Grischke E M, Rüttgers H
University Women's Hospital, Heidelberg, FRG.
Urol Int. 1987;42(5):338-41. doi: 10.1159/000281988.
In an open comparative study 400 patients with urinary tract infections were randomly allocated to two treatment groups. In 202 patients an immune stimulation against uropathogenic bacteria was produced with a new preparation, SolcoUrovac, and only in exceptional cases with pronounced symptomatology was antibiotic therapy given, while in the control group (n = 198) all patients were treated with nitrofurantoin or with another appropriate antibiotic, according to the antibiogram. In the subsequent 12-month observation period 28 infections occurred in 23 patients of the immune-stimulated group and 84 in 47 patients of the control group. This difference is statistically significant (p less than or equal to 0.001). The preventive effect of the SolcoUrovac therapy was particularly impressive in patients with recurrent urinary tract infections. Thirty-two patients from each group with similar case histories, as matched pairs, were evaluated separately. The relapse rate in the 12-month observation period amounted to 2 re-infections in the group treated with immunotherapy and to 29 in the control group. All side-effects were recorded. No adverse effects were observed in pregnant women or in their offspring.
在一项开放性对比研究中,400例尿路感染患者被随机分配到两个治疗组。202例患者使用一种新制剂SolcoUrovac对尿路致病菌进行免疫刺激,仅在症状明显的特殊情况下给予抗生素治疗,而在对照组(n = 198)中,所有患者根据药敏试验结果使用呋喃妥因或其他合适的抗生素进行治疗。在随后的12个月观察期内,免疫刺激组的23例患者发生了28次感染,而对照组的47例患者发生了84次感染。这种差异具有统计学意义(p≤0.001)。SolcoUrovac疗法对复发性尿路感染患者的预防效果尤为显著。将每组中32例病史相似的患者作为配对进行单独评估。在12个月的观察期内,免疫治疗组的复发率为2次再次感染,而对照组为29次。记录了所有副作用。未在孕妇及其后代中观察到不良反应。