Suppr超能文献

2014 年至 2019 年期间,具有商业或医疗保险的癌症成人患者在生物类似药上市后使用粒细胞集落刺激因子的趋势。

Trends in Use of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Following Introduction of Biosimilars Among Adults With Cancer and Commercial or Medicare Insurance From 2014 to 2019.

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville.

Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2133474. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33474.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The introduction of biosimilars and novel delivery devices between 2014 and 2019 may have changed the utilization of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF).

OBJECTIVE

To assess utilization trends of G-CSFs for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia (FN) among patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy with commercial or Medicare insurance.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study assessed G-CSF utilization trends overall and stratified by regimen febrile neutropenia risk level. Associations between patient characteristics and G-CSF use were evaluated. Patients with cancer, including breast, lung, colorectal, esophageal and gastric, pancreatic, prostate, ovarian, and non-Hodgkin lymphomas, initiating myelosuppressive chemotherapy courses were included from the 2014 to 2019 commercial insurance and 2014 to 2018 Medicare fee-for-service claims databases. Data were analyzed from March to June 2021.

EXPOSURES

Year of chemotherapy initiation.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcomes were use and trends of G-CSFs for primary prophylaxis, from completion to 3 days after in the first chemotherapy cycle.

RESULTS

In total, 86 731 chemotherapy courses (mean [SD] age, 57.7 [11.5] years; 57 838 [66.7%] women and 28 893 [33.3%] men) were identified from 82 410 patients in the commercial insurance database and 32 398 chemotherapy courses (mean [SD] age, 71.8 [8.3] years; 18 468 [57.0%] women and 13 930 [43.0%] men) were identified from 30 279 patients in the Medicare database. Among the commercially insured population, 39 639 patients (45.7%) received G-CSFs, and 12 562 patients (38.8%) received G-CSFs among Medicare insured patients. Overall G-CSF use increased significantly throughout the study period in both populations, from 45.1% (95% CI, 44.4%-45.7%) of patients in 2014 to 47.5% (95% CI, 46.5%-48.5%) of patients in 2019 (P = .001) in the commercially insured population and from 36.0% (95% CI, 34.2%-38.0%) of patients in 2014 to 39.1% (95% CI, 38.1%-40.1%) of patients in 2018 (P < .001) in the Medicare population. The greatest increases in G-CSF use were observed among patients with high FN risk, from 75.0% (95% CI, 74.1%-76.0%) of patients to 83.2% (95% CI, 82.0%-84.2%) of patients (P < .001) among the commercially insured population and 75.3% (95% CI, 71.8%-78.6%) of patients to 86.2% (95% CI, 84.7%-87.6%) of patients (P < .001) among the Medicare population. Use of G-CSFs decreased in the commercially insured population among patients with intermediate FN risk (from 27.5% [95% CI, 26.4%-28.5%] of patients to 20.4% [95% CI, 19.1%-21.7%] of patients; P < .001) or low FN risk (from 19.3% [95% CI, 18.3%-20.4%] of patients to 16.3% [95% CI, 14.7%-18.0%] of patients; P < .001) and remained stable in the Medicare population (intermediate risk: from 26.4% [95% CI, 23.8%-29.2%] of patients to 28.4% [95% CI, 27.0%-29.8%] of patients; P = .35; low risk: from 19.6% [95% CI, 17.0%-22.4%] of patients to 20.9% [95% CI, 19.6%-22.3%] of patients; P = .58). Factors associated with increased odds of G-CSF use included older age (commercial insurance: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.50 [95% CI, 1.41-1.59]; Medicare: aOR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.08-1.71]), receiving a regimen with high FN risk (commercial insurance: aOR, 16.01 [95% CI, 15.17-16.90]; Medicare: aOR, 17.17 [95% CI, 15.76-18.71]), and history of neutropenia (commercial insurance: 3.90 (3.67-4.15); Medicare: 3.82 (3.50-4.18).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cross-sectional study found that utilization of G-CSFs increased among patients with cancer with high FN risk in both a commercially and Medicare-insured population, but 14% to 17% of patients still did not receive preventive treatment.

