Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Univ. of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America.
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Feb;40:173-176. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.061. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) are at increased risk for overdose and death. Clinical practice guidelines and professional organization policy statements recommend providing naloxone to patients at risk for overdose. We sought to characterize fidelity to naloxone practice recommendations in a cohort of Emergency Department (ED) patients in whom opioid use disorder was suspected by the treating physician.
This single-center cross-sectional study evaluated electronic health records from an urban academic ED with 73,000 annual encounters in a region with a high prevalence of OUD. Patients ≥18 years old with encounters from January 1, 2018 to November 30, 2019 were included if discharged from the ED and either administered buprenorphine in the ED or referred to outpatient substance use treatment. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of included patients provided naloxone (take-home or prescription). We used random effects multivariable logistic regression (accounting for multiple patient encounters) to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for receiving naloxone.
Of 1036 eligible patient encounters, 320 resulted in naloxone provision (30.9%, 95% CI: 28.1-33.8). Naloxone provision occurred for 33.6% (95% CI 30.5-36.7) of 900 patients referred to outpatient substance use treatment without ED buprenorphine administration, 10.6% (95% CI 5.0-19.2) of 85 patients administered buprenorphine and not referred to outpatient substance use treatment, and 17.6% (95% CI 8.4-30.9) of 51 patients administered buprenorphine and referred to outpatient treatment. After controlling for age, sex, race, and prior provision of naloxone, the administration of buprenorphine was associated with a 94% lower odds (aOR = 0.06 [95% CI 0.011-0.33]) for naloxone provision compared to those only referred to outpatient treatment.
A majority of ED patients who received an intervention targeted at OUD, in an ED where take-home naloxone is freely available, did not receive either take-home naloxone or a prescription for naloxone at discharge. Patients receiving buprenorphine were less likely to receive naloxone than patients only referred to outpatient treatment. These data suggest barriers other than recognition of potential OUD and naloxone availability impact provision of naloxone and argue for a treatment "bundle" as a conceptual model for care of ED patients with suspected OUD.
患有阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的患者过量用药和死亡的风险增加。临床实践指南和专业组织政策声明建议向有用药过量风险的患者提供纳洛酮。我们旨在描述在接受治疗的医生怀疑患有 OUD 的一组急诊科(ED)患者中,对纳洛酮治疗建议的遵循情况。
这项单中心横断面研究评估了一个城市学术 ED 的电子健康记录,该 ED 每年有 73000 次就诊,该地区 OUD 患病率很高。如果患者从 ED 出院,并且在 ED 接受了丁丙诺啡治疗或被转介到门诊药物使用治疗,则将 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 11 月 30 日期间的≥18 岁的符合条件的患者纳入研究。主要结局测量指标是接受纳洛酮(自备或处方)的患者比例。我们使用随机效应多变量逻辑回归(考虑到多个患者就诊)来估计接受纳洛酮的比值比(OR)。
在 1036 例符合条件的患者就诊中,有 320 例(30.9%,95%CI:28.1-33.8)提供了纳洛酮。在没有 ED 丁丙诺啡治疗但被转介到门诊药物使用治疗的 900 例患者中,有 33.6%(95%CI 30.5-36.7),在接受丁丙诺啡治疗但未被转介到门诊药物使用治疗的 85 例患者中,有 10.6%(95%CI 5.0-19.2),在接受丁丙诺啡治疗并被转介到门诊治疗的 51 例患者中,有 17.6%(95%CI 8.4-30.9)。在控制年龄、性别、种族和先前提供纳洛酮的情况下,与仅被转介到门诊治疗的患者相比,接受丁丙诺啡治疗的患者接受纳洛酮的可能性降低了 94%(调整后的比值比[aOR]为 0.06 [95%CI 0.011-0.33])。
在一个提供免费自备纳洛酮的 ED 中,大多数接受针对 OUD 干预措施的 ED 患者在出院时既没有获得自备纳洛酮,也没有获得纳洛酮处方。与仅被转介到门诊治疗的患者相比,接受丁丙诺啡治疗的患者接受纳洛酮的可能性较低。这些数据表明,除了对潜在 OUD 的认识和纳洛酮的可及性之外,其他障碍也会影响纳洛酮的提供,并呼吁将治疗“一揽子计划”作为 ED 疑似 OUD 患者护理的概念模型。