Suppr超能文献

雷米唑仑用于高风险结肠镜检查的安全性和有效性:一项随机试验。

Safety and efficacy of remimazolam in high risk colonoscopy: A randomized trial.

机构信息

Indiana University School of Medicine, 550 North University Boulevard, Suite 4100, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.

Delta Research Partners, Bastrop, LA, United States.

出版信息

Dig Liver Dis. 2021 Jan;53(1):94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.10.039. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Procedural sedation of ASA III/IV patients has increased risk. Remimazolam (an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine) has proven safe and efficient for outpatient colonoscopy sedation.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, multi-center, parallel group trial was performed, comparing remimazolam to placebo with an additional open-label arm for midazolam in procedural sedation of 79 ASA III/IV patients undergoing colonoscopy. This was the third of 3 Phase III trials for remimazolam in the procedural sedation program. The primary end point was the safety of remimazolam.

RESULTS

Of 79 patients randomized at 3 US sites, 77 underwent sedation and colonoscopy (31 received remimazolam, 16 placebo and 30 midazolam). Incidence and frequency of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable in all three treatment arms, and independent of ASA status. One TEAE leading to discontinuation and one serious TEAE were reported; both in the open label midazolam arm. The efficacy endpoint was achieved for remimazolam, placebo, and midazolam in 87.1%, 0%, and 13.3% of patients (p<0.00001 for remimazolam versus placebo and versus midazolam, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Remimazolam is safe and efficient in procedural sedation of high risk ASA patients undergoing colonoscopy, showing a safety profile comparable to that in low risk ASA.

摘要

背景

ASA III/IV 级患者的程序性镇静风险增加。雷米唑仑(一种超短效苯二氮䓬类药物)已被证明在门诊结肠镜检查镇静中安全有效。

方法

进行了一项双盲、随机、多中心、平行组试验,比较雷米唑仑与安慰剂,以及在 79 例接受结肠镜检查的 ASA III/IV 级患者的程序性镇静中米达唑仑的开放性标签臂,比较雷米唑仑与安慰剂。这是雷米唑仑程序性镇静方案的 3 项 III 期试验中的第 3 项。主要终点是雷米唑仑的安全性。

结果

在 3 个美国地点随机分配的 79 例患者中,77 例接受了镇静和结肠镜检查(31 例接受雷米唑仑,16 例接受安慰剂,30 例接受咪达唑仑)。所有 3 个治疗组的治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)的发生率和频率相似,与 ASA 状态无关。报告了 1 例导致停药的治疗中出现的不良事件和 1 例严重的治疗中出现的不良事件;均发生在开放性标签咪达唑仑组。雷米唑仑、安慰剂和咪达唑仑在 87.1%、0%和 13.3%的患者中达到了疗效终点(雷米唑仑与安慰剂相比和与咪达唑仑相比,p<0.00001)。

结论

雷米唑仑在接受结肠镜检查的高风险 ASA 患者的程序性镇静中是安全有效的,其安全性与低风险 ASA 患者相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验