Suppr超能文献

基于单节段侧路腰椎间融合术后即刻间接减压充分的相关因素的聚类分析。

Cluster analysis to predict factors associated with sufficient indirect decompression immediately after single-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Jan;83:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.11.014. Epub 2020 Nov 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Changes in indirect decompression using lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) were classified into three clusters based on cluster analysis. We investigated cage variables and position to assess the effects of single-level LLIF on indirect decompression.

METHODS

Cluster analysis was used to classify patients into three groups based on the change in the axial cross-sectional spinal canal area (ΔCSA): group 1 with slight postoperative indirect decompression (n = 35); group 2 with average indirect decompression (n = 19); and group 3 with marked indirect decompression (n = 13). Preoperative and immediately postoperative imaging data were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Postoperative segmental lordosis, anterior, posterior, and average disc height increased significantly in each group, but the differences between groups were not significant. Cage length (p = 0.251) and cage height (p = 0.709) did not differ, but cage position differed significantly between groups (p < 0.05). ΔCSA correlated significantly with cage position for all 67 levels (r = 0.411, p < 0.01), but this association was not significant in group 2 (r =  - 0.367, p = 0.122) or group 3 (r =  - 0.005, p = 0.986). ΔCSA correlated with cage height in group 2 (r = 0.645, p < 0.01) and with cage width in group 3 (r = 0.644, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The cluster analysis results suggest that placing the cage in the posterior position might be effective for expanding the CSA, but other factors, such as cage height or width, may also influence the sufficiency of LLIF.

摘要

目的

基于聚类分析,将经侧方腰椎椎间融合术(LLIF)间接减压的变化分为三类。我们研究了椎间融合器的变量和位置,以评估单节段 LLIF 对间接减压的影响。

方法

根据轴向横截面积(CSA)变化,采用聚类分析将患者分为三组:组 1 术后间接减压轻微(n=35);组 2 术后间接减压中等(n=19);组 3 术后间接减压显著(n=13)。比较组间术前和术后即刻影像学数据。

结果

每组术后节段前凸、椎体前缘、后缘及平均椎间盘高度均显著增加,但组间差异无统计学意义。椎间融合器长度(p=0.251)和椎间融合器高度(p=0.709)无差异,但椎间融合器位置有显著差异(p<0.05)。67 个节段 CSA 的变化与椎间融合器位置均显著相关(r=0.411,p<0.01),但在组 2(r=-0.367,p=0.122)和组 3(r=-0.005,p=0.986)中无显著相关性。在组 2,CSA 的变化与椎间融合器高度(r=0.645,p<0.01)相关,在组 3 与椎间融合器宽度(r=0.644,p<0.05)相关。

结论

聚类分析结果表明,将椎间融合器置于后侧位置可能有助于扩大 CSA,但其他因素,如椎间融合器高度或宽度,也可能影响 LLIF 的充分性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验