Levin Laura E, Shayegan Leila H, Lucky Anne W, Hook Kristen P, Bruckner Anna L, Feinstein James A, Whittier Susan, Lauren Christine T, Pope Elena, Lara-Corrales Irene, Wiss Karen, McCuaig Catherine C, Powell Julie, Eichenfield Lawrence F, Levy Moise L, Diaz Lucia, Glick Sharon A, Paller Amy S, Price Harper N, Browning John C, Morel Kimberly D
Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Pediatr Dermatol. 2021 Jan;38(1):119-124. doi: 10.1111/pde.14444. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Patients with epidermolysis bullosa (EB) require care of wounds that are colonized or infected with bacteria. A subset of EB patients are at risk for squamous cell carcinoma, and bacterial-host interactions have been considered in this risk. The EB Clinical Characterization and Outcomes Database serves as a repository of information from EB patients at multiple centers in the United States and Canada. Access to this resource enabled broad-scale analysis of wound cultures.
A retrospective analysis of 739 wound cultures from 158 patients from 13 centers between 2001 and 2018.
Of 152 patients with a positive culture, Staphylococcus aureus (SA) was recovered from 131 patients (86%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) from 56 (37%), and Streptococcus pyogenes (GAS) from 34 (22%). Sixty-eight percent of patients had cultures positive for methicillin-sensitive SA, and 47%, methicillin-resistant SA (18 patients had cultures that grew both methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant SA at different points in time). Of 15 patients with SA-positive cultures with recorded mupirocin susceptibility testing, 11 had mupirocin-susceptible SA and 6 patients mupirocin-resistant SA (2 patients grew both mupirocin-susceptible and mupirocin-resistant SA). SCC was reported in 23 patients in the entire database, of whom 10 had documented wound cultures positive for SA, PA, and Proteus species in 90%, 50%, and 20% of cases, respectively.
SA and PA were the most commonly isolated bacteria from wounds. Methicillin resistance and mupirocin resistance were reported in 47% and 40% of patients tested, respectively, highlighting the importance of ongoing antimicrobial strategies to limit antibiotic resistance.
背景/目的:大疱性表皮松解症(EB)患者需要对被细菌定植或感染的伤口进行护理。一部分EB患者有患鳞状细胞癌的风险,细菌与宿主的相互作用被认为与这种风险有关。EB临床特征与结果数据库是美国和加拿大多个中心的EB患者信息库。利用这一资源能够对伤口培养物进行大规模分析。
对2001年至2018年间来自13个中心的158例患者的739份伤口培养物进行回顾性分析。
在152例培养结果呈阳性的患者中,131例(86%)分离出金黄色葡萄球菌(SA),56例(37%)分离出铜绿假单胞菌(PA),34例(22%)分离出化脓性链球菌(GAS)。68%的患者培养出对甲氧西林敏感的SA,47%培养出耐甲氧西林的SA(18例患者在不同时间点培养出对甲氧西林敏感和耐甲氧西林的SA)。在15例有记录的对莫匹罗星敏感性检测呈SA阳性培养的患者中,11例为对莫匹罗星敏感的SA,6例为对莫匹罗星耐药的SA(2例患者培养出对莫匹罗星敏感和耐药的SA)。整个数据库中有23例患者报告患有鳞状细胞癌,其中10例伤口培养记录显示,分别有90%、50%和20%的病例SA、PA和变形杆菌属呈阳性。
SA和PA是伤口中最常分离出的细菌。分别有47%和40%接受检测的患者报告有耐甲氧西林和耐莫匹罗星情况,这凸显了持续采取抗菌策略以限制抗生素耐药性的重要性。