Suppr超能文献

根据美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)2015年的蒸汽协议草案评估六种市售的封闭系统药物转移装置。

Evaluating Six Commercially Available Closed-System Drug-Transfer Devices Against NIOSH's 2015 Draft Vapor Protocol.

作者信息

Halloush Shiraz, Reveles Ivan A, Koeller Jim

机构信息

The University of Texas at Austin, USA.

UT Health San Antonio, USA.

出版信息

Hosp Pharm. 2020 Dec;55(6):391-399. doi: 10.1177/0018578719848730. Epub 2019 Jun 6.

Abstract

In 2015, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) published a draft vapor containment protocol to quantitatively evaluate combined liquid, aerosol, and vapor containment performance of commercially available closed-system drug-transfer devices (CSTDs) that claim to be effective for gas/vapor containment within a controlled test environment. Until the release of this proposed protocol, no standard method for evaluating airtightness of CSTDs existed. The aim of this study was to evaluate six commercially available CSTDs utilizing NIOSH draft protocol methodology to evaluate vapor containment under a robust vapor challenge. In this study, six commercially available CSTDs were tested utilizing draft NIOSH vapor containment protocol methodology to simulate drug compounding and administration using 70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) as the challenge agent. All device manipulations were carried out in an enclosed test chamber. A Miran sapphIRe gas analyzer was used to detect IPA vapor levels that escaped the device. Study test included the two tasks designated by the NIOSH protocol, with additional steps added to the evaluation. Tasks were repeated 10 times for each device. Only three of the six tested CSTDs (Equashield®, HALO®, and PhaSealTM) had an average IPA vapor release below the quantifiable performance threshold (1.0 ppm) for all tasks performed. This value was selected by NIOSH to represent the performance threshold for successful containment. The remaining three CSTDs had vapor release above 1 ppm at various times during the IPA manipulation process. Equashield®, HALO®, and PhaSealTM devices tested met the 2015 NIOSH protocol quantifiable performance threshold, functioning as a truly closed system. Quantifiable effective data may be useful in product selection.

摘要

2015年,美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)发布了一份蒸汽防护协议草案,以定量评估市售密闭系统药物转移装置(CSTD)的液体、气溶胶和蒸汽综合防护性能,这些装置声称在受控测试环境中对气体/蒸汽具有防护效果。在该拟议协议发布之前,不存在评估CSTD气密性的标准方法。本研究的目的是利用NIOSH协议草案方法评估六种市售CSTD在强大的蒸汽挑战下的蒸汽防护性能。在本研究中,使用NIOSH蒸汽防护协议草案方法对六种市售CSTD进行测试,以70%异丙醇(IPA)作为挑战剂模拟药物配制和给药过程。所有设备操作均在封闭的测试室内进行。使用Miran sapphIRe气体分析仪检测从设备中逸出的IPA蒸汽水平。研究测试包括NIOSH协议指定的两项任务,并在评估中增加了额外步骤。每个设备的任务重复进行10次。六个测试的CSTD中只有三个(Equashield®、HALO®和PhaSealTM)在所有执行任务中的平均IPA蒸汽释放量低于可量化性能阈值(1.0 ppm)。该值由NIOSH选定,以代表成功防护的性能阈值。其余三个CSTD在IPA操作过程中的不同时间蒸汽释放量高于1 ppm。测试的Equashield®、HALO®和PhaSealTM设备符合2015年NIOSH协议的可量化性能阈值,可作为真正的密闭系统运行。可量化的有效数据可能有助于产品选择。

相似文献

1
Evaluating Six Commercially Available Closed-System Drug-Transfer Devices Against NIOSH's 2015 Draft Vapor Protocol.
Hosp Pharm. 2020 Dec;55(6):391-399. doi: 10.1177/0018578719848730. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
2
Evaluation of three barrier-type closed system transfer devices using the 2015 NIOSH vapor containment performance draft protocol.
Drugs Ther Perspect. 2022;38(4):177-184. doi: 10.1007/s40267-022-00905-x. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
4
Performance testing protocol for closed-system transfer devices used during pharmacy compounding and administration of hazardous drugs.
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 31;13(10):e0205263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205263. eCollection 2018.
5
Assessment of unintended volume loss of six closed system transfer devices.
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2020 Jul;26(5):1134-1140. doi: 10.1177/1078155219888682. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
6
Challenges of Using Closed System Transfer Devices With Biological Drug Products: An Industry Perspective.
J Pharm Sci. 2020 Jan;109(1):22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2019.10.042. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
8
Evaluation of Different Quality-Relevant Aspects of Closed System Transfer Devices (CSTDs).
Pharm Res. 2020 Apr 9;37(4):81. doi: 10.1007/s11095-020-02784-1.
9
Closed-system transfer device use with oncology biologics: A survey of Canadian healthcare practitioners.
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2022 Jun;28(4):805-815. doi: 10.1177/10781552211010928. Epub 2021 May 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance testing protocol for closed-system transfer devices used during pharmacy compounding and administration of hazardous drugs.
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 31;13(10):e0205263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205263. eCollection 2018.
2
ASHP Guidelines on Handling Hazardous Drugs.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Dec 15;75(24):1996-2031. doi: 10.2146/ajhp180564. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
4
Multicenter evaluation of a new closed system drug-transfer device in reducing surface contamination by antineoplastic hazardous drugs.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Feb 15;75(4):199-211. doi: 10.2146/ajhp160948. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
5
A review of surface wipe sampling compared to biologic monitoring for occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017 Mar;14(3):159-174. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1237026.
6
Antineoplastic drug contamination in the urine of Canadian healthcare workers.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015 Oct;88(7):933-41. doi: 10.1007/s00420-015-1026-1. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
9
Antineoplastic drug contamination of surfaces throughout the hospital medication system in Canadian hospitals.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10(7):374-83. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.789743.
10
Use of a closed system drug-transfer device eliminates surface contamination with antineoplastic agents.
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2013 Jun;19(2):99-104. doi: 10.1177/1078155212468367. Epub 2013 Jan 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验