Maximizing maternal health and value for money in postpartum depression screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis using the All Our Families cohort and administrative data in Alberta, Canada.

BACKGROUND

Postpartum depression (PPD) affects 10-15% of women, is costly and debilitating, yet often remains undiagnosed. Within Alberta, Canada, screening is conducted at public health well child clinics using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. If screened high-risk, women are offered referral to their family physicians for follow up diagnosis and treatment.

METHODS

We developed a decision tree to estimate the cost-effectiveness of PPD screening versus not screening in Alberta over a two-year time horizon using a public healthcare payer perspective. Both the current practice (51% attending referral) and a scenario analysis (100% attending referral) are presented.

RESULTS

Current practice results suggest screening leads to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $17,644 USD per quality adjusted life year (QALY). At a population-level, this resulted in an annual 813 (11%) additional cases diagnosed, 120 additional QALYs gained, and an additional cost of $2.1 million relative to not screening. With 100% attending referral, the ICER fell to $13,908 per QALY, resulting in an annual 1997 (27%) additional cases diagnosed, 249 additional QALYs gained, and an additional cost of $3.5 million relative to not screening.

LIMITATIONS

We were unable to explore the cost-effectiveness of PPD screening versus not screening for secondary populations, including children.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest screening may be most valuable when participation and compliance are maximized, where all women screened high-risk attend referral. This leads to greater value for money and increased maternal health gains across the population. Collaboration among public health and primary care services is encouraged to improve outcomes.