• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲苯胺蓝与冰冻切片在口腔鳞状细胞癌黏膜肿瘤边缘评估中的比较。

Toluidine blue versus frozen section for assessment of mucosal tumor margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hodeidah University, Hodeidah, Yemen.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2020 Nov 25;20(1):1147. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07644-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-020-07644-0
PMID:33238944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7691066/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

When the resected specimen is sent for intraoperative margin assessment, all margins are grossly checked, and selected margins undergo a frozen section (FS) examination. Therefore, there is a possibility of sampling error. This study evaluated the effectiveness of using toluidine blue (TB) as an intraoperative triage screening tool to detect positive mucosal margins of the resected specimens of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and serve as a guide for FS sampling.

METHODS

Surgical samples of 30 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven OSCC were included in the study. A total of 140 mucosal margins were analyzed intraoperatively by TB and FS, the results were compared with the final histopathology.

RESULTS

Of the 140 examined mucosal tumor margins, 14 stained positives with TB, six were true-positives, eight were false-positives, and there were no false-negatives, as confirmed by final histopathology of the same margins. The diagnostic performance measures were sensitivity 100.0%; specificity 94.0%; positive predictive value (PPV) 42.9%; negative predictive value (NPV) 100.0%; and accuracy 94.3% (95% CI: 89.0-97.5%). For FS, there were three true-positives, three false-negatives, and no false-positives. The diagnostic performance measures were sensitivity 50.0%; specificity 100.0%; PPV 100.0%; NPV 97.8%; and accuracy 97.9% (95% CI: 93.9-99.6%).

CONCLUSION

TB is less specific but more sensitive than FS for detecting positive mucosal margins of resected OSCC. Screening the tumor mucosal margins with TB before FS sampling may help identify more tumor-bearing margins.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Registration number: NCT03554967 . Registration date: June 13, 2018.

摘要

背景

当切除的标本被送进行术中切缘评估时,所有切缘都进行了大体检查,并对选定的切缘进行了冰冻切片(FS)检查。因此,存在取样误差的可能性。本研究评估了使用甲苯胺蓝(TB)作为术中分诊筛选工具来检测切除的口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)标本阳性黏膜切缘的有效性,并作为 FS 取样的指导。

方法

研究纳入了 30 例经活检证实的 OSCC 患者的手术样本。共对 140 个黏膜肿瘤边缘进行了 TB 和 FS 的术中分析,结果与最终的组织病理学进行了比较。

结果

在 140 个检查的黏膜肿瘤边缘中,14 个用 TB 染色阳性,6 个为真阳性,8 个为假阳性,没有假阴性,这与同一边缘的最终组织病理学结果一致。诊断性能测量指标为敏感性 100.0%;特异性 94.0%;阳性预测值(PPV)42.9%;阴性预测值(NPV)100.0%;和准确性 94.3%(95%CI:89.0-97.5%)。对于 FS,有 3 个真阳性,3 个假阴性,没有假阳性。诊断性能测量指标为敏感性 50.0%;特异性 100.0%;PPV 100.0%;NPV 97.8%;和准确性 97.9%(95%CI:93.9-99.6%)。

