Togoli Irene, Marlair Cathy, Collignon Olivier, Arrighi Roberto, Crollen Virginie
International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste, Italy.
Psychological Sciences Research Institute (IPSY) and Institute of NeuroScience (IoNS), Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Cortex. 2021 Jan;134:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
Humans, and several non-human species, possess the ability to make approximate but reliable estimates of the number of objects around them. Alike other perceptual features, numerosity perception is susceptible to adaptation: exposure to a high number of items causes underestimation of the numerosity of a subsequent set of items, and vice versa. Several studies have investigated adaptation in the auditory and visual modality, whereby stimuli are preferentially encoded in an external coordinate system. As tactile stimuli are primarily coded in an internal (body-centered) reference frame, here we ask whether tactile numerosity adaptation operates based on internal or external spatial coordinates as it occurs in vision or audition. Twenty participants performed an adaptation task with their right hand located either in the right (uncrossed) or left (crossed) hemispace, in order for the two hands to occupy either two completely different positions, or the same position in space, respectively. Tactile adaptor and test stimuli were passively delivered either to the same (adapted) or different (non-adapted) hands. Our results show a clear signature of tactile numerosity adaptation aftereffects with a pattern of over- and under-estimation according to the adaptation rate (low and high, respectively). In the uncrossed position, we observed stronger adaptation effects when adaptor and test stimuli were delivered to the "adapted" hand. However, when both hands were aligned in the same spatial position (crossed condition), the magnitude of adaptation was similar irrespective of which hand received adaptor and test stimuli. These results demonstrate that numerosity information is automatically coded in external coordinates even in the tactile modality, suggesting that such a spatial reference frame is an intrinsic property of numerosity processing irrespective of the sensory modality.
人类以及一些非人类物种具备对周围物体数量进行大致但可靠估计的能力。与其他感知特征一样,数字感知容易受到适应的影响:接触大量物品会导致对后续一组物品数量的低估,反之亦然。多项研究调查了听觉和视觉模态中的适应情况,在这些模态中,刺激优先在外部坐标系中进行编码。由于触觉刺激主要在内部(以身体为中心)参考系中编码,在此我们要问,触觉数字适应是否像在视觉或听觉中那样基于内部或外部空间坐标起作用。20名参与者用右手执行一项适应任务,右手分别位于右(未交叉)或左(交叉)半空间,以使两只手分别占据两个完全不同的位置或空间中的相同位置。触觉适应刺激和测试刺激被被动地施加到同一只(适应的)或不同的(未适应的)手上。我们的结果显示出触觉数字适应后效的明显特征,根据适应率(分别为低和高)呈现高估和低估的模式。在未交叉位置,当适应刺激和测试刺激施加到“适应的”手上时,我们观察到更强的适应效果。然而,当两只手在同一空间位置对齐(交叉条件)时,无论哪只手接受适应刺激和测试刺激,适应的程度都相似。这些结果表明,即使在触觉模态中,数字信息也是在外部坐标中自动编码的,这表明这样的空间参考系是数字处理的固有属性,与感觉模态无关。