Defense Health Management Systems, Rosslyn, VA.
Optimum Performance Analytics Associates, Apex, NC.
J Athl Train. 2021 Sep 1;56(9):1042-1049. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0368.20.
Minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) are used to understand clinical relevance. However, repeated observations produce biased analyses unless one accounts for baseline observation, known as regression to the mean (RTM). Using an International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) survey dataset, we can demonstrate the effect of RTM on MCID values by (1) MCID-estimate dependence on baseline observation and (2) MCID-estimate bias being higher when the posttest-pretest data correlation is lower. We created 10 IKDC datasets with 5000 patients and a specific correlation under both equal and unequal variances. For each 10-point increase in baseline IKDC, MCID decreased by 3.5, 2.7, 1.9, 1.2, and 0.7 points when posttest-pretest correlations were 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 0.90, respectively, under equal variances. Not accounting for RTM resulted in a static 20-point MCID. Minimal clinically important difference estimates may be unreliable. Minimal clinically important difference calculations should include the correlation and variances between posttest and pretest data, and researchers should consider using a baseline covariate-adjusted receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to calculate MCID.
最小临床重要差异 (MCID) 用于理解临床相关性。然而,如果不考虑基线观察值,即所谓的均数回归 (RTM),则重复观察会产生有偏分析。我们使用国际膝关节文献委员会 (IKDC) 调查数据集,可以通过以下两种方式证明 RTM 对 MCID 值的影响:(1) MCID 估计值对基线观察值的依赖性;(2) 当后测-前测数据相关性较低时,MCID 估计值的偏差更高。我们在等方差和不等方差两种情况下创建了 10 个包含 5000 名患者的 IKDC 数据集和特定相关性。当后测-前测相关性分别为 0.10、0.25、0.50、0.75 和 0.90 时,在等方差条件下,基线 IKDC 每增加 10 分,MCID 分别减少 3.5、2.7、1.9、1.2 和 0.7 分。不考虑 RTM 会导致 MCID 固定为 20 分。最小临床重要差异估计值可能不可靠。最小临床重要差异的计算应包括后测和前测数据之间的相关性和方差,研究人员应考虑使用基线协变量调整的接收者操作特征曲线分析来计算 MCID。