Department of Regulatory Science, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan.
Office of New Drug III, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), Tokyo, Japan.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jun;109(6):1555-1563. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2121. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
We identified the major points that are described in the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) E17 guideline but have not been considered in the past multiregional clinical trials (MRCTs) used for drug approval in Japan to elucidate potential challenges in the implementation of the ICH E17 guideline in Japan. Based on the analysis of 167 MRCTs of 130 drugs, several points, such as the same dose setting and consistency between the overall and Japanese populations, in addition to good clinical practice compliance, have been well considered in ≥ 75% of MRCTs. In contrast, the use of relevant guidelines for disease and primary end point definitions, standardization of efficacy/safety information, sample size allocation, as well as training/validation on subject selection and primary end point, have been addressed less adequately and may need to be considered when planning future MRCTs. This study provides useful information for the implementation of the ICH E17 guideline in Japan.
我们确定了国际人用药品注册技术协调会(ICH)E17 指导原则中描述的要点,但这些要点在过去用于日本药物批准的多区域临床试验(MRCT)中并未被考虑,以阐明在日本实施 ICH E17 指导原则时可能面临的挑战。基于对 130 种药物的 167 项 MRCT 的分析,≥75%的 MRCT 充分考虑了相同剂量设置和总体人群与日本人群之间的一致性,以及良好的临床实践合规性等要点。相比之下,对于疾病和主要终点定义、疗效/安全性信息标准化、样本量分配,以及对受试者选择和主要终点的培训/验证,使用相关指南的情况不够充分,在规划未来的 MRCT 时可能需要考虑这些因素。本研究为在日本实施 ICH E17 指导原则提供了有用的信息。