• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于单节段侧路腰椎间融合术后即刻间接减压充分的相关因素的聚类分析。

Cluster analysis to predict factors associated with sufficient indirect decompression immediately after single-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Jan;83:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.11.014. Epub 2020 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2020.11.014
PMID:33246902
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Changes in indirect decompression using lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) were classified into three clusters based on cluster analysis. We investigated cage variables and position to assess the effects of single-level LLIF on indirect decompression.

METHODS

Cluster analysis was used to classify patients into three groups based on the change in the axial cross-sectional spinal canal area (ΔCSA): group 1 with slight postoperative indirect decompression (n = 35); group 2 with average indirect decompression (n = 19); and group 3 with marked indirect decompression (n = 13). Preoperative and immediately postoperative imaging data were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Postoperative segmental lordosis, anterior, posterior, and average disc height increased significantly in each group, but the differences between groups were not significant. Cage length (p = 0.251) and cage height (p = 0.709) did not differ, but cage position differed significantly between groups (p < 0.05). ΔCSA correlated significantly with cage position for all 67 levels (r = 0.411, p < 0.01), but this association was not significant in group 2 (r =  - 0.367, p = 0.122) or group 3 (r =  - 0.005, p = 0.986). ΔCSA correlated with cage height in group 2 (r = 0.645, p < 0.01) and with cage width in group 3 (r = 0.644, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The cluster analysis results suggest that placing the cage in the posterior position might be effective for expanding the CSA, but other factors, such as cage height or width, may also influence the sufficiency of LLIF.

摘要

目的

基于聚类分析,将经侧方腰椎椎间融合术(LLIF)间接减压的变化分为三类。我们研究了椎间融合器的变量和位置,以评估单节段 LLIF 对间接减压的影响。

方法

根据轴向横截面积(CSA)变化,采用聚类分析将患者分为三组:组 1 术后间接减压轻微(n=35);组 2 术后间接减压中等(n=19);组 3 术后间接减压显著(n=13)。比较组间术前和术后即刻影像学数据。

结果

每组术后节段前凸、椎体前缘、后缘及平均椎间盘高度均显著增加,但组间差异无统计学意义。椎间融合器长度(p=0.251)和椎间融合器高度(p=0.709)无差异,但椎间融合器位置有显著差异(p<0.05)。67 个节段 CSA 的变化与椎间融合器位置均显著相关(r=0.411,p<0.01),但在组 2(r=-0.367,p=0.122)和组 3(r=-0.005,p=0.986)中无显著相关性。在组 2,CSA 的变化与椎间融合器高度(r=0.645,p<0.01)相关,在组 3 与椎间融合器宽度(r=0.644,p<0.05)相关。

结论

聚类分析结果表明,将椎间融合器置于后侧位置可能有助于扩大 CSA,但其他因素,如椎间融合器高度或宽度,也可能影响 LLIF 的充分性。

相似文献

1
Cluster analysis to predict factors associated with sufficient indirect decompression immediately after single-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion.基于单节段侧路腰椎间融合术后即刻间接减压充分的相关因素的聚类分析。
J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Jan;83:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.11.014. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
2
Indirect Decompression on MRI Chronologically Progresses After Immediate Postlateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Results From a Minimum of 2 Years Follow-Up.直接减压术后 MRI 随访结果:至少 2 年的随访。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Dec 15;44(24):E1411-E1418. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003180.
3
Effect of indirect neural decompression through oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease.经斜外侧椎间融合术间接神经减压治疗退变性腰椎疾病的效果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Feb 1;40(3):E175-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000703.
4
The Evaluation of Indirect Neural Decompression After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography Myelogram.使用术中计算机断层扫描脊髓造影评估腰椎侧方椎间融合术后的间接神经减压效果。
World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:e710-e718. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.146. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
5
The Ideal Cage Position for Achieving Both Indirect Neural Decompression and Segmental Angle Restoration in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF).在腰椎侧方椎间融合术(LLIF)中实现间接神经减压和节段角度恢复的理想椎间融合器位置。
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jul;30(6):E784-E790. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000406.
6
Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion.单纯侧方椎间融合术后 cage 沉降的影像学和临床评估。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Jul;19(1):110-8. doi: 10.3171/2013.4.SPINE12319. Epub 2013 May 10.
7
Indirect foraminal decompression after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion.侧方经椎间孔椎体间融合术后的间接神经根管减压术。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Apr;16(4):329-33. doi: 10.3171/2012.1.SPINE11528. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
8
Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration following previous lumbar fusion.单纯侧方腰椎间融合术治疗腰椎融合术后症状性邻近节段退变。
Spine J. 2018 Nov;18(11):2025-2032. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
9
Radiographic and clinical evaluation of single-level lateral interbody fusion in patients with severe stenosis analyzed using cluster analysis.采用聚类分析对严重狭窄患者单节段侧方椎间融合的影像学和临床评估。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Nov 24;100(47):e27775. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027775.
10
Indirect Decompression Effect to Central Canal and Ligamentum Flavum After Extreme Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion.极外侧腰椎椎间融合术与斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术后对椎管和黄韧带的间接减压作用。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Sep 1;45(17):E1077-E1084. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003521.

引用本文的文献

1
Endplate morphology affects the risk of complications by changing the grafted bony occupancy rate in OLIF patients.终板形态通过改变OLIF手术患者移植骨的骨占有率来影响并发症的风险。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Aug 7;26(1):761. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-09036-6.
2
An optimal disc height changes for successful indirect decompression with OLIF.成功进行斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)间接减压时,最佳椎间盘高度会发生变化。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22188. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05562-4.
3
Segmental Lordosis and Disc Height Discrepancies in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages.
使用可扩张椎间融合器行腰椎外侧椎间融合时的节段性脊柱前凸及椎间盘高度差异
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 May 12;19(2):188-199. doi: 10.14444/8726.
4
The analysis of segmental lordosis restored by oblique lumbar interbody fusion and related factors: building up preoperative predicting model.斜外侧腰椎间融合术重建节段性腰椎前凸的分析及相关因素:建立术前预测模型。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 24;25(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07293-5.
5
Clinical significance of redundant nerve roots in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with percutaneous internal fixation.腰椎管狭窄症患者行斜外侧腰椎间融合联合经皮内固定术中冗余神经根的临床意义。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Dec 13;18(1):958. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04449-2.
6
Oblique lateral internal fusion combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in severe lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical and radiographic outcome.斜外侧内固定联合经皮椎弓根螺钉固定治疗重度腰椎管狭窄症:临床和影像学结果。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Nov 20;18(1):882. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04373-5.
7
Assessing Procedural Accuracy in Lateral Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement with Intraoperative CT Navigation.评估腰椎侧方手术中的操作准确性:经皮椎弓根螺钉置入术中CT导航的回顾性分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 3;12(21):6914. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216914.
8
Oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with unilateral versus bilateral posterior fixation in patients with osteoporosis.骨质疏松症患者采用斜外侧椎间融合联合单侧与双侧后路固定的疗效比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Oct 16;18(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04262-x.
9
Comprehensive Assessment of Indirect Decompression Through Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire-Based Analysis.基于日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷的分析:对腰椎侧方椎间融合术间接减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的综合评估
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):656-667. doi: 10.1177/21925682231204254. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
10
Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) compared with unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a 2-year follow-up study.斜外侧椎间融合术(OLIF)与单侧双通道内镜下腰椎椎间融合术(ULIF)治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的比较:一项为期 2 年的随访研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Aug 24;18(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04111-x.