• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗糖尿病药物共付额增加对血糖控制的影响:芬兰 2 型糖尿病患者的中断时间序列研究。

Impact of co-payment level increase of antidiabetic medications on glycaemic control: an interrupted time-series study among Finnish patients with type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, P.O.Box. 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland.

Joint Municipal Authority for North Karelia Social and Health Services (Siun Sote), Joensuu, Finland.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 27;20(1):1095. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05952-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-05952-6
PMID:33246453
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7694920/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A new special reimbursement scheme (SRS) for non-insulin medications used for treatment of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes (T2D) was implemented in Finland on January 1, 2017. The new SRS affected all community-dwelling Finnish T2D patients as all community-dwelling residents are eligible for reimbursement for prescription medications. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of this co-payment increase on glycaemic control among Finnish T2D patients.

METHODS

Data on glycaemic control were collected with HbA1c measures from electronic health records from primary health care and specialized care in the North Karelia region, Finland, from patients with a confirmed T2D diagnosis in 2012 who were alive on January 1, 2017 (n = 8436). Average HbA1c levels were measured monthly 36 months before and 33 months after the policy change. Consumption of diabetes medications was measured with defined daily doses (DDDs) based on reimbursed medication purchases. Interrupted time series design analysed with segmented regression model was applied to examine the effect of the policy change on average HbA1c levels.

RESULTS

Eight thousand one hundred forty-three T2D patients had at least one HbA1c measurement within 01/2014-9/2019. Mean age of the patients was 68.1 (SD 11.3) years and 53.0% were women. Average time since T2D diagnosis was 11.5 (SD 6.1) years. An estimated increase of 0.81 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.04-1.58) mmol/mol in average HbA1c levels was detected at the time of the policy change. In subgroup analyses, strongest effects were detected among patients who used only other diabetes medications than insulin or metformin in 2016 (3.56 mmol/mol, 95% CI 2.50-4.62). Meanwhile, yearly consumption of diabetes medications decreased slightly from 618.9 (SD 487.8) DDDs/patient in 2016 to 602.9 (SD 475.6) DDDs/patient in 2017 (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneously with the increase of the co-payment level, the average HbA1c level increased among T2D patients from the North Karelia region, Finland. This may be explained by the decreased consumption of diabetes medications between 2016 and 2017. Special attention should be allocated to glycaemic control of patients utilizing only other antidiabetic medications than metformin or insulin.

摘要

背景

2017 年 1 月 1 日,芬兰实施了一种新的非胰岛素类药物治疗 2 型糖尿病(T2D)的特殊报销方案(SRS)。新的 SRS 影响了所有居住在社区的芬兰 T2D 患者,因为所有居住在社区的居民都有资格报销处方药。本研究的目的是评估这种共同支付增加对芬兰 T2D 患者血糖控制的影响。

方法

从芬兰北卡累利阿地区的初级保健和专科保健的电子健康记录中收集了 2012 年确诊的 T2D 患者的血糖控制数据,这些患者在 2017 年 1 月 1 日仍然存活(n=8436)。在政策变化前 36 个月和后 33 个月每月测量平均 HbA1c 水平。根据报销药物购买情况,使用规定的日剂量(DDD)测量糖尿病药物的使用情况。采用分段回归模型分析中断时间序列设计,以检查政策变化对平均 HbA1c 水平的影响。

结果

8143 名 T2D 患者在 2014 年 1 月至 2019 年 9 月期间至少有一次 HbA1c 测量值。患者的平均年龄为 68.1(SD 11.3)岁,53.0%为女性。T2D 诊断后的平均时间为 11.5(SD 6.1)年。政策变化时,平均 HbA1c 水平估计增加了 0.81(95%置信区间,CI,0.04-1.58)mmol/mol。在亚组分析中,在 2016 年仅使用胰岛素或二甲双胍以外的其他糖尿病药物的患者中,效果最强(3.56mmol/mol,95%CI 2.50-4.62)。与此同时,2016 年每位患者的糖尿病药物年消耗量从 618.9(SD 487.8)DDD/患者降至 2017 年的 602.9(SD 475.6)DDD/患者(p=0.048)。

