University of Primorska, Faculty of Health Sciences, Izola, Slovenia.
University of Primorska, Andrej Marušič Institute, Koper, Slovenia.
J Sports Sci Med. 2020 Nov 19;19(4):745-752. eCollection 2020 Dec.
In this study, we investigated the prevalence of inter-limb asymmetries in young volleyball players and assessed the differences in the outcomes of different strength and power tests. The study sample comprised of 54 young volleyball players (25 males). Both limbs were tested for single-leg jumping for distance (forward and lateral single jump and triple jump forward for distance), single-leg vertical counter-movement jump (CMJ), change-of-direction (CoD) ability with 90 and 180° turn tests, unilateral maximal isometric knee extension torque, rate of torque development (RTD), and rate of torque development scaling factor (RTD-SF). For all tests, inter-limb asymmetry indexes were calculated. The average magnitude of the inter-limb asymmetries varied substantially (2.0-31.2 %) among different outcome measures. The agreement in the categorization of participants into ''symmetrical'' or ''asymmetrical'', based on the >10% threshold, was very poor in general, with the exception of the outcomes within the same task (e.g. CMJ power and CMJ force). Similar findings were found for the agreement on the direction of the asymmetries. Inter-limb asymmetry in RTD-SF was weakly associated with the CoD performance (r = 0.30; p = 0.031). Multiple strength and power testing protocols are needed to obtain a comprehensive overview of athlete's imbalances. The commonly accepted 10 % threshold for classification of individuals as asymmetrical should be reconsidered and reinvestigated. RFD-SF is suggested as a novel outcome measure that can provide additional information to researchers and coaches.
在这项研究中,我们调查了年轻排球运动员四肢间的不对称性的流行程度,并评估了不同力量和功率测试结果的差异。研究样本包括 54 名年轻排球运动员(25 名男性)。对双腿进行单腿跳跃距离测试(向前和侧向单跳以及向前三级跳)、单腿垂直反向跳跃(CMJ)、90°和 180°变向能力测试(90°和 180°转身测试)、单侧最大等长膝关节伸展扭矩、扭矩发展率(RTD)和扭矩发展率缩放因子(RTD-SF)。对于所有测试,计算四肢间不对称指数。不同结果测量之间的四肢间不对称程度差异很大(2.0-31.2%)。基于>10%的阈值,将参与者分为“对称”或“不对称”类别的分类一致性通常很差,除了同一任务内的结果(例如 CMJ 功率和 CMJ 力)。在不对称方向的一致性上也发现了类似的结果。RTD-SF 中的四肢间不对称与 CoD 表现呈弱相关(r = 0.30;p = 0.031)。需要进行多种力量和功率测试方案,才能全面了解运动员的不平衡。对于将个体分类为不对称的 10%的常见接受阈值应重新考虑和重新研究。RFD-SF 被建议作为一种新的结果测量指标,可以为研究人员和教练提供额外的信息。