摘要

重要性:在 2014 年至 2019 年间,生物仿制药和新型给药装置的引入可能改变了粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的利用情况。

目的:评估在有商业保险或医疗保险的癌症患者中,接受骨髓抑制化疗的患者中 G-CSF 用于预防发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的使用趋势。

设计、地点和参与者:本横断面研究评估了整体 G-CSF 利用趋势,并按方案发热性中性粒细胞减少症风险水平进行了分层。评估了患者特征与 G-CSF 使用之间的关联。纳入了接受骨髓抑制化疗的癌症患者,包括乳腺癌、肺癌、结直肠癌、食管癌和胃癌、胰腺癌、前列腺癌、卵巢癌和非霍奇金淋巴瘤,来自 2014 年至 2019 年商业保险和 2014 年至 2018 年医疗保险费用报销数据库。数据于 2021 年 3 月至 6 月进行分析。

暴露:化疗开始的年份。

主要结果和措施:主要结果是在第一个化疗周期完成后 3 天内,预防使用 G-CSF 的情况和趋势。

结果:在商业保险数据库中,从 82410 名患者中确定了 86731 个化疗疗程(平均[标准差]年龄为 57.7[11.5]岁;57838[66.7%]名女性和 28893[33.3%]名男性),从 30279 名患者中确定了 32398 个化疗疗程(平均[标准差]年龄为 71.8[8.3]岁;18468[57.0%]名女性和 13930[43.0%]名男性)在医疗保险数据库中。在商业保险人群中,有 39639 名患者(45.7%)接受了 G-CSF,12562 名患者(38.8%)接受了 G-CSF。在两个人群中,总体 G-CSF 使用率在整个研究期间均显著增加,从 2014 年的 45.1%(95%置信区间,44.4%-45.7%)到 2019 年的 47.5%(95%置信区间,46.5%-48.5%)(P<.001)在商业保险人群中,从 2014 年的 36.0%(95%置信区间,34.2%-38.0%)到 2018 年的 39.1%(95%置信区间,38.1%-40.1%)(P<.001)在医疗保险人群中。高 FN 风险患者中 G-CSF 使用率的增加最为显著,从 75.0%(95%置信区间,74.1%-76.0%)的患者增加到 83.2%(95%置信区间,82.0%-84.2%)的患者(P<.001)在商业保险人群中,从 75.3%(95%置信区间,71.8%-78.6%)的患者增加到 86.2%(95%置信区间,84.7%-87.6%)的患者(P<.001)在医疗保险人群中。商业保险人群中,中度 FN 风险(从 27.5%(95%置信区间,26.4%-28.5%)的患者降至 20.4%(95%置信区间,19.1%-21.7%)的患者;P<.001)或低 FN 风险(从 19.3%(95%置信区间,18.3%-20.4%)的患者降至 16.3%(95%置信区间,14.7%-18.0%)的患者;P<.001)的 G-CSF 使用率下降,而医疗保险人群的使用率保持稳定(中度风险:从 26.4%(95%置信区间,23.8%-29.2%)的患者降至 28.4%(95%置信区间,27.0%-29.8%)的患者;P=.35;低风险:从 19.6%(95%置信区间,17.0%-22.4%)的患者降至 20.9%(95%置信区间,19.6%-22.3%)的患者;P=.58)。与 G-CSF 使用增加相关的因素包括年龄较大(商业保险:调整后优势比[OR],1.50[95%置信区间,1.41-1.59];医疗保险:OR,1.36[95%置信区间,1.08-1.71])、接受高 FN 风险方案(商业保险:OR,16.01[95%置信区间,15.17-16.90];医疗保险:OR,17.17[95%置信区间,15.76-18.71])和中性粒细胞减少症史(商业保险:3.90[3.67-4.15];医疗保险:3.82[3.50-4.18])。

结论:本横断面研究发现,在有商业保险和医疗保险的癌症患者中,高 FN 风险患者的 G-CSF 使用率均有所增加,但仍有 14%至 17%的患者未接受预防治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2801/8611485/0d0b927eccf7/jamanetwopen-e2133474-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验