Suppr超能文献

乌灵胶囊治疗失眠症的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和Meta分析

Efficacy and safety of Wuling capsule for insomnia disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Zhou Hufang, Zhao Ying, Peng Wenhua, Han Wenbo, Wang Dayang, Wang Zichen, Ren Xiaoxia, Pan Guozhong, Lin Qian, Wang Xian

机构信息

Cardiovascular Diseases Center, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100007, China.

Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100078, China.

出版信息

Sleep Med. 2022 May;93:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2022.03.014. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Wuling capsule has been used in treatment of insomnia disorder in China for decades, but the reported treatment efficacy of different studies was not consistent. This study intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Wuling capsule for insomnia disorder, so as to provide evidence for clinical application.

METHODS

Eight databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Ovid, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP information database, Chinese Biomedical Database and Wanfang) were searched from inception to September 14, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Wuling capsule with controls in adults with insomnia disorder were eligible. The primary outcome was sleep quality assessed by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and the secondary outcomes were severity of insomnia disorder measured by Sleep Dysfunction Rating Scale (SDRS) and adverse events. This study was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.1.0.

RESULTS

Nineteen RCTs with a total of 1850 participants were included. In terms of sleep quality assessed by PSQI, Wuling capsule significantly lowered PSQI score (MD: -1.92, 95% CI: [-2.34, -1.50], P < 0.00001, I = 95%) compared to controls, and the effect of Wuling capsule was significantly better than control no matter when Wuling capsule as monotherapy (MD: -1.71, 95% CI: [-2.33, -1.09], P < 0.00001, I = 97%) or as adjunctive therapy (MD: -2.10, 95% CI: [-2.66, -1.55], P < 0.00001, I = 90%). Wuling capsule was more effective for the treatment duration lasted 8 weeks (MD: -2.57, 95% CI: [-3.52, -1.62], P < 0.00001, I = 93%) than 4 weeks (MD: -1.68, 95% CI: [-2.13, -1.22], P < 0.00001, I = 95%). In terms of severity of insomnia disorder measured by SDRS, Wuling capsule significantly reduced SDRS score (MD: -4.21, 95% CI: [-4.95, -3.46], P < 0.00001, I = 0%) compared to benzodiazepines. Wuling capsule significantly reduced adverse events compared to controls (RR: 0.47, 95% CI: [0.34, 0.65], P < 0.00001, I = 43%).

CONCLUSION

Wuling capsule can safely and effectively improve sleep quality in patients with insomnia disorder. However, these findings require careful recommendation due to the high heterogeneity and high risk of bias in the included trials. Clinical trials with higher quality designs are needed.

摘要

目的

在中国,乌灵胶囊已用于治疗失眠症数十年,但不同研究报告的治疗效果并不一致。本研究旨在评估乌灵胶囊治疗失眠症的疗效和安全性,为临床应用提供依据。

方法

检索了8个数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、Ovid、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网、维普资讯数据库、中国生物医学数据库和万方),检索时间从建库至2021年9月14日。纳入比较乌灵胶囊与对照组治疗成人失眠症的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局是采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评估的睡眠质量,次要结局是采用睡眠功能障碍评定量表(SDRS)测量的失眠症严重程度和不良事件。本研究按照Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册第5.1.0版进行。

结果

纳入19项RCT,共1850名参与者。就PSQI评估的睡眠质量而言,与对照组相比,乌灵胶囊显著降低了PSQI评分(MD:-1.92,95%CI:[-2.34,-1.50],P<0.00001,I²=95%),无论乌灵胶囊作为单一疗法(MD:-1.71,95%CI:[-2.33,-1.09],P<0.00001,I²=97%)还是辅助疗法(MD:-2.10,95%CI:[-2.66,-1.55],P<0.00001,I²=90%),乌灵胶囊的效果均显著优于对照组。乌灵胶囊治疗8周(MD:-2.57,95%CI:[-3.52,-1.62],P<0.00001,I²=93%)比治疗4周(MD:-1.68,95%CI:[-2.13,-1.22],P<0.00001,I²=95%)更有效。就SDRS测量的失眠症严重程度而言,与苯二氮䓬类药物相比,乌灵胶囊显著降低了SDRS评分(MD:-4.21,95%CI:[-4.95,-3.46],P<0.00001,I²=0%)。与对照组相比,乌灵胶囊显著减少了不良事件(RR:0.47,95%CI:[0.34,0.65],P<0.00001,I²=43%)。

结论

乌灵胶囊可安全有效地改善失眠症患者的睡眠质量。然而,由于纳入试验的异质性高和偏倚风险高,这些结果需要谨慎推荐。需要更高质量设计的临床试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验