Suppr超能文献

肺毛细血管楔压报告仍有改进空间:对一家大型学术医疗中心血流动力学描记图的回顾

Room for improvement in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure reporting: a review of hemodynamic tracings at a large academic medical center.

作者信息

Johnson Shelsey W, Witkin Alison, Rodriguez-Lopez Josanna, Channick Richard

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Pulm Circ. 2020 Nov 11;10(4):2045894020929157. doi: 10.1177/2045894020929157. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

To describe the frequency with which pulmonary capillary wedge pressure measurements, obtained during right heart catheterization, are falsely elevated and to educate operators on techniques to improve accuracy of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure reporting. Failure to completely occlude pulmonary artery branch vessels during balloon inflation can lead to falsely elevated, "incomplete" pulmonary capillary wedge pressures. Balloon deflation prior to catheter retraction may result in catheter advancement into smaller branch vessels, yielding an inadvertent but more accurate alternative pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. We hypothesized that this phenomenon can be identified on retrospective review of right heart catheterization tracings, which occurs commonly and goes unrecognized by operators. We conducted a retrospective study of patients undergoing right heart catheterization or right heart catheterization and left heart catheterization with computer-generated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ≥20 from January 2015 to June 2017. Alternative pulmonary capillary wedge pressures were defined as a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure trace during balloon deflation ≥3 mmHg lower than the reported pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Inter-rater reliability of tracing reviewers was also evaluated. Results showed that, of the 182 tracings reviewed, an alternative pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was identified in 26 or 14.3% of cases. Eleven of these alternative pulmonary capillary wedge pressures were ≤15 mmHg with a calculated pulmonary vascular resistance ≥3 Wood units in 10 patients, re-classifying the etiology of pulmonary hypertension from post-capillary to pre-capillary in 38.5% of cases. For the eight patients for whom left heart catheterization data were available, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure aligned with the alternative pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. In conclusion, inadvertently obtained, but likely more accurate, alternative pulmonary capillary wedge pressures were identified in almost 15% of procedures reviewed from a busy academic institution. As wedge pressures often drive diagnosis and treatment decisions for patients with cardiac and pulmonary pathology, operators should be attuned to balloon deflation as a time when alternative pulmonary capillary wedge pressures may be identified as they are likely more reflective of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. Additional tools to ensure accuracy of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure reporting are reviewed.

摘要

描述右心导管检查期间获得的肺毛细血管楔压测量值被错误抬高的频率,并就提高肺毛细血管楔压报告准确性的技术对操作人员进行培训。球囊充气时未能完全阻塞肺动脉分支血管可导致肺毛细血管楔压被错误抬高,即“不完全”肺毛细血管楔压。导管回撤前球囊放气可能导致导管进入更小的分支血管,从而产生一个无意但更准确的替代肺毛细血管楔压。我们假设这种现象可以通过回顾性分析右心导管检查记录来识别,这种现象很常见,但操作人员并未意识到。我们对2015年1月至2017年6月期间接受右心导管检查或右心导管检查及左心导管检查且计算机生成的肺毛细血管楔压≥20的患者进行了一项回顾性研究。替代肺毛细血管楔压定义为球囊放气期间的肺毛细血管楔压记录比报告的肺毛细血管楔压低≥3 mmHg。还评估了记录审阅者之间的评分者间信度。结果显示,在182份审阅的记录中,26份(14.3%)病例识别出了替代肺毛细血管楔压。其中11份替代肺毛细血管楔压≤15 mmHg,10例患者的计算肺血管阻力≥3伍德单位,38.5%的病例将肺动脉高压的病因从毛细血管后性重新分类为毛细血管前性。对于有左心导管检查数据的8例患者,左心室舒张末期压力与替代肺毛细血管楔压一致。总之,在一家繁忙的学术机构审阅的近15%的操作中识别出了无意中获得但可能更准确的替代肺毛细血管楔压。由于楔压常常驱动心脏和肺部疾病患者的诊断和治疗决策,操作人员应注意球囊放气这一可能识别出替代肺毛细血管楔压的时机,因为它们可能更能反映左心室舒张末期压力。还回顾了确保肺毛细血管楔压报告准确性的其他工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38eb/7672742/0ae816133d2f/10.1177_2045894020929157-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验