• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在共享决策中实现价值循环:通过患者报告的结果和体验测量为共享决策过程提供信息的数字框架。

Closing the value-based circle in shared decision-making: a digital framework for informing the shared decision-making process through patient reported outcome and experience measures.

机构信息

Hospital Management, Quirónsalud 4H Network, Madrid, Spain.

Clinical and Organizational Innovation Unit (UICO), Quirónsalud 4H Network, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 29;12:1452440. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1452440. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1452440
PMID:39267640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11390557/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The spreading adoption of value-based models of healthcare delivery has incentivized the use of patient-reported outcomes and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs) in clinical practice, with the potential to enrich the decision-making process with patient-reported data.

METHODS

This perspective article explores PROs and the shared decision-making (SDM) process as components of value-based healthcare. We describe the potential of PROMs and PREMs within the decision-making process and present a digital framework for informing the shared decision-making process using aggregated data from a healthcare system PROMs and PREMs program, including early results from implementation in hospital network in Madrid, Spain.

RESULTS

The proposed digital framework incorporates aggregated data from a hospital network PROMs and PREMs program as part of a digital patient decision aid (PDA) for patients with lymphoma. After the first hematologist appointment, participating patients access the PDA to review relevant information about clinical and patient-reported outcomes for each of the possible options, assign a personal order of priority to different outcomes, and then select their preferred course of action. Patients' answers are automatically uploaded to the EHR and discussed with hematologists at the next appointment. After beginning treatment, patients are invited to participate in the network PROMs program; participants' PROMs data are fed back into the PDA, thus "closing the circle" between the decision-making process and patient-reported data collection.During the first 14 months after launching the decision aid in October 2022, of 25 patients diagnosed with follicular lymphoma at the four participating hospitals, 13 patients decided to participate. No significant differences in age or sex were observed between groups. Average SDM Q-9 score for patients filling in the questionnaire ( = 6) was 36.15 of 45 points.

CONCLUSION

Various obstacles toward widespread implementation of SDM exist such as time constraints, lack of motivation, and resistance to change. Support and active engagement from policy makers and healthcare managers is key to overcome hurdles for capturing patient-reported data and carrying out shared decision-making at healthcare system level. Early results of a digital framework for PRO-enriched SDM seem to be beneficial to the decision-making process.

摘要

背景

基于价值的医疗服务模式的广泛采用,激励了在临床实践中使用患者报告的结局和体验测量(PROMs 和 PREMs),有可能通过患者报告的数据丰富决策过程。

方法

本文探讨了 PROs 和共同决策(SDM)过程作为基于价值的医疗保健的组成部分。我们描述了 PROMs 和 PREMs 在决策过程中的潜力,并提出了一个使用医疗系统 PROMs 和 PREMs 计划汇总数据为共同决策过程提供信息的数字框架,包括在西班牙马德里的医院网络实施的早期结果。

结果

所提出的数字框架纳入了来自医院网络 PROMs 和 PREMs 计划的汇总数据,作为淋巴瘤患者数字患者决策辅助工具(PDA)的一部分。在第一次血液科就诊后,参与的患者可以访问 PDA,查看每个可能选项的临床和患者报告结局的相关信息,对不同结局进行个人优先级排序,然后选择他们首选的行动方案。患者的答案会自动上传到电子病历,并在下次就诊时与血液科医生讨论。开始治疗后,患者会被邀请参与网络 PROMs 计划;参与者的 PROMs 数据会反馈到 PDA 中,从而在决策过程和患者报告数据收集之间“闭环”。自 2022 年 10 月推出决策辅助工具以来的头 14 个月中,在四家参与医院诊断为滤泡性淋巴瘤的 25 名患者中,有 13 名患者决定参与。参与组和不参与组在年龄和性别方面没有显著差异。填写问卷的患者的平均 SDM Q-9 评分( = 6)为 45 分中的 36.15 分。

