• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字乳腺断层合成与 2D 乳腺摄影联合用于乳腺异常特征化的诊断准确性。

Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis in combination with 2D mammography for the characterisation of mammographic abnormalities.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Imaging, University Malaya Research Imaging Centre, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 26;10(1):20628. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77456-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-77456-6
PMID:33244075
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7691352/
Abstract

This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis in combination with full field digital mammography (DBT + FFDM) in the charaterisation of Breast Imaging-reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3, 4 and 5 lesions. Retrospective cross-sectional study of 390 patients with BI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 mammography with available histopathology examination results were recruited from in a single center of a multi-ethnic Asian population. 2 readers independently reported the FFDM and DBT images and classified lesions detected (mass, calcifications, asymmetric density and architectural distortion) based on American College of Radiology-BI-RADS lexicon. Of the 390 patients recruited, 182 malignancies were reported. Positive predictive value (PPV) of cancer was 46.7%. The PPV in BI-RADS 4a, 4b, 4c and 5 were 6.0%, 38.3%, 68.9%, and 93.1%, respectively. Among all the cancers, 76% presented as masses, 4% as calcifications and 20% as asymmetry. An additional of 4% of cancers were detected on ultrasound. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of mass lesions detected on DBT + FFDM were 93.8%, 85.1%, 88.8% and 91.5%, respectively. The PPV for calcification is 61.6% and asymmetry is 60.7%. 81.6% of cancer detected were invasive and 13.3% were in-situ type. Our study showed that DBT is proven to be an effective tool in the diagnosis and characterization of breast lesions and supports the current body of literature that states that integrating DBT to FFDM allows good characterization of breast lesions and accurate diagnosis of cancer.

