• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝叶斯自适应决策理论设计在多臂多阶段临床试验中的应用。

Bayesian adaptive decision-theoretic designs for multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):717-730. doi: 10.1177/0962280220973697. Epub 2020 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1177/0962280220973697
PMID:33243087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8008394/
Abstract

Multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials in which more than two drugs are simultaneously investigated provide gains over separate single- or two-arm trials. In this paper we propose a generic Bayesian adaptive decision-theoretic design for multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials with () arms. The basic idea is that after each stage a decision about continuation of the trial and accrual of patients for an additional stage is made on the basis of the expected reduction in loss. For this purpose, we define a loss function that incorporates the patient accrual costs as well as costs associated with an incorrect decision at the end of the trial. An attractive feature of our loss function is that its estimation is computationally undemanding, also when >2. We evaluate the frequentist operating characteristics for settings with a binary outcome and multiple experimental arms. We consider both the situation with and without a control arm. In a simulation study, we show that our design increases the probability of making a correct decision at the end of the trial as compared to nonadaptive designs and adaptive two-stage designs.

摘要

多臂多阶段临床试验中同时研究两种以上药物提供了比单独的单臂或双臂试验更多的收益。本文提出了一种通用的贝叶斯自适应决策理论设计,用于具有 () 臂的多臂多阶段临床试验。基本思想是,在每一个阶段之后,根据预期的损失减少,基于预期的损失减少,对继续试验和为下一个阶段招募患者做出决定。为此,我们定义了一个损失函数,该函数将患者招募成本以及与试验结束时错误决策相关的成本纳入其中。我们的损失函数的一个吸引人的特点是,即使 >2,其估计的计算量也不大。我们评估了具有二项结果和多个实验臂的设置的频率操作特性。我们考虑了有无对照臂的情况。在一项模拟研究中,我们表明,与非自适应设计和自适应两阶段设计相比,我们的设计提高了在试验结束时做出正确决策的概率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b019/8008394/d52caa8c5e67/10.1177_0962280220973697-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b019/8008394/b414c3c648ad/10.1177_0962280220973697-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b019/8008394/013521976dea/10.1177_0962280220973697-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b019/8008394/bc99377a22d8/10.1177_0962280220973697-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b019/8008394/d52caa8c5e67/10.1177_0962280220973697-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b019/8008394/b414c3c648ad/10.1177_0962280220973697-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b019/8008394/013521976dea/10.1177_0962280220973697-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b019/8008394/bc99377a22d8/10.1177_0962280220973697-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b019/8008394/d52caa8c5e67/10.1177_0962280220973697-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Bayesian adaptive decision-theoretic designs for multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials.贝叶斯自适应决策理论设计在多臂多阶段临床试验中的应用。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):717-730. doi: 10.1177/0962280220973697. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
2
Simulation optimization for Bayesian multi-arm multi-stage clinical trial with binary endpoints.具有二元终点的贝叶斯多臂多阶段临床试验的模拟优化
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(2):306-317. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1577682. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
3
Bayesian adaptive designs for multi-arm trials: an orthopaedic case study.贝叶斯自适应设计在多臂试验中的应用:骨科案例研究。
Trials. 2020 Jan 14;21(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-4021-0.
4
Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.基于二次损失函数的贝叶斯决策理论组序贯临床试验设计:频率学派评估
Clin Trials. 2007;4(1):5-14. doi: 10.1177/1740774506075764.
5
Accelerating clinical development of HIV vaccine strategies: methodological challenges and considerations in constructing an optimised multi-arm phase I/II trial design.加速 HIV 疫苗策略的临床开发:构建优化的多臂 I/II 期试验设计中的方法学挑战和考虑因素。
Trials. 2014 Feb 26;15:68. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-68.
6
A Bayesian multi-arm multi-stage clinical trial design incorporating information about treatment ordering.一种贝叶斯多臂多阶段临床试验设计,纳入了关于治疗顺序的信息。
