Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Division of Medical Physics, Department of Information Technology and Medical Engineering, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 53 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Phys Med Biol. 2021 Jan 14;66(1):015007. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/abcdeb.
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images acquired during volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT; ii-CBCT) can be used to calculate actual delivered doses (ADDs). However, such ii-CBCT images are degraded by scattered megavoltage x-rays (MV-scatters). We aimed to evaluate the dose calculation accuracy of the MV-scatter uncorrected or corrected ii-CBCT images acquired during VMAT deliveries. For MV-scatter correction on concurrent kilovoltage projections (P ), projections consisting only of MV-scatters (P ) were acquired under the same MV beam parameters and gantry angles and subtracted from P (P ). In addition, the projections by kilovoltage beams were acquired for reference (P ). The corresponding CBCT images were reconstructed using the Feldkamp-Davis-Kress algorithm (CBCT, CBCT, and CBCT as reference). A multi-energy phantom with rods of various relative electron densities (REDs) was used to generate a CBCT-number-to-RED conversion table. First, CBCT was reconstructed. Then, the mean CBCT-numbers within each rod were extracted, and a reference table was generated. Concurrent kilovoltage imaging with various field sizes was also demonstrated, and CBCT and CBCT were reconstructed. The extracted CBCT-numbers of each ii-CBCT image were converted into REDs using the reference table. Next, the absolute differences of RED between the ii-CBCT image and CBCT were calculated. Ten VMAT plans using a 10 MV flattening-filter-free beam were used for concurrent imaging of an anthropomorphic torso phantom. Moreover, an iterative reconstruction algorithm (IRA) was used for CBCT. The plans were recalculated for the corresponding CBCT, CBCT, CBCT, and CBCT with the reference table. Finally, the doses were evaluated using 3D gamma analysis (1%/1 mm). The median difference ranges between CBCT/CBCT and the reference values were -0.58 to -0.10/-0.03 to 0.00. The median gamma pass rates of the doses on CBCT, CBCT, and CBCT to the rate on CBCT were 70.4, 99.5, and 98.2%, respectively. CBCT were comparable with CBCT for calculating the ADD from VMAT.
锥形束 CT(CBCT)图像可用于计算实际的剂量分布(ADD)。然而,这种 CBCT 图像受到散射兆伏射线(MV-scatters)的影响。我们旨在评估容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)期间获取的未经散射校正或经散射校正的 MV-scatter 校正 ii-CBCT 图像的剂量计算准确性。对于 MV-scatter 校正,在相同的 MV 射束参数和机架角度下获取仅包含 MV-scatters 的投影(P ),并从 P 中减去(P )。此外,还获取千伏射线的投影作为参考(P )。使用 Feldkamp-Davis-Kress 算法重建相应的 CBCT 图像(CBCT、CBCT 和 CBCT 作为参考)。使用具有不同相对电子密度(RED)的棒的多能体模生成 CBCT 数到 RED 转换表。首先,重建 CBCT。然后,从每个棒中提取平均 CBCT 数,并生成参考表。还演示了不同射野大小的同步千伏成像,并重建了 CBCT 和 CBCT。使用参考表将每个 ii-CBCT 图像的提取的 CBCT 数转换为 RED。接下来,计算 ii-CBCT 图像与 CBCT 之间的 RED 绝对差异。使用 10 MV 无均整滤过的平坦射束的 10 个 VMAT 计划用于对人体体模进行同步成像。此外,还使用迭代重建算法(IRA)进行 CBCT。对于相应的 CBCT、CBCT、CBCT 和使用参考表的 CBCT,重新计算计划。最后,使用 3D 伽马分析(1%/1mm)评估剂量。CBCT/CBCT 与参考值的中位数差异范围为-0.58 至-0.10/0.03 至 0.00。CBCT、CBCT 和 CBCT 的剂量的中位数伽马通过率分别为 70.4%、99.5%和 98.2%。CBCT 可与 CBCT 相媲美,用于计算 VMAT 的 ADD。