• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

监测技术对慢性乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿进展的影响:一项比较生物电阻抗光谱法与周径测量法的荟萃分析

The impact of monitoring techniques on progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema: a meta-analysis comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy versus circumferential measurements.

作者信息

Shah Chirag, Zambelli-Weiner April, Delgado Nicole, Sier Ashley, Bauserman Robert, Nelms Jerrod

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

TTi Health Research and Economics, Westminster, MD, USA.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Feb;185(3):709-740. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05988-6. Epub 2020 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-020-05988-6
PMID:33245458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7921068/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a potentially serious complication following treatment. Monitoring for progression to BCRL may allow for earlier detection and intervention, reducing the rate of progression to chronic BCRL. Therefore, the purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the impact of monitoring techniques on the incidence of chronic BCRL among patients monitored by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) and circumference as compared to background rates.

METHODS

Eligible peer-reviewed studies from PubMed, CINHAL, or Google Scholar that were published in English from 2013 onward and conducted in North America, Europe, or Oceania. Incidence rates abstracted from studies were classified by BCRL monitoring method: background (no standardized BIS or circumference assessments), BIS or circumference. A random-effects model was used to calculate a pooled annualized estimate of BCRL incidence while accounting for clinical and methodological heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses examined differences in duration of follow-up as well as breast and axillary surgery.

RESULTS

50 studies were included, representing over 67,000 women. The annualized incidence of BCRL was 4.9% (95% CI: 4.3-5.5) for background studies (n = 35), 1.5% (95% CI: 0.6-2.4) for BIS-monitored studies (n = 7), and 7.7% (95% CI: 5.6-9.8) for circumference-monitored studies (n = 11). The cumulative BCRL incidence rate in BIS-monitored patients was 3.1% as compared to 12.9% with background monitoring (69% reduction) and 17.0% with circumference-monitored patients (81% reduction).

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence suggests that monitoring with BIS allowing for early intervention significantly reduces the relative risk of chronic BCRL with a 69% and 81% reduction compared to background and circumference, respectively. Circumference monitoring did not appear to provide a benefit with respect to chronic BCRL incidence. Based on these results, BIS should be considered for BCRL screening in order to detect subclinical BCRL and reduce rates of chronic BCRL, particularly in high-risk patients.

摘要

背景

慢性乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)是治疗后一种潜在的严重并发症。监测BCRL的进展情况可能有助于早期发现和干预,从而降低进展为慢性BCRL的发生率。因此,本荟萃分析的目的是评估与背景发生率相比,生物电阻抗光谱法(BIS)和周长监测技术对慢性BCRL发生率的影响。

方法

从PubMed、CINHAL或谷歌学术中筛选符合条件的同行评审研究,这些研究于2013年以后以英文发表,且在北美、欧洲或大洋洲进行。从研究中提取的发病率按BCRL监测方法分类:背景(无标准化的BIS或周长评估)、BIS或周长。采用随机效应模型计算BCRL发病率的合并年化估计值,同时考虑临床和方法学异质性。亚组分析考察了随访时间以及乳房和腋窝手术的差异。

结果

纳入50项研究,涉及超过67000名女性。背景研究(n = 35)中BCRL的年化发病率为4.9%(95%CI:4.3 - 5.5),BIS监测研究(n = 7)中为1.5%(95%CI:0.6 - 2.4),周长监测研究(n = 11)中为7.7%(95%CI:5.6 - 9.8)。BIS监测患者的BCRL累积发病率为3.1%,而背景监测为12.9%(降低69%),周长监测患者为17.0%(降低81%)。

