• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮下脓肿的线性切开刮除术与造顶引流术对比:一项随机临床试验

Linear incision and curettage vs. deroofing and drainage in subcutaneous abscess. A randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Sørensen C, Hjortrup A, Moesgaard F, Lykkegaard-Nielsen M

机构信息

Surgical Department A, Sundby Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Chir Scand. 1987 Nov-Dec;153(11-12):659-60.

PMID:3324596
Abstract

Linear incision plus curettage under antibiotic cover was compared with conventional deroofing and drainage of subcutaneous abscess in a randomized study of 50 patients. The median healing time was 9 days following linear incision and curettage and 15 days after deroofing and drainage (p less than 0.05). There was no recurrence of abscess during follow-up for 6 months. Linear incision plus curettage under single-dose antibiotic cover thus proved to be a safe method with significantly shorter healing time than after conventional deroofing an drainage.

摘要

在一项针对50名患者的随机研究中,对比了在抗生素覆盖下进行线性切口加刮除术与传统的皮下脓肿造顶引流术。线性切口加刮除术后的中位愈合时间为9天,造顶引流术后为15天(p小于0.05)。在6个月的随访期间脓肿无复发。因此,单剂量抗生素覆盖下的线性切口加刮除术被证明是一种安全的方法,其愈合时间明显短于传统的造顶引流术。

相似文献

1
Linear incision and curettage vs. deroofing and drainage in subcutaneous abscess. A randomized clinical trial.皮下脓肿的线性切开刮除术与造顶引流术对比:一项随机临床试验
Acta Chir Scand. 1987 Nov-Dec;153(11-12):659-60.
2
Incision and drainage v. incision, curettage and suture under antibiotic cover in anorectal abscess. A randomized study with 3-year follow-up.肛门直肠脓肿切开引流术与抗生素覆盖下切开、刮除及缝合术的比较:一项为期3年随访的随机研究
Acta Chir Scand. 1984;150(8):689-92.
3
[Treatment of Bartholin's abscess. Marsupialization versus incision, curettage and suture under antibiotic cover--a randomized trial with a 6-months follow-up].[巴氏腺脓肿的治疗。造袋术与在抗生素覆盖下切开、刮除及缝合的对比——一项为期6个月随访的随机试验]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1994 Mar 28;156(13):1965-7.
4
[Treatment of episiotomy wound infections. Incision and drainage versus incision, curettage and sutures under antibiotic cover--a randomized trial].[会阴切开术伤口感染的治疗。切开引流与在抗生素覆盖下切开、刮除及缝合——一项随机试验]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1994 Aug 22;156(34):4829, 4832-3.
5
[The comparison of incision and drainage with skin excision and curettage in the treatment of acute pilonidal abscess].[切开引流术与皮肤切除术及刮除术治疗急性藏毛窦脓肿的比较]
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2003 Apr;9(2):120-3.
6
Incision and loop drainage: a minimally invasive technique for subcutaneous abscess management in children.切开和环引流术:一种用于小儿皮下脓肿管理的微创技术。
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Mar;45(3):606-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.06.013.
7
Comparison between drainage and curettage in the treatment of acute pilonidal abscess.急性藏毛窦脓肿治疗中引流术与刮除术的比较。
Saudi Med J. 2005 Apr;26(4):553-5.
8
Treatment of acute abscesses in the casualty department.急诊科急性脓肿的治疗。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Jun 19;284(6332):1827-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6332.1827.
9
[Incision or primary suture in acute pilonidal abscesses. A prospective randomized study].
Ugeskr Laeger. 1985 Oct 28;147(44):3479-81.
10
Hip flexion deformity secondary to acute pyogenic psoas abscess.
Orthop Rev. 1987 Feb;16(2):67-77.

引用本文的文献

1
Incision and drainage of cutaneous abscess with or without cavity packing: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials.切开排脓术(伴或不伴腔隙填塞)治疗皮肤脓肿:一项随机对照试验的系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Jun;406(4):981-991. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01941-9. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
2
Internal dressings for healing perianal abscess cavities.用于肛周脓肿腔愈合的内敷料。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 26;2016(8):CD011193. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011193.pub2.