Jones Jordan T, Smith Chelsey, Becker Mara L, Lovell Daniel
Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
Duke Children's Hospital, Durham, North Carolina.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Dec;73(12):1739-1745. doi: 10.1002/acr.24418.
Down syndrome-associated arthritis (DA) is underrecognized, and current therapies used for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) appear to be poorly tolerated and less effective in patients with DA. The objective of this study was to characterize clinical manifestations and therapeutic preferences in DA compared to JIA, using the new Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (nCARRA) registry.
In a case-control study, between July 2015 and March 2019, patients with a diagnosis of JIA and Down syndrome (DS) were identified and matched by age, sex, and JIA subtype to patients who have JIA without DS. Collected data included demographic characteristics, disease characteristics, laboratory results, treatment exposure, and outcome measures.
A total of 36 children with DA and 165 with JIA were identified. Most patients presented with polyarticular rheumatoid factor-negative disease. At entry into the nCARRA registry, there were minimal differences between the groups, and at the last visit there were significant differences (P < 0.05) for multiple outcome measures. Patients with DA and those with JIA had similar therapeutic exposure to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologics, but those with DA had more DMARD-related adverse events (93% versus 25%) and biologic therapy ineffectiveness (60% versus 17%).
There was little difference between patients with DA and those with JIA at baseline, and similar therapy was implemented for those in the nCARRA registry; however, at the last visit, the patients with DA had greater disease burden. Additionally, there were more DMARD-related adverse events and biologic ineffectiveness for those patients with DA. More research is needed to determine differences in pathophysiology and optimal therapeutic approaches.
唐氏综合征相关关节炎(DA)未得到充分认识,目前用于青少年特发性关节炎(JIA)的疗法在DA患者中似乎耐受性差且效果不佳。本研究的目的是利用新的儿童关节炎和风湿病研究联盟(nCARRA)登记系统,比较DA与JIA的临床表现和治疗偏好。
在一项病例对照研究中,2015年7月至2019年3月期间,确诊为JIA且患有唐氏综合征(DS)的患者被识别出来,并按年龄、性别和JIA亚型与未患DS的JIA患者进行匹配。收集的数据包括人口统计学特征、疾病特征、实验室检查结果、治疗暴露情况和结局指标。
共识别出36例DA患儿和165例JIA患儿。大多数患者表现为多关节型类风湿因子阴性疾病。进入nCARRA登记系统时,两组之间差异极小,而在最后一次随访时,多项结局指标存在显著差异(P<0.05)。DA患者和JIA患者接受改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARDs)和生物制剂治疗的情况相似,但DA患者发生更多与DMARD相关的不良事件(93%对25%)和生物治疗无效情况(60%对17%)。
DA患者与JIA患者在基线时差异不大,nCARRA登记系统中的患者接受了相似的治疗;然而,在最后一次随访时,DA患者的疾病负担更重。此外,DA患者发生更多与DMARD相关的不良事件和生物治疗无效情况。需要更多研究来确定病理生理学差异和最佳治疗方法。