• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较透明聚氨酯敷料与干纱布敷料用于外周静脉导管部位的随机研究。

A randomized study comparing a transparent polyurethane dressing to a dry gauze dressing for peripheral intravenous catheter sites.

作者信息

Craven D E, Lichtenberg D A, Kunches L M, McDonough A T, Gonzalez M I, Heeren T C, McCabe W R

出版信息

Infect Control. 1985 Sep;6(9):361-6. doi: 10.1017/s0195941700063323.

DOI:10.1017/s0195941700063323
PMID:3850859
Abstract

We studied rates of peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter tip and insertion site colonization after randomly assigning patients to transparent polyurethane (TP) dressings (N = 316) or dry gauze (DG) dressings (N = 421). The study was conducted during both summer and fall seasons, in a facility which lacked air conditioning. All patients had a teflon plastic catheter inserted, maintained and cultured by a member of the IV therapy team; no antibiotic or antiseptic ointments were used. Colonization rates were higher in the summer than in the fall for both catheter tips (9.0% vs 3.5%, p = 0.005) and sites (21.6% vs 7.0%, p = 0.001). During the summer season, the rate of catheter tip colonization with TP dressings was nearly twice that of DG dressings (12.4% vs 6.8%, p = 0.04). Logistic regression analysis indicated that catheter tip colonization was associated with the summer season (odds ratio = 3.0, 95% CI 1.4-6.2) and TP dressings (odds ratio = 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.2), and that site colonization was associated with both summer (odds ratio = 4.0, 95% CI 2.2-7.1) and receipt of antibiotics (odds ratio = 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.2). Coagulase-negative staphylococci were isolated from 55.5% of the colonized catheter tips and insertion sites. The data suggest that bacterial colonization of peripheral IV catheters is increased in summer, and that use of TP dressings may increase both tip colonization and cost nearly twofold.

摘要

我们将患者随机分为透明聚氨酯(TP)敷料组(N = 316)和干纱布(DG)敷料组(N = 421),研究外周静脉(IV)导管尖端和插入部位的定植率。该研究在夏季和秋季进行,研究场所没有空调。所有患者均由静脉治疗团队成员插入、维护并培养聚四氟乙烯塑料导管;未使用抗生素或抗菌软膏。导管尖端定植率夏季高于秋季(9.0% 对 3.5%,p = 0.005),插入部位定植率也是夏季高于秋季(21.6% 对 7.0%,p = 0.001)。在夏季,TP 敷料组的导管尖端定植率几乎是 DG 敷料组的两倍(12.4% 对 6.8%,p = 0.04)。逻辑回归分析表明,导管尖端定植与夏季(比值比 = 3.0,95% 置信区间 1.4 - 6.2)和 TP 敷料(比值比 = 1.8,95% 置信区间 1.1 - 3.2)有关,而部位定植与夏季(比值比 = 4.0,95% 置信区间 2.2 - 7.1)和接受抗生素治疗(比值比 = 1.9,95% 置信区间 1.1 - 3.2)有关。凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌从 55.5% 的定植导管尖端和插入部位分离出来。数据表明,夏季外周静脉导管的细菌定植增加,使用 TP 敷料可能使尖端定植和成本增加近两倍。

相似文献

1
A randomized study comparing a transparent polyurethane dressing to a dry gauze dressing for peripheral intravenous catheter sites.一项比较透明聚氨酯敷料与干纱布敷料用于外周静脉导管部位的随机研究。
Infect Control. 1985 Sep;6(9):361-6. doi: 10.1017/s0195941700063323.
2
Bacterial colonization and phlebitis-associated risk with transparent polyurethane film for peripheral intravenous site dressings.外周静脉穿刺部位使用透明聚氨酯薄膜敷料的细菌定植及静脉炎相关风险
Am J Infect Control. 1988 Jun;16(3):101-6. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(88)90046-6.
3
A prospective, randomized trial of gauze and two polyurethane dressings for site care of pulmonary artery catheters: implications for catheter management.一项关于纱布和两种聚氨酯敷料用于肺动脉导管置管部位护理的前瞻性随机试验:对导管管理的启示
Crit Care Med. 1994 Nov;22(11):1729-37.
4
Evaluation of dressing regimens for prevention of infection with peripheral intravenous catheters. Gauze, a transparent polyurethane dressing, and an iodophor-transparent dressing.外周静脉导管感染预防敷料方案的评估。纱布、透明聚氨酯敷料和碘伏透明敷料。
JAMA. 1987 Nov 6;258(17):2396-403.
5
[Increased risk of bacterial colonization of intravenous catheters covered with transparent adhesive polyurethane bandages, compared to classical gauze bandages].与传统纱布绷带相比,覆盖透明粘性聚氨酯绷带的静脉导管细菌定植风险增加
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1987 Dec 12;117(50):2013-6.
6
Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters.用于中心静脉导管的纱布、胶带和透明聚氨酯敷料。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(4):CD003827. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003827.
7
Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters.用于中心静脉导管的纱布、胶带和透明聚氨酯敷料。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9(11):CD003827. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003827.pub2.
8
Transparent polyurethane film as an intravenous catheter dressing. A meta-analysis of the infection risks.透明聚氨酯薄膜作为静脉导管敷料:感染风险的荟萃分析
JAMA. 1992 Apr 15;267(15):2072-6.
9
A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing transparent polyurethane and hydrocolloid dressings for central venous catheters.一项比较透明聚氨酯敷料与水胶体敷料用于中心静脉导管的前瞻性、随机对照试验。
Am J Infect Control. 1999 Dec;27(6):488-96. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(99)70026-x.
10
A comparison of transparent polyurethane and dry gauze dressings for peripheral i.v. catheter sites: rates of phlebitis, infiltration, and dislodgment by patients.外周静脉留置针穿刺部位使用透明聚氨酯敷料与干纱布敷料的比较:患者的静脉炎、渗血和导管移位发生率
Am J Crit Care. 1997 Sep;6(5):377-81.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative efficacy of 13 antimicrobial dressings and different securement devices in reducing catheter-related bloodstream infections: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.13种抗菌敷料及不同固定装置在减少导管相关血流感染方面的比较疗效:一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(14):e14940. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014940.
2
Gauze vs. plastic for peripheral intravenous dressings: testing a new technology.
J Gen Intern Med. 1987 Nov-Dec;2(6):411-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02596369.
3
Possible role of capillary action in pathogenesis of experimental catheter-associated dermal tunnel infections.毛细血管作用在实验性导管相关皮肤隧道感染发病机制中的可能作用。
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Jan;26(1):8-12. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.1.8-12.1988.