结论

随着共同支付水平的提高,芬兰北卡累利阿地区的 T2D 患者的平均 HbA1c 水平也有所升高。这可能是由于 2016 年至 2017 年间糖尿病药物的消耗量减少所致。应特别关注仅使用二甲双胍或胰岛素以外的其他抗糖尿病药物的患者的血糖控制。

相似文献

1
Impact of co-payment level increase of antidiabetic medications on glycaemic control: an interrupted time-series study among Finnish patients with type 2 diabetes.抗糖尿病药物共付额增加对血糖控制的影响:芬兰 2 型糖尿病患者的中断时间序列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 27;20(1):1095. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05952-6.
2
Contacting dropouts from type 2 diabetes care in public primary health care: description of the patient population.在公共初级卫生保健中联系2型糖尿病护理的失访者:患者群体描述
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Sep;34(3):267-73. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1207144. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
3
Type 2 diabetes medication and HbA1c levels in North Karelia Finland, 2013-2019.2013-2019 年芬兰北卡累利阿地区 2 型糖尿病药物治疗与糖化血红蛋白水平
Diabet Med. 2022 Sep;39(9):e14866. doi: 10.1111/dme.14866. Epub 2022 May 16.
4
Trends in clinical characteristics, medication use, and glycemic control in insulin-treated patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in Finland in 2012-2019: Nationwide real-world evidence study.2012-2019 年芬兰 1 型和 2 型糖尿病胰岛素治疗患者的临床特征、药物使用和血糖控制趋势:全国真实世界证据研究。
J Diabetes. 2024 May;16(5):e13491. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13491. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
5
Glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in seven European countries: findings from the Real-Life Effectiveness and Care Patterns of Diabetes Management (RECAP-DM) study.七个欧洲国家2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制:糖尿病管理的真实生活有效性和护理模式(RECAP-DM)研究结果
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008 Jun;10 Suppl 1:8-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00881.x.
6
The impact of a co-payment increase on the consumption of type 2 antidiabetics - A nationwide interrupted time series analysis.共付额增加对 2 型抗糖尿病药物消费的影响——一项全国范围的中断时间序列分析。
Health Policy. 2021 Sep;125(9):1166-1172. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 21.
7
Comparing the Effect of Early Versus Delayed Metformin Treatment on Glycaemic Parameters Among Australian Adults With Incident Diabetes: Evidence Using a National General Practice Database.比较澳大利亚新诊断糖尿病成年患者早期与延迟使用二甲双胍治疗对血糖参数的影响:基于全国普通实践数据库的证据。
Clin Ther. 2024 May;46(5):396-403. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.03.001. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
8
Improving type 2 diabetes mellitus glycaemic outcomes is possible without spending more on medication: Lessons from the UK National Diabetes Audit.改善 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制结果无需在药物治疗上花费更多:来自英国国家糖尿病审计的经验教训。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jan;20(1):185-194. doi: 10.1111/dom.13067. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
9
Short-term impact of co-payment level increase on the use of medication and patient-reported outcomes in Finnish patients with type 2 diabetes.芬兰 2 型糖尿病患者共付水平提高对药物使用和患者报告结局的短期影响。
Health Policy. 2020 Dec;124(12):1310-1316. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
10
Changes in HbA1c and frequency of measuring HbA1c and adjusting glucose-lowering medications in the 10 years following diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: a population-based study in the UK.HbA1c 变化及确诊 2 型糖尿病后 10 年内 HbA1c 测量频率和降糖药物调整情况:英国一项基于人群的研究。
Diabetologia. 2014 Aug;57(8):1586-94. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3250-8. Epub 2014 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Time Trends of Body Mass Index and its Impact on Glycemic Control Among Finnish Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.芬兰2型糖尿病患者体重指数的时间趋势及其对血糖控制的影响
Diabetes Ther. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s13300-025-01763-2.
2
Second-line pharmacotherapy intensification after metformin monotherapy in type 2 diabetes: a nationwide register study from Finland during 2011-2022.二甲双胍单药治疗后二线药物强化治疗 2 型糖尿病:2011-2022 年芬兰全国登记研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 19;24(1):944. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11325-0.
3
Drawing up the public national Rational Pharmacotherapy Action Plan as part of social and health services reform in Finland: a bottom-up approach involving stakeholders.

