Suppr超能文献

严重联合免疫缺陷(NBS SCID)新生儿筛查异常的随访:临床免疫学会(CIS)现行做法调查

Follow-Up for an Abnormal Newborn Screen for Severe Combined Immunodeficiencies (NBS SCID): A Clinical Immunology Society (CIS) Survey of Current Practices.

作者信息

Knight Vijaya, Heimall Jennifer R, Wright Nicola, Dutmer Cullen M, Boyce Thomas G, Torgerson Troy R, Abraham Roshini S

机构信息

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perlman School of Medicine at University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Int J Neonatal Screen. 2020 Jun 30;6(3):52. doi: 10.3390/ijns6030052.

Abstract

Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) includes a group of monogenic disorders presenting with severe T cell lymphopenia (TCL) and high mortality, if untreated. The newborn screen (NBS) for SCID, included in the recommended universal screening panel (RUSP), has been widely adopted across the US and in many other countries. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding follow-up testing to confirm an abnormal result. The Clinical Immunology Society (CIS) membership was surveyed for confirmatory testing practices for an abnormal NBS SCID result, which included consideration of gestational age and birth weight, as well as flow cytometry panels. Considerable variability was observed in follow-up practices for an abnormal NBS SCID with 49% confirming by flow cytometry, 39% repeating TREC analysis, and the remainder either taking prematurity into consideration for subsequent testing or proceeding directly to genetic analysis. More than 50% of respondents did not take prematurity into consideration when determining follow-up. Confirmation of abnormal NBS SCID in premature infants continues to be challenging and is handled variably across centers, with some choosing to repeat NBS SCID testing until normal or until the infant reaches an adjusted gestational age of 37 weeks. A substantial proportion of respondents included naïve and memory T cell analysis with T, B, and NK lymphocyte subset quantitation in the initial confirmatory panel. These results have the potential to influence the diagnosis and management of an infant with TCL as illustrated by the clinical cases presented herein. Our data indicate that there is clearly a strong need for harmonization of follow-up testing for an abnormal NBS SCID result.

摘要

重症联合免疫缺陷(SCID)包括一组单基因疾病,若不治疗,会出现严重的T细胞淋巴细胞减少症(TCL)并导致高死亡率。新生儿重症联合免疫缺陷筛查(NBS)已被纳入推荐的通用筛查项目(RUSP),在美国和许多其他国家广泛采用。然而,对于后续检测以确认异常结果,目前尚无共识。我们对临床免疫学会(CIS)成员就NBS SCID异常结果的确诊检测方法进行了调查,其中包括考虑胎龄和出生体重以及流式细胞术检测项目。对于NBS SCID异常结果的后续检测方法存在很大差异,49%的人通过流式细胞术进行确认,39%的人重复TREC分析,其余的人要么在后续检测中考虑早产因素,要么直接进行基因分析。超过50%的受访者在确定后续检测时未考虑早产因素。早产儿NBS SCID异常结果的确认仍然具有挑战性,各中心的处理方式各不相同,一些中心选择重复NBS SCID检测,直到结果正常或婴儿达到37周的矫正胎龄。相当一部分受访者在初始确诊检测项目中纳入了幼稚和记忆T细胞分析以及T、B和NK淋巴细胞亚群定量检测。如本文所呈现的临床病例所示,这些结果可能会影响TCL婴儿的诊断和管理。我们的数据表明,对于NBS SCID异常结果的后续检测,显然迫切需要进行统一规范。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验