• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

组织弹性:从计划驱动的业务连续性管理转向预期的即兴创作。

Organisational resilience: Shifting from planning-driven business continuity management to anticipated improvisation.

机构信息

The Hague University of Applied Sciences.

Radboud University Nijmegen.

出版信息

J Bus Contin Emer Plan. 2020 Jan 1;14(2):102-109.

PMID:33239142
Abstract

As unpredictable major-impact events are on the rise, many organisations have adopted an organisational resilience (OR) approach for dealing with these so-called 'black swan events. What OR comprises is subject to ambiguity and multiple interpretations. This article presents a perspective that makes a distinction between predictable risks and unpredictable major-impact events. The article argues that predictable risks would benefit from an adaptive and efficient business continuity management (BCM) capability. Using several cases, the article demonstrates how the adaptability and efficiency of BCM can be improved in practice. For unpredictable events, this article calls for a strategy of anticipated improvisation. Both strategies necessitate executives and regulators to accept less planning and to put more trust in the expertise of specialists and managers.

摘要

随着不可预测的重大影响事件的不断增加,许多组织已经采取了组织弹性(OR)方法来应对这些所谓的“黑天鹅事件”。OR 包含的内容存在模糊性和多种解释。本文提出了一种区分可预测风险和不可预测重大影响事件的观点。文章认为,可预测的风险将受益于适应性强且高效的业务连续性管理(BCM)能力。本文通过几个案例展示了如何在实践中提高 BCM 的适应性和效率。对于不可预测的事件,本文呼吁采取预期即兴创作的策略。这两种策略都需要高管和监管机构减少规划,并更多地信任专家和经理的专业知识。

相似文献

1
Organisational resilience: Shifting from planning-driven business continuity management to anticipated improvisation.组织弹性:从计划驱动的业务连续性管理转向预期的即兴创作。
J Bus Contin Emer Plan. 2020 Jan 1;14(2):102-109.
2
Building adaptive business continuity plans: Practical tips on how to inject adaptiveness into continuity planning processes.建立适应性业务连续性计划:将适应性注入连续性规划流程的实用技巧。
J Bus Contin Emer Plan. 2021 Jan 1;15(1):44-52.
3
Business continuity management as an operational risk service provider: An approach to organisational resilience.作为运营风险服务提供商的业务连续性管理:一种实现组织韧性的方法。
J Bus Contin Emer Plan. 2019 Jan 1;13(2):102-110.
4
Leveraging business continuity management for climate-related financial reporting.利用业务连续性管理进行气候相关财务报告。
J Bus Contin Emer Plan. 2023 Jan 1;17(2):102-115.
5
Assessing the KING IV Corporate Governance Report in relation to business continuity and resilience.评估《金氏公司治理报告》中与业务连续性和恢复力相关的内容。
J Bus Contin Emer Plan. 2019 Jan 1;13(2):174-185.
6
Organisational performance and business continuity management: a theoretical perspective and a case study.组织绩效与业务连续性管理:理论视角与案例研究
J Bus Contin Emer Plan. 2013 Summer;6(4):360-73.
7
What makes for effective business continuity implementation?有效的业务连续性实施的关键因素是什么?
J Bus Contin Emer Plan. 2022 Jan 1;15(4):302-311.
8
A winning combination: the 3Cs of business continuity.成功组合:业务连续性的3C要素
J Bus Contin Emer Plan. 2013 Autumn;7(1):44-55.
9
The silent assassin: Business demand changes following disaster.沉默的杀手:灾难后商业需求的变化
J Bus Contin Emer Plan. 2018 Jan 1;12(1):79-93.
10
Business continuity 2014: From traditional to integrated Business Continuity Management.2014年业务连续性:从传统到集成式业务连续性管理
J Bus Contin Emer Plan. 2014;8(2):102-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrated security management model: a proposal applied to organisational resilience.综合安全管理模型:一项应用于组织韧性的提议
Secur J. 2023 Jun 2:1-24. doi: 10.1057/s41284-023-00381-6.
2
Cyber resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis: A case study.新冠疫情危机期间的网络弹性:一项案例研究。
J Conting Crisis Manag. 2021 Dec;29(4):439-444. doi: 10.1111/1468-5973.12360. Epub 2021 May 1.