摘要

本研究旨在评估数字乳腺断层合成摄影术(DBT)联合全数字化乳腺摄影术(FFDM)在乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分类 3、4 和 5 病变中的诊断准确性。这项回顾性的病例对照研究纳入了 390 名来自单一中心的多民族亚洲人群的 BI-RADS 3、4 和 5 级乳腺摄影患者,这些患者均有可获得的组织病理学检查结果。2 位阅片者分别独立对 FFDM 和 DBT 图像进行了报告,并根据美国放射学院-BI-RADS 词汇对检测到的病变(肿块、钙化、不对称密度和结构扭曲)进行了分类。在纳入的 390 名患者中,报告了 182 例恶性肿瘤。癌症的阳性预测值(PPV)为 46.7%。BI-RADS 4a、4b、4c 和 5 的 PPV 分别为 6.0%、38.3%、68.9%和 93.1%。在所有癌症中,76%表现为肿块,4%为钙化,20%为不对称。在超声检查中还额外检出了 4%的癌症。DBT+FFDM 检测到的肿块病变的敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 93.8%、85.1%、88.8%和 91.5%。钙化的 PPV 为 61.6%,不对称的 PPV 为 60.7%。81.6%的检出癌症为浸润性癌,13.3%为原位癌。本研究表明,DBT 被证明是一种有效的诊断和评估乳腺病变的工具,支持了目前的文献,即整合 DBT 到 FFDM 可以很好地评估乳腺病变,并准确诊断癌症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333f/7691352/0fd3684fe057/41598_2020_77456_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333f/7691352/2ddf464bdfd3/41598_2020_77456_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333f/7691352/c4f61f82e807/41598_2020_77456_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333f/7691352/919d98c76b49/41598_2020_77456_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333f/7691352/8ea5e8f39360/41598_2020_77456_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333f/7691352/0fd3684fe057/41598_2020_77456_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333f/7691352/2ddf464bdfd3/41598_2020_77456_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333f/7691352/c4f61f82e807/41598_2020_77456_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333f/7691352/919d98c76b49/41598_2020_77456_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333f/7691352/8ea5e8f39360/41598_2020_77456_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333f/7691352/0fd3684fe057/41598_2020_77456_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis in combination with 2D mammography for the characterisation of mammographic abnormalities.数字乳腺断层合成与 2D 乳腺摄影联合用于乳腺异常特征化的诊断准确性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 26;10(1):20628. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77456-6.
2
Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.数字乳腺断层合成摄影与数字乳腺钼靶摄影的对比:病灶显示度及 BI-RADS 评估类别的评估。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Dec;166(3):765-773. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4458-3. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
3
Estimation of percentage breast tissue density: comparison between digital mammography (2D full field digital mammography) and digital breast tomosynthesis according to different BI-RADS categories.乳腺组织密度百分比的估计:数字乳腺钼靶摄影(二维全视野数字化乳腺钼靶摄影)与数字乳腺断层合成技术在不同 BI-RADS 分类中的比较。
Br J Radiol. 2013 Nov;86(1031):20130255. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130255. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
4
Diagnostic Efficacy of Synthesized 2D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Multi-ethnic Malaysian Population.马来西亚多民族人群中合成 2D 数字乳腺断层合成的诊断效能。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 6;9(1):1459. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37451-4.
5
Frequency and Outcomes of BI-RADS Category 3 Assessments in Patients With a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.有乳腺癌个人病史患者的 BI-RADS 类别 3 评估的频率和结果:全视野数字化乳腺摄影与数字乳腺断层合成术。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Sep;221(3):313-322. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29067. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
6
Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.数字乳腺断层合成术与全视野数字乳腺摄影术:使用标本对病变测量和特征描述准确性的比较
Acta Radiol. 2014 Jul;55(6):661-7. doi: 10.1177/0284185113503636. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
7
Clinical implementation of synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis in a routine clinical practice.数字乳腺断层合成摄影在常规临床实践中的临床应用。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Nov;166(2):501-509. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4431-1. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
8
Detection and characterization of breast lesions in a selective diagnostic population: diagnostic accuracy study for comparison between one-view digital breast tomosynthesis and two-view full-field digital mammography.选择性诊断人群中乳腺病变的检测与特征分析:单视图数字乳腺断层合成与双视图全视野数字乳腺摄影对比的诊断准确性研究
Br J Radiol. 2016 Jun;89(1062):20150743. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150743. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
9
Breast tomosynthesis for the clarification of mammographic BI-RADS 3 lesions can decrease follow-up examinations and enables immediate cancer diagnosis.乳腺断层合成技术用于明确乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)3类病变,可减少随访检查并实现癌症的即时诊断。
Acta Radiol. 2018 Oct;59(10):1176-1183. doi: 10.1177/0284185118756458. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
10
Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.数字乳腺断层合成摄影与二维数字乳腺钼钯成像中钙化的检测与分类:比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):320-4. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4656.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of ultrasonography and mammography in detecting features of breast cancer.超声检查和乳房X线摄影术在检测乳腺癌特征方面的效能
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Jan;14(1):341-347. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1225_24. Epub 2025 Jan 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic Efficacy of Synthesized 2D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Multi-ethnic Malaysian Population.马来西亚多民族人群中合成 2D 数字乳腺断层合成的诊断效能。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 6;9(1):1459. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37451-4.
2
Pathologic Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Digital 2D Versus Tomosynthesis Mammography.数字化二维乳腺摄影与断层合成乳腺摄影中结构扭曲的病理结果
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Nov;209(5):1162-1167. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.17979. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
3
Differences in mammographic density between Asian and Caucasian populations: a comparative analysis.
亚洲人群与白种人群乳腺X线密度的差异:一项对比分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jan;161(2):353-362. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-4054-y. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
4
Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study.与单纯二维钼靶(2D 钼靶)相比,采用获得性或合成二维钼靶(2D 钼靶)的断层合成乳腺 X 线摄影术(3D 乳腺 X 线摄影术)进行乳腺癌筛查(STORM-2):一项基于人群的前瞻性研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1105-1113. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30101-2. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
5
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a review of the evidence for use as a screening tool.数字乳腺断层合成(DBT):用作筛查工具的证据综述。
Clin Radiol. 2016 Feb;71(2):141-50. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.11.008. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
6
Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Depicting Breast Cancer Subgroups in a UK Retrospective Reading Study (TOMMY Trial).数字乳腺断层合成在英国回顾性阅读研究(TOMMY 试验)中对乳腺癌亚组的描绘准确性。
Radiology. 2015 Dec;277(3):697-706. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015142566. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
Opportunistic mammography screening provides effective detection rates in a limited resource healthcare system.机会性乳腺钼靶筛查在资源有限的医疗系统中能提供有效的检出率。
BMC Cancer. 2015 May 15;15:405. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1419-2.
8
Ethnic differences in mammographic densities: an Asian cross-sectional study.乳房X线密度的种族差异:一项亚洲横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 6;10(2):e0117568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117568. eCollection 2015.
9
Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis and digital mammography-reply.乳腺断层合成与数字乳腺摄影用于乳腺癌筛查——回复
JAMA. 2014;312(16):1695-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.11123.
10
Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience.数字乳腺断层合成筛查中对隐匿性结构扭曲的检测:初步临床经验。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jul;203(1):216-22. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11047.