结论

广泛实施 SDM 存在各种障碍,如时间限制、缺乏动力和抵制变革。政策制定者和医疗保健管理人员的支持和积极参与是克服障碍的关键,以便在医疗系统层面捕获患者报告的数据并进行共同决策。PRO 丰富的 SDM 数字框架的早期结果似乎对决策过程有益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7859/11390557/82c8aeaebc26/fpubh-12-1452440-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7859/11390557/bc7b39bb96bc/fpubh-12-1452440-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7859/11390557/82c8aeaebc26/fpubh-12-1452440-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7859/11390557/bc7b39bb96bc/fpubh-12-1452440-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7859/11390557/82c8aeaebc26/fpubh-12-1452440-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Closing the value-based circle in shared decision-making: a digital framework for informing the shared decision-making process through patient reported outcome and experience measures.在共享决策中实现价值循环:通过患者报告的结果和体验测量为共享决策过程提供信息的数字框架。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 29;12:1452440. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1452440. eCollection 2024.
2
The use of PROMs and shared decision-making in medical encounters with patients: An opportunity to deliver value-based health care to patients.在与患者的医疗接触中使用患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)和共同决策:为患者提供基于价值的医疗服务的契机。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;26(2):524-540. doi: 10.1111/jep.13321. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
3
Design, implementation and usability analysis of patient empowerment in ADLIFE project via patient reported outcome measures and shared decision making.通过患者报告结局测量和共享决策,在 ADLIFE 项目中设计、实施和分析患者赋权及其可用性。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Jun 28;24(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02588-y.
4
Evaluating the Population-Based Usage and Benefit of Digitally Collected Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences in Patients With Chronic Diseases: The PROMchronic Study Protocol.评估慢性病患者中基于人群的数字化患者报告结局和体验的使用情况和获益:PROMchronic 研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 5;13:e56487. doi: 10.2196/56487.
5
Healthcare provider characteristics that influence the implementation of individual-level patient-centered outcome measure (PROM) and patient-reported experience measure (PREM) data across practice settings: a protocol for a mixed methods systematic review with a narrative synthesis.影响个体层面患者为中心的结局测量(PROM)和患者报告的体验测量(PREM)数据在各实践环境中实施的医疗服务提供者特征:一项混合方法系统评价的方案,采用叙述性综合方法。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 9;10(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01725-2.
6
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
7
Barriers and enablers to the implementation of patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs/PREMs): protocol for an umbrella review.实施患者报告的结局和体验测量(PROMs/PREMs)的障碍和促进因素:伞式综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 26;13(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02512-5.
8
Is Shared Decision-making Associated with Better Patient-reported Outcomes? A Longitudinal Study of Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty.共享决策是否与更好的患者报告结局相关?一项全膝关节置换术后患者的纵向研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jan 1;480(1):82-91. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001920.
9
Continuing professional education of Iranian healthcare professionals in shared decision-making: lessons learned.伊朗医疗保健专业人员在共同决策方面的继续职业教育:经验教训
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 12;21(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06233-6.
10
Patients' and physicians' gender and perspective on shared decision-making: A cross-sectional study from Dubai.患者和医生的性别以及对共同决策的看法:来自迪拜的一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 1;17(9):e0270700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270700. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of communication, trust, and respect on shared decision-making: insights from healthcare providers in Chinese public hospitals.沟通、信任和尊重对共同决策的影响:来自中国公立医院医护人员的见解
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 18;12:1577276. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1577276. eCollection 2025.
2
Value-Based Healthcare in Cardiology: How to Integrate a more Comprehensive View into Medical Decision-Making?心脏病学中的价值医疗:如何将更全面的观点纳入医疗决策?
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025 Apr 4;122(2):e20240668. doi: 10.36660/abc.20240668. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of a patient reported experience measure for experimental cancer medicines (PREM-ECM) and their carers (PREM-ECM-Carer).开发并验证了一种用于实验性癌症药物(PREM-ECM)及其护理人员的患者报告体验测量工具(PREM-ECM-Carer)。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11963-x.
2
Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Monitoring to Improve Quality of Life After Joint Replacement: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.电子患者报告结局监测对改善关节置换术后生活质量的作用:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2331301. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31301.
3
Correlation of Clinician- and Patient-Reported Outcomes in the BC2001 Trial.
BC2001试验中临床医生报告结果与患者报告结果的相关性
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2023 May;35(5):331-338. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
4
Improving Outcome-Driven Care in Multiple Myeloma Using Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Qualitative Evaluation Study.采用患者报告结局改善多发性骨髓瘤的疗效导向型护理:一项定性评估研究。
Patient. 2023 May;16(3):255-264. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00616-z. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
5
A Systematic Review of Decision Aids in Hematologic Malignancies: What Are Currently Available and What Are We Missing?血液系统恶性肿瘤决策辅助工具的系统评价:目前有哪些可用的,我们还缺少哪些?
Oncologist. 2023 Feb 8;28(2):105-115. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac231.
6
Shared Decision-Making and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Valvular Heart Disease.心脏瓣膜病中的共同决策与患者报告结局指标
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 8;9:863040. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.863040. eCollection 2022.
7
The role of patient-reported outcome measures in the continuum of cancer clinical care: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline.患者报告结局指标在癌症临床连续照护中的作用:ESMO临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2022 Sep;33(9):878-892. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.007. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
8
The role of age and digital competence on the use of online health and social care services: A cross-sectional population-based survey.年龄和数字能力对在线健康与社会护理服务使用的影响:一项基于人群的横断面调查。
Digit Health. 2022 Jan 28;8:20552076221074485. doi: 10.1177/20552076221074485. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
9
Digital decision aid for prenatal counseling in imminent extreme premature labor: development and pilot testing.用于紧急极早产产前咨询的数字决策辅助工具:开发和初步测试。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jan 6;22(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01735-z.
10
Facilitators and barriers for implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care: An academic center's initial experience.在临床护理中实施患者报告结局测量的促进因素和障碍:学术中心的初步经验。
Health Policy. 2021 Sep;125(9):1247-1255. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.07.001. Epub 2021 Jul 8.