结论

TB 检测切除的 OSCC 阳性黏膜切缘的特异性不如 FS,但敏感性更高。在 FS 取样前用 TB 筛查肿瘤黏膜切缘可能有助于识别更多的肿瘤边缘。

试验注册

该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册。注册号:NCT03554967。注册日期:2018 年 6 月 13 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a035/7691066/68c787a1b6dc/12885_2020_7644_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a035/7691066/6fd4abb0939b/12885_2020_7644_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a035/7691066/bc010f6cec22/12885_2020_7644_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a035/7691066/df119b19e228/12885_2020_7644_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a035/7691066/68c787a1b6dc/12885_2020_7644_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a035/7691066/6fd4abb0939b/12885_2020_7644_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a035/7691066/bc010f6cec22/12885_2020_7644_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a035/7691066/df119b19e228/12885_2020_7644_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a035/7691066/68c787a1b6dc/12885_2020_7644_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Toluidine blue versus frozen section for assessment of mucosal tumor margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma.甲苯胺蓝与冰冻切片在口腔鳞状细胞癌黏膜肿瘤边缘评估中的比较。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Nov 25;20(1):1147. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07644-0.
2
A comparative analysis of toluidine blue with frozen section in oral squamous cell carcinoma.甲苯胺蓝与冰冻切片在口腔鳞状细胞癌中的对比分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2012 Apr 16;10:57. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-57.
3
Does the use of intraoperative frozen section of bone marrow from the cut end of the mandible help assess the adequacy of bone margins following mandibulectomy for oral cancer?术中冰冻切取下颌骨断端骨髓对评估口腔癌下颌骨切除术后骨切缘是否充分的作用?
J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;129(8):1501-1506. doi: 10.1002/jso.27659. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
4
Use of Intraoperative Frozen Section to Assess Final Tumor Margin Status in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.术中冰冻切片在评估口腔鳞状细胞癌手术患者最终肿瘤切缘状态中的应用。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct 1;148(10):911-917. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.2131.
5
Frozen section is not cost beneficial for the assessment of margins in oral cancer.冰冻切片对于评估口腔癌的切缘并无成本效益。
Indian J Cancer. 2019 Jan-Mar;56(1):19-23. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_41_18.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative frozen section for margin evaluation of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.口腔鳞状细胞癌术中冰冻切片切缘评估的诊断准确性。
BMC Res Notes. 2024 Feb 1;17(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06698-8.
7
Association of Main Specimen and Tumor Bed Margin Status With Local Recurrence and Survival in Oral Cancer Surgery.口腔癌手术中主标本和肿瘤床切缘状态与局部复发和生存的关系。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec 1;142(12):1191-1198. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2329.
8
Accuracy of frozen sections in assessing margins in oral cancer resection.冰冻切片在评估口腔癌切除切缘中的准确性。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997 Jul;55(7):663-9; discussion 669-71. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(97)90570-x.
9
Accuracy of Frozen Section Examination in Oral Cavity Cancers.口腔癌冰冻切片检查的准确性。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2022 Sep;101(8):NP354-NP357. doi: 10.1177/0145561320967334. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
10
Intraoperative imprint evaluation of surgical margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma.口腔鳞状细胞癌手术切缘的术中印记评估
Acta Cytol. 2013;57(1):75-83. doi: 10.1159/000342916. Epub 2012 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Diagnostic Potential of Non-Invasive Tools for Oral Cancer and Precancer: A Systematic Review.口腔癌及癌前病变非侵入性检测工具的诊断潜力:一项系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 13;14(18):2033. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14182033.
2
Feasibility of an MR-based digital specimen for tongue cancer resection specimens: a novel approach for margin evaluation.基于磁共振成像的舌癌切除标本数字标本的可行性:一种切缘评估的新方法。
Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 28;14:1342857. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1342857. eCollection 2024.
3
Intraoperative Techniques That Define the Mucosal Margins of Oral Cancer In-Vivo: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
A personalized computational model predicts cancer risk level of oral potentially malignant disorders and its web application for promotion of non-invasive screening.一种个性化的计算模型预测口腔潜在恶性疾病的癌症风险水平及其用于促进非侵入性筛查的网络应用。
J Oral Pathol Med. 2020 May;49(5):417-426. doi: 10.1111/jop.12983. Epub 2020 Jan 4.
2
A novel integrated platform for the identification of surgical margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma: results from a prospective single-institution series.一种用于识别口腔鳞状细胞癌手术切缘的新型综合平台:来自前瞻性单机构系列研究的结果。
BMC Cancer. 2019 May 17;19(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5634-0.
3
确定口腔癌体内黏膜边缘的术中技术:一项系统综述。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 14;16(6):1148. doi: 10.3390/cancers16061148.
4
Biochemical implications of robotic surgery: a new frontier in the operating room.机器人手术的生化意义:手术室的新前沿。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 24;18(1):91. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01861-6.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative frozen section for margin evaluation of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.口腔鳞状细胞癌术中冰冻切片切缘评估的诊断准确性。
BMC Res Notes. 2024 Feb 1;17(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06698-8.
6
Molecular Research on Oral Diseases and Related Biomaterials: A Journey from Oral Cell Models to Advanced Regenerative Perspectives.口腔疾病与相关生物材料的分子研究:从口腔细胞模型到先进的再生视角。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 May 9;23(9):5288. doi: 10.3390/ijms23095288.
7
Fluorescent Molecular Imaging Can Improve Intraoperative Sentinel Margin Detection in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.荧光分子成像可提高口腔鳞状细胞癌术中前哨切缘检测的准确性。
J Nucl Med. 2022 Aug;63(8):1162-1168. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262235. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
Surgical margins in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: Current practices and future directions.
口腔鳞状细胞癌的手术切缘:当前的实践与未来方向。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Jan;130(1):128-138. doi: 10.1002/lary.27943. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
4
Frozen sections and complete resection in oral cancer surgery.口腔癌手术中的冰冻切片和完整切除。
Oral Dis. 2019 Jul;25(5):1309-1317. doi: 10.1111/odi.13101. Epub 2019 Apr 21.
5
Surgical margins in oral squamous cell cancer: intraoperative evaluation and prognostic impact.口腔鳞状细胞癌的手术切缘:术中评估及预后影响
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Apr;27(2):98-103. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000516.
6
[GLOBAL INCIDENCE AND RISK FACTORS OF ORAL CANCER].[口腔癌的全球发病率及风险因素]
Harefuah. 2017 Oct;156(10):645-649.
7
Frozen Section Evaluation of Margin Status in Primary Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck: A Correlation Study of Frozen Section and Final Diagnoses.头颈部原发性鳞状细胞癌切缘状态的冰冻切片评估:冰冻切片与最终诊断的相关性研究
Head Neck Pathol. 2018 Jun;12(2):175-180. doi: 10.1007/s12105-017-0846-6. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
8
Treatment guidelines and patterns of care in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: Primary surgical resection vs. nonsurgical treatment.口腔鳞状细胞癌的治疗指南和护理模式:主要手术切除与非手术治疗。
Oral Oncol. 2017 Aug;71:129-137. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
9
Accuracy of frozen sections in oral cancer resections, an experience of a tertiary care hospital.口腔癌切除术冰冻切片的准确性:一家三级护理医院的经验
J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 May;67(5):806-809.
10
Intraoperative gross examination vs frozen section for achievement of adequate margin in oral cancer surgery.口腔癌手术中实现足够切缘的术中大体检查与冰冻切片检查对比
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017 May;123(5):544-549. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2016.11.018. Epub 2016 Dec 7.