生物类似物格利司他汀供应与生物格利司他汀产品的理赔支付和患者自付费用变化之间的关联。

Association Between Filgrastim Biosimilar Availability and Changes in Claim Payments and Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs for Biologic Filgrastim Products.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Value Health. 2020 Dec;23(12):1599-1605. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.06.014. Epub 2020 Oct 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the effect of filgrastim-sndz market entry on patient out-of-pocket costs and claim payments for filgrastim products.

METHODS

This study used a single interrupted time series design with longitudinal, nationally representative, individual-level claims data from IBM MarketScan. Analyses included all outpatient and prescription claims for branded filgrastim (filgrastim and tbo-filgrastim) and biosimilar filgrastim (filgrastim-sndz) from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2017. Outcomes of interest included changes in monthly claim payments and monthly patient out-of-pocket costs for filgrastim products.

RESULTS

In the baseline period (January 2014 to February 2016), insurers paid an average of $472.21 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 465.38-479.03) for 480 mcg of branded filgrastim, whereas patients paid an average of $49.26 (CI: 34.25-64.27). Filgrastim-sndz market entry was associated with a statistically significant and immediate 1-month decrease in insurer payment of $30.77 (95% CI: -40.59 to -20.94) and a significant decrease in monthly insurer payment trend of $3.10 per month (95% CI: -3.90 to -2.31) relative to baseline. Long-term changes in patient out-of-pocket costs were modest and restricted to beneficiaries enrolled in high cost sharing plans.

CONCLUSIONS

Biosimilar filgrastim availability led to significant immediate and long-term decreases in claims payments for filgrastim products, supporting efforts to facilitate biosimilar adoption in the United States. Nevertheless, there were only slight changes in patient out-of-pocket costs, restricted to beneficiaries enrolled in high cost sharing plans, suggesting the importance of further work assessing the relationship between biosimilar availability and patient out-of-pocket costs.

摘要

目的

评估非格司亭-sndz 上市对患者自付费用和非格司亭产品报销支付的影响。

方法

本研究使用了具有纵向、全国代表性的个体水平索赔数据的 IBM MarketScan 单中断时间序列设计。分析包括从 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日的品牌非格司亭(非格司亭和 tbo-非格司亭)和生物类似药非格司亭(非格司亭-sndz)的所有门诊和处方索赔。感兴趣的结果包括非格司亭产品的每月索赔支付和每月患者自付费用的变化。

结果

在基线期(2014 年 1 月至 2016 年 2 月),保险公司平均支付 472.21 美元(95%置信区间[CI]:465.38-479.03)用于 480 mcg 的品牌非格司亭,而患者平均支付 49.26 美元(CI:34.25-64.27)。非格司亭-sndz 上市与保险公司支付的统计显著和立即减少 1 个月内减少了 30.77 美元(95% CI:-40.59 至 -20.94),并且每月保险公司支付趋势显著减少 3.10 美元/月(95% CI:-3.90 至 -2.31)与基线相比。患者自付费用的长期变化幅度较小,仅限于参加高共付计划的受益人群。

结论

生物类似药非格司亭的可获得性导致非格司亭产品的索赔支付显著立即和长期减少,支持在美国促进生物类似药采用的努力。然而,患者自付费用只有轻微变化,仅限于参加高共付计划的受益人群,这表明需要进一步评估生物类似药的可获得性与患者自付费用之间的关系。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索