结论

有证据表明,采用BIS进行监测并能早期干预可显著降低慢性BCRL的相对风险,与背景和周长监测相比,分别降低了69%和81%。周长监测在慢性BCRL发病率方面似乎未显示出益处。基于这些结果,应考虑将BIS用于BCRL筛查,以检测亚临床BCRL并降低慢性BCRL的发生率,尤其是在高危患者中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84aa/7921068/f078b4354413/10549_2020_5988_Fig3a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84aa/7921068/ca9d3dc090c8/10549_2020_5988_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84aa/7921068/4f1ab4825213/10549_2020_5988_Fig2a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84aa/7921068/f078b4354413/10549_2020_5988_Fig3a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84aa/7921068/ca9d3dc090c8/10549_2020_5988_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84aa/7921068/4f1ab4825213/10549_2020_5988_Fig2a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84aa/7921068/f078b4354413/10549_2020_5988_Fig3a_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of monitoring techniques on progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema: a meta-analysis comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy versus circumferential measurements.监测技术对慢性乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿进展的影响:一项比较生物电阻抗光谱法与周径测量法的荟萃分析
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Feb;185(3):709-740. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05988-6. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
2
Reducing Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) Through Prospective Surveillance Monitoring Using Bioimpedance Spectroscopy (BIS) and Patient Directed Self-Interventions.通过生物阻抗谱(BIS)和患者指导的自我干预进行前瞻性监测,降低乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(10):2948-2952. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6601-8. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
3
Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) and Bioimpedance Spectroscopy: Long-Term Follow-Up, Surveillance Recommendations, and Multidisciplinary Risk Factors.乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)和生物阻抗光谱学:长期随访、监测建议和多学科危险因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(10):6258-6265. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13956-9. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
4
Bioimpedance spectroscopy for breast cancer-related lymphedema assessment: clinical practice guidelines.生物阻抗光谱法评估乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿:临床实践指南。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Feb;198(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06850-7. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
5
Utilization of bioimpedance spectroscopy in the prevention of chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema.生物电阻抗光谱法在预防慢性乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿中的应用。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Dec;166(3):809-815. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4451-x. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
6
Is bioimpedance spectroscopy a useful tool for objectively assessing lymphovenous bypass surgical outcomes in breast cancer-related lymphedema?生物电阻抗光谱法是否可作为一种客观评估乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿淋巴静脉旁路手术后结果的有用工具?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Feb;186(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-06059-6. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
7
Defining breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) prevalence and risk factors: A pragmatic approach to lymphedema surveillance.定义乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)的患病率和风险因素:淋巴水肿监测的实用方法。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2024 Feb 28;53(2):80-89. doi: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2023264.
8
A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis.一项评估生物电阻抗光谱法与胶带测量法预防乳腺癌治疗后淋巴水肿的随机试验:中期分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(10):3250-3259. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07344-5. Epub 2019 May 3.
9
A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention.生物阻抗光谱或卷尺触发压缩干预在慢性乳腺癌淋巴水肿预防中的比较。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2022 Dec;20(6):618-628. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2021.0084. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
10
The incidence and risk factors of related lymphedema for breast cancer survivors post-operation: a 2-year follow-up prospective cohort study.术后乳腺癌幸存者相关淋巴水肿的发生率和风险因素:一项为期 2 年的随访前瞻性队列研究。
Breast Cancer. 2018 May;25(3):309-314. doi: 10.1007/s12282-018-0830-3. Epub 2018 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence of lymphedema related to various cancers.各种癌症相关淋巴水肿的发生率。
Med Oncol. 2024 Sep 17;41(10):245. doi: 10.1007/s12032-024-02441-2.
2
Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) and Bioimpedance Spectroscopy: Long-Term Follow-Up, Surveillance Recommendations, and Multidisciplinary Risk Factors.乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)和生物阻抗光谱学:长期随访、监测建议和多学科危险因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(10):6258-6265. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13956-9. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
3
