Suppr超能文献

初次就诊时采用泡沫硬化疗法治疗静脉性溃疡的十年经验。

Ten years of experience with first-visit foam sclerotherapy to initiate venous ulcer healing.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland; Medical Research Center Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Medical Research Center Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Jul;9(4):954-960. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.11.012. Epub 2020 Nov 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the effect of first-visit foam sclerotherapy compared with scheduled treatment for patients with venous ulceration.

METHODS

The study design was a retrospective comparative study. From December 2009 to October 2019, a total of 245 venous ulcers in 214 patients (including recurrent ulcers) were treated at Oulu University Hospital. Of these 245 venous ulcers, 143 were treated with first-visit foam sclerotherapy (group A) and 102 with scheduled treatment (group B). All patients received endovenous ablation (foam sclerotherapy and/or endothermal ablation) and compression therapy to promote venous ulcer healing. The primary outcome was the interval to ulcer healing, determined by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The secondary outcomes included the time to ulcer healing from the receipt of referral and ulcer recurrence.

RESULTS

The median time to ulcer healing was 2.3 months for group A and 3.2 months for group B (P = .002). The estimated median ulcer healing times after referral for a first session of endovenous ablation were 2.7 months with a delay of <1 month from the referral, 3.3 months with a delay of 1 to 2 months, and 5.0 months with a delay of >2 months (P = .002). In group A, recurrent ulcers were recorded for 11 patients (7.7%). In group B, recurrent ulcers were recorded for 12 patients (11.8%; P = .281).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present retrospective comparative study support first-visit foam sclerotherapy as an effective method to initiate endovenous ablation to promote venous ulcer healing. In venous ulcers, delays to endovenous ablation should be avoided whenever possible.

摘要

目的

我们评估了初次就诊泡沫硬化疗法与预定治疗对静脉溃疡患者的疗效。

方法

研究设计为回顾性比较研究。2009 年 12 月至 2019 年 10 月,奥卢大学医院共治疗了 214 例(包括复发性溃疡)患者的 245 处静脉溃疡。在这 245 处静脉溃疡中,143 处采用初次就诊泡沫硬化疗法(A 组)治疗,102 处采用预定治疗(B 组)。所有患者均接受静脉内消融(泡沫硬化疗法和/或热消融)和加压治疗以促进静脉溃疡愈合。主要结局为通过 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析确定的溃疡愈合间隔。次要结局包括从转诊到溃疡愈合的时间和溃疡复发。

结果

A 组溃疡愈合的中位时间为 2.3 个月,B 组为 3.2 个月(P=0.002)。初次静脉内消融治疗转诊后估计的溃疡愈合中位时间为:转诊后 1 个月内就诊的患者为 2.7 个月,1-2 个月内就诊的患者为 3.3 个月,2 个月以上就诊的患者为 5.0 个月(P=0.002)。A 组有 11 例(7.7%)患者出现复发性溃疡。B 组有 12 例(11.8%)患者出现复发性溃疡(P=0.281)。

结论

本回顾性比较研究的结果支持初次就诊泡沫硬化疗法作为启动静脉内消融以促进静脉溃疡愈合的有效方法。在静脉溃疡中,应尽可能避免延迟静脉内消融。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验