School of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 7343, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand.
Capital and Coast District Health Board, Private Bag 7902, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand.
CNS Drugs. 2020 Dec;34(12):1217-1228. doi: 10.1007/s40263-020-00773-x. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
Insomnia is associated with significant comorbidity, disability and impact on quality of life and, despite advances in pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, remains a significant burden to society. Cannabinoids are gaining acceptance for use as medicines in the treatment of insomnia disorder.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of cannabinoids in the treatment of insomnia disorder.
We performed a systematic review of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Complete databases from inception to 5 December 2019, and again prior to data abstraction, for studies of cannabis-based products for the treatment of insomnia disorder in adults. Inclusion criteria were (1) clinical studies, (2) participants aged ≥ 18 years, (3) insomnia disorder either formally diagnosed against contemporaneous diagnostic criteria or quantified with validated instruments and (4) compared cannabis-based products with the standard of care, placebo or a sedative. No language restrictions were imposed. Non-primary research, animal studies and studies of cannabis-induced insomnia were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for non-randomized trials. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I statistic.
A total of five studies (two RCTs and three non-randomised studies) with 219 study participants were included, of which three could be combined. The three non-randomised studies contributed data on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Questionnaire score, showing a favourable effect of cannabinoids at ≤ 4 weeks of follow-up (mean difference - 1.89 [95% confidence interval {CI} - 2.68 to - 1.10]; n = 176) and at 8 weeks of follow-up (mean difference - 2.41 [95% CI - 3.36 to - 1.46]; n = 166). One double-blind crossover RCT (n = 32) reported that, compared with amitriptyline, nabilone-a synthetic analogue to tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-improved Insomnia Severity Index scores after 2 weeks of treatment (adjusted difference - 3.25 [95% CI - 5.26 to - 1.24]) and resulted in a more restful sleep as a sub-measure of the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) (difference 0.48 [95% CI 0.01-0.95]) but with no effect on overall sleep quality as measured by the LSEQ. In a single ascending-dose RCT (n = 9), THC reduced sleep-onset latency compared with placebo at 10 mg, 20 mg and 30 mg doses (mean difference - 43.00 min [95% CI - 82.76 to - 3.24], - 62.00 [95% CI - 103.60 to - 20.40] and - 54.00 [95% CI - 103.93 to - 4.07], respectively). All the included studies were assessed as poor quality, mainly due to small sample sizes, short treatment periods, uncertain clinical significance and high risk of bias.
Few studies have examined the efficacy of cannabinoids in the treatment of insomnia disorder. Despite some possible signals for efficacy, the heterogeneity of participants, interventions, efficacy outcomes and results, and the high risk of bias across included trials, do not reliably inform evidence-based practice. This review highlights shortcomings in the existing literature, including lack of diagnostic clarity, poorly defined participant groups, non-standardised interventions and studies of inappropriate design, duration and power to detect clinically meaningful outcomes. Further research in the form of high-quality RCTs are required before drawing any conclusions about the efficacy of cannabinoids in the treatment of insomnia disorder.
PROSPERO registration number, CRD42020161043.
失眠与显著的合并症、残疾以及对生活质量的影响有关,尽管在药物治疗和心理治疗方面取得了进展,但失眠仍然给社会带来了巨大的负担。大麻素在治疗失眠症方面的应用作为药物越来越被接受。
我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估大麻素治疗失眠症的疗效。
我们对 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、MEDLINE 和 Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Complete 数据库进行了系统回顾,从成立到 2019 年 12 月 5 日进行了一次检索,在进行数据提取之前又进行了一次检索,检索的内容是关于大麻素类产品治疗成人失眠症的研究。纳入标准为:(1)临床研究;(2)参与者年龄≥18 岁;(3)失眠症要么根据同期诊断标准正式诊断,要么通过经过验证的工具进行量化;(4)将大麻素类产品与标准治疗、安慰剂或镇静剂进行比较。没有语言限制。非原始研究、动物研究和大麻引起的失眠研究被排除在外。使用随机对照试验(RCT)的 RoB 2 工具和非随机干预研究的风险偏倚(ROBINS-I)工具评估风险偏倚。使用 I 统计量评估异质性。
共纳入了五项研究(两项 RCT 和三项非随机研究),涉及 219 名研究参与者,其中三项可以合并。三项非随机研究提供了匹兹堡睡眠质量指数问卷评分的数据,表明大麻素在≤4 周的随访期(平均差异-1.89 [95%置信区间 {CI} -2.68 至-1.10];n=176)和 8 周随访期(平均差异-2.41 [95% CI -3.36 至-1.46];n=166)均有良好的效果。一项双盲交叉 RCT(n=32)报告称,与阿米替林相比,合成四氢大麻酚(THC)类似物纳布酮改善了失眠严重程度指数评分,治疗 2 周后(调整后的差异-3.25 [95% CI -5.26 至-1.24]),并改善了利兹睡眠评估问卷(LSEQ)的睡眠恢复作为子测量(差异 0.48 [95% CI 0.01-0.95]),但对整体睡眠质量无影响,以 LSEQ 衡量。在一项单剂量递增 RCT 中(n=9),与安慰剂相比,THC 可降低睡眠潜伏期,在 10mg、20mg 和 30mg 剂量时(平均差异-43.00 分钟 [95% CI -82.76 至-3.24]、-62.00 [95% CI -103.60 至-20.40]和-54.00 [95% CI -103.93 至-4.07])。所有纳入的研究都被评估为质量较差,主要原因是样本量小、治疗期短、临床意义不确定和高偏倚风险。
很少有研究检查大麻素治疗失眠症的疗效。尽管有一些可能有效的信号,但由于参与者、干预措施、疗效结果和结果的异质性,以及纳入试验的高偏倚风险,无法可靠地为循证实践提供信息。本综述强调了现有文献中的一些不足之处,包括缺乏诊断清晰度、定义不明确的参与者群体、非标准化的干预措施以及设计、持续时间和检测临床有意义结果的能力不合适的研究。在得出关于大麻素治疗失眠症疗效的任何结论之前,需要进行高质量的 RCT 研究。
PROSPERO 注册号,CRD42020161043。