Suppr超能文献

酒精和烟草相关疾病的风险与保护因素:观察性研究的综合评价

Risk and protective factors for alcohol and tobacco related disorders: An umbrella review of observational studies.

作者信息

Solmi Marco, Civardi Serena, Corti Roberto, Anil John, Demurtas Jacopo, Lange Shannon, Radua Joaquim, Dragioti Elena, Fusar-Poli Paolo, Carvalho Andre F

机构信息

Neuroscience Department, University of Padua, Italy; Padua Neuroscience Center, University of Padua, Italy; Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Laboratory, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Feb;121:20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Nov 25.

Abstract

The credibility of evidence of various environmental risk factors for alcohol and tobacco use disorders (AUD/TUD) needs to be graded to identify groups to target with selective prevention. A systematic umbrella review was conducted (PubMed/PsycINFO), grading credibility of meta-analyses of prospective/retrospective observational cohort studies assessing risk/protective factors for AUD/TUD, applying established quantitative criteria. Sensitivity analyses were conducted. Quality of eligible meta-analyses was assessed with AMSTAR-2. Out of 8464 unique references, 80 full text articles were scrutinized, and 12 meta-analyses, corresponding to 21 individual estimates of 12 putative risk/protective factors (n = 241,300), were included. In main analyses no association had convincing nor highly suggestive evidence for AUD/TUD. Six associations had suggestive evidence for AUD, two for TUD. Among these, in sensitivity analyses without >1000 cases criterion, convincing evidence emerged for parental alcohol supply, and impulsivity traits in college students for AUD, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder for TUD. Other associations were supported by weak evidence/were not nominally significant. Few risk factors identified at-risk groups where selective preventative strategies could be developed to prevent AUD/TUD.

摘要

为了确定可针对其开展选择性预防的群体,需要对酒精和烟草使用障碍(AUD/TUD)各种环境风险因素的证据可信度进行分级。我们进行了一项系统的综合综述(通过PubMed/PsycINFO),应用既定的定量标准,对评估AUD/TUD风险/保护因素的前瞻性/回顾性观察队列研究的荟萃分析的可信度进行分级。我们进行了敏感性分析。使用AMSTAR-2评估合格荟萃分析的质量。在8464篇独特参考文献中,对80篇全文文章进行了审查,纳入了12项荟萃分析,对应于12个假定风险/保护因素的21项个体估计(n = 241,300)。在主要分析中,没有关联对AUD/TUD有令人信服或高度提示性的证据。六项关联对AUD有提示性证据,两项对TUD有提示性证据。其中,在没有>1000例标准的敏感性分析中,出现了关于父母酒精供应、大学生冲动特质与AUD以及注意缺陷多动障碍与TUD的令人信服的证据。其他关联得到的证据薄弱/名义上不显著。很少有风险因素能确定可制定选择性预防策略以预防AUD/TUD的高危群体。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验