Meylan P R
Hôpital le Samaritain, Vevey.
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1987 Dec 12;117(50):2013-6.
While transparent polyurethane dressings are increasingly used for the care of intravenous catheters, concern has recently been expressed regarding their microbiological safety. We have therefore compared the rate of intravenous catheter bacterial colonization after randomly assigning intensive care patients to transparent polyurethane (n = 21) or dry gauze (n = 20) dressings. Polyvinyl chloride catheters were inserted and maintained by the nurses. No antiseptic or antibiotic ointment was used. The two groups of patients were similar regarding risk factors for catheter colonization. Colonization rate was 48% (10/21) among patients with transparent dressings versus 10% (2/20) among patients with dry gauze dressings (p = 0.008). Colonizing bacterial species were Staphylococcus epidermidis (11 strains) and S. aureus (1 strain). No catheter-related bacteremia was observed. These data suggest that the colonization rate of intravenous catheters is increased by the use of polyurethane dressings, possibly increasing the risk of septic phlebitis and bacteremia.
虽然透明聚氨酯敷料越来越多地用于静脉导管护理,但最近人们对其微生物安全性表示担忧。因此,我们将重症监护患者随机分为透明聚氨酯敷料组(n = 21)和干纱布敷料组(n = 20),比较静脉导管细菌定植率。护士插入并维护聚氯乙烯导管。未使用抗菌或抗生素软膏。两组患者在导管定植危险因素方面相似。透明敷料组患者的定植率为48%(10/21),而干纱布敷料组患者的定植率为10%(2/20)(p = 0.008)。定植细菌种类为表皮葡萄球菌(11株)和金黄色葡萄球菌(1株)。未观察到与导管相关的菌血症。这些数据表明,使用聚氨酯敷料会增加静脉导管的定植率,可能会增加感染性静脉炎和菌血症的风险。