Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Urology Unit, Academic Medical Centre, Santa Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Oct;5(5):587-600. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
This report presents a 56-yr-old man in good general health status, newly diagnosed with a cT3b, cN1, cM1b, International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 3, low-volume (CHAARTED criteria), low-risk (LATITUDE criteria) metastatic prostate cancer. Staging was performed with conventional imaging: a computed tomography (CT) scan showed the presence of two enlarged lymph nodes on the left, close to the external iliac vessels. In addition, a suspicious 15-mm metastatic lesion was detected in the left pubic bone. This lesion was confirmed on the bone scan, without further metastatic lesions. In the context of a clinical trial, after an initial course of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the patient was treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (histopathological examination: ypT3b pN1 R1). Postprostatectomy radiation therapy was delivered on prostatic bed (70Gy), pelvic lymph node area (54Gy), and pubic bone (51Gy). ADT was scheduled for a total period of 36 mo. Currently, the patient is still receiving ADT, which will be completed within 6 mo. The last prostate-specific antigen level was undetectable. The discussion is focused on the following three open questions: (1) Would molecular imaging (eg, prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/CT) change the therapeutic approach to the patient? (2) Is there a role for local treatment in the metastatic setting? (iii) Should metastasis-directed therapy be considered for this patient? PATIENT SUMMARY: The optimal management of patients newly diagnosed with oligometastatic prostate cancer remains challenging. The fields of staging with modern imaging and therapy with novel treatment options are evolving rapidly. In particular, the role of a prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan for primary staging, the impact of a local treatment on the prostate, and the effect of direct therapies on the metastases represent important open questions in this intriguing field.
这篇报告介绍了一位 56 岁、一般健康状况良好的男性,新诊断为 cT3b、cN1、cM1b、国际泌尿病理学会分级组 3、低容量(CHAARTED 标准)、低风险(LATITUDE 标准)转移性前列腺癌。分期采用常规影像学方法进行:计算机断层扫描(CT)显示左侧靠近髂外血管的两个淋巴结肿大。此外,左侧耻骨还发现了一个可疑的 15 毫米转移性病变。该病变在骨扫描中得到证实,无其他转移性病变。在临床试验中,在初始雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)后,患者接受了机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术和扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术(组织病理学检查:ypT3b pN1 R1)。前列腺床(70Gy)、盆腔淋巴结区域(54Gy)和耻骨(51Gy)进行前列腺切除术后放疗。ADT 计划总疗程为 36 个月。目前,患者仍在接受 ADT,将在 6 个月内完成。最后一次前列腺特异性抗原水平无法检测到。讨论集中在以下三个开放性问题上:(1)分子成像(如前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描/CT)是否会改变患者的治疗方法?(2)在转移性环境中局部治疗是否有作用?(iii)是否应考虑为该患者进行转移性定向治疗?患者总结:新诊断为寡转移前列腺癌患者的最佳治疗管理仍然具有挑战性。现代影像学分期和新型治疗方案的治疗领域正在迅速发展。特别是前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描/CT 扫描在原发分期中的作用、局部治疗对前列腺的影响以及直接治疗对转移灶的影响,是这一引人入胜领域的重要开放性问题。