Henk Henry J, Lopez Janice M S, Bookhart Brahim K
1 Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota.
2 Janssen Scientific Affairs, Titusville, New Jersey.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Sep;24(9):847-855. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.9.847.
Although drug formulary restrictions may reduce use of prescription medication and pharmacy costs, the effect of patient cost sharing on medication adherence and health care utilization and cost is unclear.
To evaluate the relationship between patient cost sharing for novel type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) medications and medication adherence, persistence, and health care utilization and cost.
This retrospective study used medical and pharmacy claims linked to pharmacy benefit plan design data. Patients with T2DM were identified via ICD-9-CM codes (medical claims), outpatient prescription fills (pharmacy claims), and pharmacy benefit design information. Patients with T2DM treated with novel T2DM medications (DPP4 or GLP-1) were enrolled in plans with fixed or coinsurance medication copayment structures and followed for 12-48 months. Endpoints included medication persistence and adherence and total all-cause health care cost. Multivariable regression analysis estimated the effect of benefit design parameters, adjusting for baseline patient characteristics.
The integrated database included 36,475 patients with T2DM. The majority (83.1%) had fixed copayment plans, and 3-tier plans were common (93.1%). Higher third-tier copayment was associated with poorer medication adherence and persistence but not total health care cost during follow-up. A $10 higher third-tier copayment was associated with 11% greater risk of novel T2DM medication discontinuation and 3% lower adherence. A comparison of patients with fixed versus coinsurance plans found that fixed plans were associated with higher adjusted persistence and total all-cause health care costs.
Higher medication copayment amounts were associated with lower patient medication adherence and persistence in T2DM but not total health care costs, as health plan costs decreased while patient out-of-pocket costs increased. We observed higher total all-cause health care costs among T2DM patients with a fixed copay (vs. coinsurance) pharmacy benefit. Additional research incorporating plan design information is needed to further examine this finding.
This study was funded by Janssen Scientific Affairs, which was involved in study design, interpretation of data, editing manuscript content, and had final approval of the manuscript before submission. Lopez and Bookhart are employed by Janssen Scientific Affairs. At the time of this study, Henk was employed by Optum HEOR, which was contracted by Janssen to conduct this study. Portions of this study were presented at the 21st Annual International Meeting, ISPOR; May 21-25, 2016; in Washington, DC.
尽管药品处方集限制可能会减少处方药的使用和药房成本,但患者成本分担对药物依从性、医疗保健利用和成本的影响尚不清楚。
评估新型2型糖尿病(T2DM)药物的患者成本分担与药物依从性、持续性、医疗保健利用和成本之间的关系。
这项回顾性研究使用了与药房福利计划设计数据相关联的医疗和药房理赔数据。通过ICD-9-CM编码(医疗理赔)、门诊处方配药(药房理赔)和药房福利设计信息来识别T2DM患者。使用新型T2DM药物(二肽基肽酶4抑制剂或胰高血糖素样肽-1)治疗的T2DM患者被纳入具有固定或共付额药物自付结构的计划,并随访12至48个月。终点包括药物持续性和依从性以及全因医疗保健总成本。多变量回归分析估计了福利设计参数的影响,并对基线患者特征进行了调整。
综合数据库包括36475名T2DM患者。大多数(83.1%)患者有固定自付计划,三级计划很常见(93.1%)。较高的三级自付额与较差的药物依从性和持续性相关,但与随访期间的全因医疗保健成本无关。三级自付额每增加10美元,新型T2DM药物停药风险增加11%,依从性降低3%。对固定计划与共付计划患者的比较发现,固定计划与更高的调整后持续性和全因医疗保健总成本相关。
较高的药物自付额与T2DM患者较低的药物依从性和持续性相关,但与全因医疗保健成本无关,因为健康计划成本降低而患者自付成本增加。我们观察到,在药房福利为固定自付(相对于共付)的T2DM患者中,全因医疗保健总成本更高。需要纳入计划设计信息的进一步研究来进一步检验这一发现。
本研究由杨森科学事务部资助,该部门参与了研究设计、数据解释、编辑稿件内容,并在稿件提交前最终批准了稿件。洛佩兹和布克哈特受雇于杨森科学事务部。在本研究开展时,亨克受雇于Optum HEOR,该公司受杨森委托开展本研究。本研究的部分内容在2016年5月21日至25日于华盛顿特区举行的第21届国际药物经济学与结果研究学会(ISPOR)年会上进行了展示。