• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与传统纱布绷带相比,覆盖透明粘性聚氨酯绷带的静脉导管细菌定植风险增加

[Increased risk of bacterial colonization of intravenous catheters covered with transparent adhesive polyurethane bandages, compared to classical gauze bandages].

作者信息

Meylan P R

机构信息

Hôpital le Samaritain, Vevey.

出版信息

Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1987 Dec 12;117(50):2013-6.

PMID:3324330
Abstract

While transparent polyurethane dressings are increasingly used for the care of intravenous catheters, concern has recently been expressed regarding their microbiological safety. We have therefore compared the rate of intravenous catheter bacterial colonization after randomly assigning intensive care patients to transparent polyurethane (n = 21) or dry gauze (n = 20) dressings. Polyvinyl chloride catheters were inserted and maintained by the nurses. No antiseptic or antibiotic ointment was used. The two groups of patients were similar regarding risk factors for catheter colonization. Colonization rate was 48% (10/21) among patients with transparent dressings versus 10% (2/20) among patients with dry gauze dressings (p = 0.008). Colonizing bacterial species were Staphylococcus epidermidis (11 strains) and S. aureus (1 strain). No catheter-related bacteremia was observed. These data suggest that the colonization rate of intravenous catheters is increased by the use of polyurethane dressings, possibly increasing the risk of septic phlebitis and bacteremia.

摘要

虽然透明聚氨酯敷料越来越多地用于静脉导管护理,但最近人们对其微生物安全性表示担忧。因此,我们将重症监护患者随机分为透明聚氨酯敷料组(n = 21)和干纱布敷料组(n = 20),比较静脉导管细菌定植率。护士插入并维护聚氯乙烯导管。未使用抗菌或抗生素软膏。两组患者在导管定植危险因素方面相似。透明敷料组患者的定植率为48%(10/21),而干纱布敷料组患者的定植率为10%(2/20)(p = 0.008)。定植细菌种类为表皮葡萄球菌(11株)和金黄色葡萄球菌(1株)。未观察到与导管相关的菌血症。这些数据表明,使用聚氨酯敷料会增加静脉导管的定植率,可能会增加感染性静脉炎和菌血症的风险。

相似文献

1
[Increased risk of bacterial colonization of intravenous catheters covered with transparent adhesive polyurethane bandages, compared to classical gauze bandages].与传统纱布绷带相比,覆盖透明粘性聚氨酯绷带的静脉导管细菌定植风险增加
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1987 Dec 12;117(50):2013-6.
2
A prospective, randomized trial of gauze and two polyurethane dressings for site care of pulmonary artery catheters: implications for catheter management.一项关于纱布和两种聚氨酯敷料用于肺动脉导管置管部位护理的前瞻性随机试验:对导管管理的启示
Crit Care Med. 1994 Nov;22(11):1729-37.
3
A comparison of transparent polyurethane and dry gauze dressings for peripheral i.v. catheter sites: rates of phlebitis, infiltration, and dislodgment by patients.外周静脉留置针穿刺部位使用透明聚氨酯敷料与干纱布敷料的比较:患者的静脉炎、渗血和导管移位发生率
Am J Crit Care. 1997 Sep;6(5):377-81.
4
A randomized study comparing IV 3000 (transparent polyurethane dressing) to a dry gauze dressing for peripheral intravenous catheter sites.
J Intraven Nurs. 1997 Sep-Oct;20(5):253-6.
5
Evaluation of dressing regimens for prevention of infection with peripheral intravenous catheters. Gauze, a transparent polyurethane dressing, and an iodophor-transparent dressing.外周静脉导管感染预防敷料方案的评估。纱布、透明聚氨酯敷料和碘伏透明敷料。
JAMA. 1987 Nov 6;258(17):2396-403.
6
Bacterial colonization and phlebitis-associated risk with transparent polyurethane film for peripheral intravenous site dressings.外周静脉穿刺部位使用透明聚氨酯薄膜敷料的细菌定植及静脉炎相关风险
Am J Infect Control. 1988 Jun;16(3):101-6. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(88)90046-6.
7
Transparent polyurethane film as an intravenous catheter dressing. A meta-analysis of the infection risks.透明聚氨酯薄膜作为静脉导管敷料:感染风险的荟萃分析
JAMA. 1992 Apr 15;267(15):2072-6.
8
The use of gauze versus transparent dressings for peripheral intravenous catheter sites.
Nurs Clin North Am. 1995 Sep;30(3):495-506.
9
A randomized study comparing a transparent polyurethane dressing to a dry gauze dressing for peripheral intravenous catheter sites.一项比较透明聚氨酯敷料与干纱布敷料用于外周静脉导管部位的随机研究。
Infect Control. 1985 Sep;6(9):361-6. doi: 10.1017/s0195941700063323.
10
Prospective study of peripheral arterial catheter infection and comparison with concurrently sited central venous catheters.外周动脉导管感染的前瞻性研究及与同期放置的中心静脉导管的比较。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):397-402. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318161f74b.