Wang Chengdi, Wu Yuxuan, Li Jingwei, Ren Pengwei, Gou Ya, Shao Jun, Zhou Yaojie, Xiao Xue, Tuersun Paierhati, Liu Dan, Zhang Li, Li Weimin
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Precision Medicine Center, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Sep;8(18):1133. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4971.
This study was to investigate the prognostic value of ground-glass opacity(GGO) components and to evaluate distinct the clinicopathological variables of survival outcomes for the pure-GGO, part-solid and solid groups of patients with resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
We retrospectively reviewed the structured data for stage I NSCLC patients who had undergone the curative-intent surgical resection in the Lung Cancer Database of West China Hospital from 2009 to 2016. The eligible patients were divided into the pure-GGO, part-solid and solid groups according to the radiological manifestation. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed between the 3 groups. And we further evaluated the clinicopathological variables in each group separately.
Among a total of 2,775 eligible patients enrolled into the cohort were 1,587 (57.19%) in the solid group, 508 (18.31%) in the part-solid group, and 680 (24.50%) in the pure-GGO group. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 98.8% and 98.0% in the pure-GGO group, 96.0% and 86.5% in the part-solid group, and 88.0% and 75.5% in the solid group, respectively (P<0.001). Presence of GGO components was a significantly favorable prognosticator (HR =0.415, 95% CI: 0.286-0.601). Different groups had distinct prognostic factors. LVI was the shared risk factor for groups with presence of GGO components in both part-solid and pure-GGO groups. Pathological stage (IA or IB) was influential exclusively for the pure-GGO group. In the solid group, females, younger patients, and patients without VPI had better survival. But such independent significance did not exist in the other two groups.
GGO component was a strong prognosticator of better prognosis in resected patients with stage I NSCLC. Prognostic factors and survival outcomes were disparate among the pure-GGO, part-solid, and solid group. Our results support the proposal that the next edition tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification should consider the importance of GGO components as a new T descriptor.
本研究旨在探讨磨玻璃影(GGO)成分的预后价值,并评估I期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者纯GGO、部分实性和实性组生存结局的不同临床病理变量。
我们回顾性分析了2009年至2016年在华西医院肺癌数据库中接受根治性手术切除的I期NSCLC患者的结构化数据。根据影像学表现将符合条件的患者分为纯GGO组、部分实性组和实性组。对这3组进行单因素和多因素Cox回归分析。我们还分别进一步评估了每组的临床病理变量。
在纳入队列的2775例符合条件的患者中,实性组1587例(57.19%),部分实性组508例(18.31%),纯GGO组680例(24.50%)。纯GGO组的5年总生存率(OS)和无复发生存率(RFS)分别为98.8%和98.0%,部分实性组为96.0%和86.5%,实性组为88.0%和75.5%(P<0.001)。GGO成分的存在是一个显著有利的预后因素(HR =0.415,95%CI:0.286-0.601)。不同组有不同预后因素。淋巴管侵犯(LVI)是部分实性组和纯GGO组中存在GGO成分的组的共同危险因素。病理分期(IA或IB)仅对纯GGO组有影响。在实性组中,女性、年轻患者和无脉管侵犯(VPI)的患者生存较好。但在其他两组中不存在这种独立意义。
GGO成分是I期NSCLC切除患者预后较好的有力预后因素。纯GGO组、部分实性组和实性组的预后因素和生存结局各不相同。我们的结果支持下一版肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)分类应考虑GGO成分作为新的T描述符的重要性这一建议。