本文引用的文献

1
Short-term impact of co-payment level increase on the use of medication and patient-reported outcomes in Finnish patients with type 2 diabetes.芬兰 2 型糖尿病患者共付水平提高对药物使用和患者报告结局的短期影响。
Health Policy. 2020 Dec;124(12):1310-1316. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
2
The effects of reimbursement reform of antidiabetic medicines from the patients' perspective - a survey among patients with type 2 diabetes in Finland.从患者角度看糖尿病药物报销改革的效果——芬兰 2 型糖尿病患者的调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 29;19(1):769. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4633-9.
3
作为芬兰社会和卫生服务改革的一部分,制定国家公共合理药物治疗行动计划:涉及利益相关者的自下而上方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 16;24(1):631. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11068-y.
4
Austerity, economic hardship and access to medications: a repeated cross-sectional population survey study, 2013-2020.紧缩政策、经济困难与药物获取:2013-2020 年的重复横断面人群调查研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2023 Mar;77(3):160-167. doi: 10.1136/jech-2022-219706. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
5
Socioeconomic inequalities in insulin initiation among individuals with type 2 diabetes - A quasi-experimental nationwide register study.2型糖尿病患者胰岛素起始治疗中的社会经济不平等——一项全国性准实验性登记研究
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Aug 9;19:101178. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101178. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Type 2 diabetes medication and HbA1c levels in North Karelia Finland, 2013-2019.2013-2019 年芬兰北卡累利阿地区 2 型糖尿病药物治疗与糖化血红蛋白水平
Diabet Med. 2022 Sep;39(9):e14866. doi: 10.1111/dme.14866. Epub 2022 May 16.
7
Citizens' opinions and experiences related to costs and reimbursements for medications in times of retrenchment: cross-sectional population surveys in 2015 and 2017.公民对紧缩时期药物费用和报销的意见和经验:2015 年和 2017 年的横断面人口调查。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Mar 9;21(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01631-6.
8
The effect of pharmaceutical co-payment increase on the use of social assistance-A natural experiment study.药品共付额增加对社会救助使用的影响——一项自然实验研究。
PLoS One. 2021 May 5;16(5):e0250305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250305. eCollection 2021.
Electronic Health Records as Valuable Data Sources in the Health Care Quality Improvement Process.
电子健康记录作为医疗质量改进过程中的宝贵数据源。
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2019 May 30;6:2333392819852879. doi: 10.1177/2333392819852879. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
4
Maintenance of good glycaemic control is challenging - A cohort study of type 2 diabetes patient in North Karelia, Finland.维持良好的血糖控制具有挑战性——芬兰北卡累利阿地区2型糖尿病患者的队列研究。
Int J Clin Pract. 2019 Apr;73(4):e13313. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13313. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
5
Novel Type 2 Diabetes Medication Access and Effect of Patient Cost Sharing.新型2型糖尿病药物的可及性及患者费用分担的影响
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Sep;24(9):847-855. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.9.847.
6
Rates of glycaemic deterioration in a real-world population with type 2 diabetes.真实世界 2 型糖尿病患者血糖恶化的发生率。
Diabetologia. 2018 Mar;61(3):607-615. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4519-5. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
7
8. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment.8. 血糖治疗的药理学方法。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jan;40(Suppl 1):S64-S74. doi: 10.2337/dc17-S011.
8
Impact of type 2 diabetes medication cost sharing on patient outcomes and health plan costs.2型糖尿病药物费用分担对患者治疗结果和健康计划成本的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Jun;22(6):433-40.
9
Use of interrupted time series analysis in evaluating health care quality improvements.使用中断时间序列分析评估医疗质量改进
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6 Suppl):S38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.08.002.
10
How patient cost-sharing trends affect adherence and outcomes: a literature review.患者费用分担趋势如何影响依从性和治疗结果:一项文献综述。
P T. 2012 Jan;37(1):45-55.