West Virginia University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia.
West Virginia University, Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, Morgantown, West Virginia.
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Jul;25(4):470-476. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18029.
Initiation of buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD) in the emergency department (ED) is supported by the American College of Emergency Physicians and is shown to be beneficial. This practice, however, is largely underutilized.
To assess emergency clinicians' attitudes and readiness to initiate buprenorphine in the ED we conducted a cross-sectional, electronic survey of clinicians (attendings, residents, and non-physician clinicians) in a single, academic ED of a tertiary-care hospital, which serves a rural population. Our survey aimed to assess emergency clinicians' attitudes toward and readiness to initiate buprenorphine in the ED and identify clinician-perceived facilitators and barriers. Our survey took place after the initiation of the IMPACT (Initiation of Medication, Peer Access, and Connection to Treatment) project.
Our results demonstrated the level of agreement that buprenorphine prescribing is within the emergency clinician's scope of practice was inversely correlated to average years in practice (R = 0.93). X-waivered clinicians indicated feeling more prepared to administer buprenorphine in the ED R = 0.93. However, they were not more likely to report ordering buprenorphine or naloxone in the ED within the prior three months. Those who reported having a family member or close friend with substance use disorder (SUD) were not more likely to agree buprenorphine initiation is within the clinician's scope of practice ( = 0.91), nor were they more likely to obtain an X-waiver ( = 0.58) or report ordering buprenorphine or naloxone for patients in the ED within the prior three months ( = 0.65, = 0.77). Clinicians identified availability of pharmacists, inpatient/outpatient referral resources, and support staff (peer recovery support specialists and care managers) as primary facilitators to buprenorphine initiation. Inability to ensure follow-up, lack of knowledge of available resources, and insufficient education/preparedness were primary barriers to ED buprenorphine initiation. Eighty-three percent of clinicians indicated they would be interested in additional education regarding OUD treatment.
Our data suggests that newer generations of emergency clinicians may have less hesitancy initiating buprenorphine in the ED. In time, this could mean increased access to treatment for patients with OUD. Understanding clinician-perceived facilitators and barriers to buprenorphine initiation allows for better resource allocation. Clinicians would likely further benefit from additional education regarding medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), available resources, and follow-up statistics.
美国急诊医师学院支持在急诊科开始使用丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD),并已证明该方法具有益处。然而,这种做法在很大程度上并未得到充分利用。
为了评估急诊临床医生在急诊科开始使用丁丙诺啡的态度和准备情况,我们对一家三级医院的单一学术急诊科的临床医生(主治医生、住院医生和非医师临床医生)进行了横断面、电子调查,该医院为农村人口提供服务。我们的调查旨在评估急诊临床医生对在急诊科开始使用丁丙诺啡的态度和准备情况,并确定临床医生认为的促进因素和障碍。我们的调查是在启动 IMPACT(用药启动、同伴获取和治疗联系)项目之后进行的。
我们的研究结果表明,认为丁丙诺啡处方属于急诊临床医生执业范围的程度与平均执业年限呈负相关(R=0.93)。获得 X 豁免的临床医生表示,他们更有准备在急诊科管理丁丙诺啡(R=0.93)。然而,他们在过去三个月内更不可能报告在急诊科开丁丙诺啡或纳洛酮。那些报告有家庭成员或亲密朋友患有物质使用障碍(SUD)的人并不更有可能认为启动丁丙诺啡治疗属于临床医生的执业范围(R=0.91),他们也不太可能获得 X 豁免(R=0.58)或报告在过去三个月内在急诊科为患者开丁丙诺啡或纳洛酮(R=0.65,R=0.77)。临床医生将药剂师的可用性、住院/门诊转介资源和支持人员(同伴康复支持专家和护理经理)确定为启动丁丙诺啡的主要促进因素。无法确保后续治疗、缺乏可用资源的知识以及教育/准备不足是在急诊科启动丁丙诺啡的主要障碍。83%的临床医生表示他们有兴趣接受更多关于 OUD 治疗的教育。
我们的数据表明,新一代急诊临床医生可能在急诊科更愿意开始使用丁丙诺啡。随着时间的推移,这可能意味着更多患有 OUD 的患者可以获得治疗。了解临床医生对丁丙诺啡启动的看法促进因素和障碍可以更好地分配资源。临床医生可能会从更多关于阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)药物、可用资源和随访统计数据的教育中获益。