Center for Behavioral Health and Justice, Wayne State University School of Social Work, 5201 Cass Avenue, Prentis, Suite 226, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Center for Behavioral Health and Justice, Wayne State University School of Social Work, 5201 Cass Avenue, Prentis, Suite 226, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 Nov-Dec;73:101644. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101644. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
This study looked at, in addition to subsequent arrest, emergency medical services (EMS) events as an outcome of participation in mental health court (MHC).
We linked information from participants of a MHC in Marion County, Indiana with jail booking and EMS services data. To understand programmatic impact, we looked at differences in jail bookings and EMS events within one year prior to and one year after MHC participation. We ran paired t-tests to understand whether correlations were significant. We also considered differences in outcomes between those who successfully completed MHC versus those who did not.
MHC participation was significantly associated with a reduction in jail bookings and EMS events in the 12 months after program participation compared to the 12 months before. When comparing MHC participant groups, a significant reduction in jail bookings is found consistently whereas a significant reduction in EMS events was found in only some participant groups: the entire MHC group and the misdemeanor-level court (PAIR) participants when they successfully completed the program.
EMS utilization should be an outcome of consideration in evaluating the success and cost savings of MHCs. Where MHCs do not result in significantly reduced EMS events, communities should consider what individual-level and community-level factors contribute to this and adjust accordingly.
本研究除了后续逮捕外,还将紧急医疗服务(EMS)事件作为参与心理健康法庭(MHC)的结果进行了研究。
我们将印第安纳州马里恩县 MHC 参与者的信息与监狱登记和 EMS 服务数据进行了关联。为了了解计划的影响,我们研究了 MHC 参与前后一年内在监狱登记和 EMS 事件方面的差异。我们进行了配对 t 检验以了解相关性是否显著。我们还考虑了成功完成 MHC 与未完成 MHC 的参与者之间的结果差异。
与 MHC 参与前 12 个月相比,MHC 参与后 12 个月的监禁登记和 EMS 事件明显减少。在比较 MHC 参与者群体时,发现监禁登记的显著减少是一致的,而在某些参与者群体中仅发现 EMS 事件的显著减少:整个 MHC 群体和轻罪级别的法院(PAIR)参与者在成功完成该计划时。
EMS 使用情况应作为评估 MHC 成功和节省成本的考虑因素。如果 MHC 没有导致 EMS 事件显著减少,社区应考虑个体和社区层面的因素对此有何影响,并进行相应调整。