covariate-adjusted receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to calculate MCID.

摘要

最小临床重要差异 (MCID) 用于理解临床相关性。然而,如果不考虑基线观察值,即所谓的均数回归 (RTM),则重复观察会产生有偏分析。我们使用国际膝关节文献委员会 (IKDC) 调查数据集,可以通过以下两种方式证明 RTM 对 MCID 值的影响:(1) MCID 估计值对基线观察值的依赖性;(2) 当后测-前测数据相关性较低时,MCID 估计值的偏差更高。我们在等方差和不等方差两种情况下创建了 10 个包含 5000 名患者的 IKDC 数据集和特定相关性。当后测-前测相关性分别为 0.10、0.25、0.50、0.75 和 0.90 时,在等方差条件下,基线 IKDC 每增加 10 分,MCID 分别减少 3.5、2.7、1.9、1.2 和 0.7 分。不考虑 RTM 会导致 MCID 固定为 20 分。最小临床重要差异估计值可能不可靠。最小临床重要差异的计算应包括后测和前测数据之间的相关性和方差,研究人员应考虑使用基线协变量调整的接收者操作特征曲线分析来计算 MCID。