• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理健康治疗法庭的三阶段模式:毕业生观点的定性分析。

A Three Stage Model for Mental Health Treatment Court: A Qualitative Analysis of Graduates' Perspectives.

机构信息

University of Scranton, 800 Linden Street, Scranton, PA, 18510, USA.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2019 May;55(4):590-598. doi: 10.1007/s10597-018-0346-5. Epub 2018 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-018-0346-5
PMID:30353447
Abstract

Mental Health Treatment Courts (MHTC) address the overrepresentation of individuals with mental health disorders in the criminal justice system and strive to minimize the "revolving door" cycle of arrest/incarceration/release/re-arrest. A qualitative research group interview design was conducted with program graduates resulting in a three stage model. Participant's motivation was initially to avoid jail, but over time participants begin to make intentional choices leading to mental health recovery. Participants also described the importance of their relationship with the staff and the judge as well as the need for trust, understanding, and respect throughout the program. Recommendations for future research and program development are discussed.

摘要

心理健康治疗法庭(MHTC)针对精神障碍患者在刑事司法系统中比例过高的问题,努力减少逮捕/监禁/释放/再逮捕的“循环”现象。对项目毕业生进行了定性研究小组访谈设计,结果得出了一个三阶段模型。参与者最初的动机是避免入狱,但随着时间的推移,参与者开始做出有意识的选择,从而促进精神健康的恢复。参与者还描述了他们与工作人员和法官的关系的重要性,以及在整个项目过程中信任、理解和尊重的必要性。讨论了对未来研究和项目发展的建议。

相似文献

1
A Three Stage Model for Mental Health Treatment Court: A Qualitative Analysis of Graduates' Perspectives.心理健康治疗法庭的三阶段模式:毕业生观点的定性分析。
Community Ment Health J. 2019 May;55(4):590-598. doi: 10.1007/s10597-018-0346-5. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
2
Implementation of MISSION-Criminal Justice in a Treatment Court: Preliminary Outcomes Among Individuals With Co-occurring Disorders.实施 MISSION-刑事司法在治疗法庭中:共病个体的初步结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Nov 1;70(11):1044-1048. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800570. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
3
Arrest and emergency medical services events among participants from one of the first mental health courts.一个精神健康法庭的参与者的逮捕和紧急医疗服务事件。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 Nov-Dec;73:101644. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101644. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
4
Integrating a Co-occurring Disorders Intervention in Drug Courts: An Open Pilot Trial.将共病干预措施融入药物法庭:一项开放试点试验。
Community Ment Health J. 2019 Feb;55(2):222-231. doi: 10.1007/s10597-018-0255-7. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
5
Effectiveness of a mental health court in reducing criminal recidivism and violence.心理健康法庭在减少刑事累犯和暴力行为方面的有效性。
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;164(9):1395-403. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06101664.
6
Therapeutic Jurisprudence in Health Research: Enlisting Legal Theory as a Methodological Guide in an Interdisciplinary Case Study of Mental Health and Criminal Law.健康研究中的治疗法学:在心理健康与刑法的跨学科案例研究中运用法律理论作为方法指南
Qual Health Res. 2015 Sep;25(9):1300-11. doi: 10.1177/1049732314560197. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
7
The impact on taxpayer costs of a jail diversion program for people with serious mental illness.针对患有严重精神疾病者的监狱分流项目对纳税人成本的影响。
Eval Program Plann. 2013 Dec;41:31-7. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
8
Evaluation and Restoration of Competence to Stand Trial: Intercepting the Forensic System Using the Sequential Intercept Model.评估和恢复审判能力:使用序贯拦截模型介入法医系统。
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Jul 1;71(7):698-705. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900484. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
9
A Comparison of Participants in Two Community-Based Programs: Assisted Outpatient Treatment and a Mental Health Court.两种基于社区的项目(辅助门诊治疗和心理健康法庭)参与者的比较。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Sep 1;69(9):1001-1006. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700341. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
10
Transitioning between systems of care: missed opportunities for engaging adults with serious mental illness and criminal justice involvement.在照护系统之间的转换:错失机会使患有严重精神疾病和有刑事司法涉入的成年人参与进来。
Behav Sci Law. 2013 Jul-Aug;31(4):444-56. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2074.

引用本文的文献

1
New justice system responses to mentally impaired defendants in New Zealand.新西兰针对精神受损被告的新司法系统应对措施。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 Jul 13;29(4):549-562. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1938275. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Disposition of Charges, Out-of-Home Mental Health Treatment, and Juvenile Justice Recidivism.指控的处理、院外心理健康治疗与青少年司法再犯
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2017 Aug;61(11):1195-1209. doi: 10.1177/0306624X15615383. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
2
Prospective study of violence risk reduction by a mental health court.心理健康法庭降低暴力风险的前瞻性研究。
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Jun;66(6):598-603. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400203. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
3
A multisite study of the prevalence of serious mental illness, PTSD, and substance use disorders of women in jail.
一项关于监狱女性中严重精神疾病、创伤后应激障碍和物质使用障碍患病率的多地点研究。
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 May 1;65(5):670-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300172.
4
Effect of mental health courts on arrests and jail days: a multisite study.心理健康法庭对逮捕率和监禁天数的影响:一项多地点研究。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;68(2):167-72. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.134. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
5
Prevalence of serious mental illness among jail inmates.监狱服刑人员中严重精神疾病的患病率。
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Jun;60(6):761-5. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.6.761.
6
Effectiveness of a mental health court in reducing criminal recidivism and violence.心理健康法庭在减少刑事累犯和暴力行为方面的有效性。
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;164(9):1395-403. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06101664.
7
An analysis of the definitions and elements of recovery: a review of the literature.康复的定义与要素分析:文献综述
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2007 Summer;31(1):9-22. doi: 10.2975/31.1.2007.9.22.
8
Mental health court outcomes: a comparison of re-arrest and re-arrest severity between mental health court and traditional court participants.心理健康法庭的结果:心理健康法庭参与者与传统法庭参与者之间再次被捕情况及再次被捕严重程度的比较。
Law Hum Behav. 2006 Dec;30(6):659-74. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9061-9.
9
Clinical outcomes of defendants in mental health court.心理健康法庭中被告的临床结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Jul;56(7):829-34. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.7.829.
10
Lifting the cover on drug courts: evaluation findings and policy concerns.揭开毒品法庭的面纱:评估结果与政策关切
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2005 Jun;49(3):239-59. doi: 10.1177/0306624X04273200.