Stat Med. 2023 Jul 20;42(16):2841-2854. doi: 10.1002/sim.9752. Epub 2023 May 9.
7
A comparison of Bayesian adaptive randomization and multi-stage designs for multi-arm clinical trials.贝叶斯适应性随机化与多阶段设计在多臂临床试验中的比较。
Stat Med. 2014 Jun 15;33(13):2206-21. doi: 10.1002/sim.6086. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
8
Adaptive treatment allocation and selection in multi-arm clinical trials: a Bayesian perspective.多臂临床试验中的适应性治疗分配和选择:贝叶斯视角。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Feb 20;22(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01526-8.
9
Bayesian designs and the control of frequentist characteristics: a practical solution.贝叶斯设计与频率论特征的控制:一种实用解决方案。
Biometrics. 2015 Mar;71(1):218-226. doi: 10.1111/biom.12226. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
10
Evaluation of a multi-arm multi-stage Bayesian design for phase II drug selection trials - an example in hemato-oncology.用于II期药物筛选试验的多臂多阶段贝叶斯设计评估——血液肿瘤学中的一个例子
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Jun 2;16:67. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0166-7.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of alternative ranking methods in two-stage clinical trials with multiple interventions: An application to the anxiolysis for laceration repair in children trial.两阶段多干预临床试验中替代排序方法的比较:在儿童撕裂伤修复抗焦虑试验中的应用
Clin Trials. 2024 May 21;21(6):17407745241251812. doi: 10.1177/17407745241251812.
2
Being Bayesian in the 2020s: opportunities and challenges in the practice of modern applied Bayesian statistics.21 世纪的贝叶斯主义者:现代应用贝叶斯统计学实践中的机遇与挑战。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023 May 15;381(2247):20220156. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2022.0156. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Modified power prior with multiple historical trials for binary endpoints.基于多个历史试验的二元结局改良功效先验。
Stat Med. 2019 Mar 30;38(7):1147-1169. doi: 10.1002/sim.8019. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
2
A simulation study of outcome adaptive randomization in multi-arm clinical trials.多臂临床试验中结局自适应随机化的模拟研究。
Clin Trials. 2017 Oct;14(5):432-440. doi: 10.1177/1740774517692302. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
3
Many-to-one comparisons after safety selection in multi-arm clinical trials.多臂临床试验中安全性筛选后的多对一比较。
Adaptive treatment allocation and selection in multi-arm clinical trials: a Bayesian perspective.
多臂临床试验中的适应性治疗分配和选择:贝叶斯视角。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Feb 20;22(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01526-8.
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 26;12(6):e0180131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180131. eCollection 2017.
4
Adaptive power priors with empirical Bayes for clinical trials.用于临床试验的具有经验贝叶斯的自适应功率先验
Pharm Stat. 2017 Sep;16(5):349-360. doi: 10.1002/pst.1814. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
5
Controlling the family-wise error rate in multi-arm, multi-stage trials.在多臂多阶段试验中控制家族性错误率。
Clin Trials. 2017 Jun;14(3):237-245. doi: 10.1177/1740774517694130. Epub 2017 Mar 19.
6
Design and monitoring of multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials.多臂多阶段临床试验的设计与监测
Biometrics. 2017 Dec;73(4):1289-1299. doi: 10.1111/biom.12687. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
7
Effects and moderators of exercise on quality of life and physical function in patients with cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis of 34 RCTs.运动对癌症患者生活质量和身体功能的影响及其调节因素:34 项 RCT 的个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2017 Jan;52:91-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
8
Multi-arm group sequential designs with a simultaneous stopping rule.具有同步停止规则的多臂成组序贯设计。
Stat Med. 2016 Dec 30;35(30):5536-5550. doi: 10.1002/sim.7077. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
9
Type I error rates of multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials: strong control and impact of intermediate outcomes.多臂多阶段临床试验的I型错误率:严格控制与中间结果的影响
Trials. 2016 Jul 2;17(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1382-5.
10
Designing multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials using a risk-benefit criterion for treatment selection.使用治疗选择的风险效益标准设计多臂多阶段临床试验。
Stat Med. 2016 Feb 20;35(4):522-33. doi: 10.1002/sim.6760. Epub 2015 Oct 12.