Plasma Cytokines/Chemokines as Predictive Biomarkers for Lymphedema in Breast Cancer Patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Bioimpedance spectroscopy in the detection of breast cancer-related lymphedema: An ounce of prevention.生物电阻抗光谱法在乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿检测中的应用:预防为主
Breast J. 2019 Nov;25(6):1323-1325. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13618. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
2
A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis.一项评估生物电阻抗光谱法与胶带测量法预防乳腺癌治疗后淋巴水肿的随机试验:中期分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(10):3250-3259. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07344-5. Epub 2019 May 3.
3
Analysis of Postoperative Complications After 303 Sentinel Lymph Node Identification Procedures Using the SentiMag® Method in Breast Cancer Patients.
血浆细胞因子/趋化因子作为乳腺癌患者淋巴水肿的预测生物标志物
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 21;15(3):676. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030676.
4
Prospective Surveillance with Compression for Subclinical Lymphedema: Symptoms, Skin, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes.无症状性淋巴水肿的预防性加压治疗监测:症状、皮肤和生活质量结局。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2023 Jun;21(3):304-313. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2022.0020. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
5
Bioelectrical impedance analysis for early screening of upper limb subclinical lymphedema: A case-control study.生物电阻抗分析在早期筛查上肢亚临床淋巴水肿中的应用:一项病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 19;17(9):e0274570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274570. eCollection 2022.
6
A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention.生物阻抗光谱或卷尺触发压缩干预在慢性乳腺癌淋巴水肿预防中的比较。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2022 Dec;20(6):618-628. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2021.0084. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
7
Novel Wireless Bioimpedance Device for Segmental Lymphedema Analysis Post Dual-Site Free Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer: A Prospective Cohort Study.新型无线生物阻抗设备在双部位游离血管化淋巴结移植术后节段性淋巴水肿分析中的应用:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Dec 8;21(24):8187. doi: 10.3390/s21248187.
8
Letter to the editor re: Shah et al.: "The impact of monitoring techniques on progression to chronic breast cancer‑related lymphedema: a meta‑analysis comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy versus circumferential measurements".致编辑的信:关于沙阿等人的研究:“监测技术对慢性乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿进展的影响:生物电阻抗光谱法与周径测量法比较的荟萃分析”
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Feb;186(1):269-270. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-06081-8. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
分析使用 SentiMag® 方法在乳腺癌患者中进行的 303 例前哨淋巴结识别手术后的并发症。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Apr 29;25:3154-3160. doi: 10.12659/MSM.912758.
4
Progressive resistance training to prevent arm lymphedema in the first year after breast cancer surgery: Results of a randomized controlled trial.渐进式抗阻训练预防乳腺癌术后第一年手臂淋巴水肿:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Cancer. 2019 May 15;125(10):1683-1692. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31962. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
5
Survivorship care visits in a high-risk population of breast cancer survivors.高危乳腺癌幸存者的生存护理访视。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Feb;173(3):701-708. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5028-z. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
6
A Prospective Study of L-Dex Values in Breast Cancer Patients Pretreatment and Through 12 Months Postoperatively.一项关于乳腺癌患者术前及术后12个月L-Dex值的前瞻性研究。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2018 Oct;16(5):435-441. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2017.0070. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
7
Reducing Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) Through Prospective Surveillance Monitoring Using Bioimpedance Spectroscopy (BIS) and Patient Directed Self-Interventions.通过生物阻抗谱(BIS)和患者指导的自我干预进行前瞻性监测,降低乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(10):2948-2952. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6601-8. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
8
Lymphedema symptoms and limb measurement changes in breast cancer survivors treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and axillary dissection: results of American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z1071 (Alliance) substudy.新辅助化疗和腋窝清扫术后乳腺癌幸存者的淋巴水肿症状和肢体测量变化:美国外科医师学院肿瘤学组(ACOSOG)Z1071(联盟)子研究结果。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Feb;27(2):495-503. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4334-7. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
9
Arm morbidity of axillary dissection with sentinel node biopsy versus delayed axillary dissection.前哨淋巴结活检与延迟腋窝清扫术相比,腋窝清扫术的上肢并发症
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Sep;88(9):917-921. doi: 10.1111/ans.14382. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
10
Function, Shoulder Motion, Pain, and Lymphedema in Breast Cancer With and Without Axillary Web Syndrome: An 18-Month Follow-Up.功能、肩部运动、疼痛和乳腺癌伴或不伴腋网综合征的淋巴水肿:18 个月随访。
Phys Ther. 2018 Jun 1;98(6):518-527. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy010.